You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ratis.apache.org by "Glen Geng (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/07/14 07:52:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (RATIS-1001) CLONE - shouldWithholdVotes() should be triggered for handling higher term

Glen Geng created RATIS-1001:
--------------------------------

             Summary: CLONE - shouldWithholdVotes() should be triggered for handling higher term
                 Key: RATIS-1001
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-1001
             Project: Ratis
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: server
    Affects Versions: 0.5.0
            Reporter: Glen Geng
            Assignee: Glen Geng


 

I assume that {{shouldWithholdVotes()}} is used to handle request vote request with higher candidate term from disruptive server, but currently it just ignored such requests, since it only take effect when {{(state.getCurrentTerm() >= candidateTerm)}} .

shouldWithholdVotes() should be triggered for handling higher term. If currentTerm is larger or equal to candidateTerm, just reject the request vote, no need further handling.

 

Current code is 
{code:java}
private boolean shouldWithholdVotes(long candidateTerm) {
  if (state.getCurrentTerm() < candidateTerm) {
    return false; 
  } else if (isLeader()) {
    return true; 
  } else {
    // following a leader and not yet timeout
    return isFollower() && state.hasLeader()
        && role.getFollowerState().map(FollowerState::shouldWithholdVotes).orElse(false);
  }
}
{code}
Modify to 
{code:java}
private boolean shouldWithholdVotes(long candidateTerm) {
  if (state.getCurrentTerm() >= candidateTerm) {
    return false; 
  } else if (isLeader()) {
    return true; 
  } else {
    // following a leader and not yet timeout
    return isFollower() && state.hasLeader()
        && role.getFollowerState().map(FollowerState::shouldWithholdVotes).orElse(false);
  }
}
{code}
 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)