You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@nutch.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/22 21:59:24 UTC
Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Good Evening Everyone,
A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/
The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
archive of the sources in:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/
Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
javadoc.jar is available here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
Kind Regards,
Lewis
P.S. Here's my +1.
--
Lewis
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Sebastian Nagel <wa...@googlemail.com>.
> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> volunteering?
ok
On 05/24/2012 09:27 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
> Hi Seb
>
> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
>
> [...]
>
>> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
>> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
>> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
>> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
>
> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
>
>
> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin version
> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile the
> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
>
> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
>> the tutorial.
>>
>
> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> volunteering?
>
> Julien
>
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
I'll have a pop later today Julien.
The ant tar-bin tar-src zip-bin and zip-src targets need to be
investigated. A resolution needs to be committed to branch-1.5 and
trunk before I can re-run the RC.
nutchgora will reflect these changes but will come later.
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Julien Nioche
<li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Lewis, Chris : where are we on this? Any chance we could have a RC3 soonish
> :-) ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Jul
>
> On 24 May 2012 22:02, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
> chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> Post this weekend if we don't have RC3, I will be glad to spin it.
>>
>> Release management is a tough job. Thanks to Lewis for RC2 and
>> happy to have his help and work with him to make RC3 (and others!) :)
>>
>> Just want to get a good 1.5 out the door and a good 2.0 out the door
>> and take care of business.
>>
>> By the way let's collectively pat ourselves on the back. The Apache Nutch
>> community is super strong, collaborative and fun right now and you guys
>> all rock!!
>>
>> -C
>>
>> On May 24, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Piet,
>> >
>> > Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would
>> > be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment
>> > directly on the docs. No contributions are too small
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> >
>> > Julien
>> >
>> > On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <pi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
>> >> attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite
>> steep
>> >> in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
>> >> distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I
>> don't
>> >> feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
>> >>
>> >> regards
>> >>
>> >> Piet
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
>> >> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi Seb
>> >>>
>> >>> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
>> >>>
>> >>> [...]
>> >>>
>> >>>> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
>> >>>> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
>> >>>> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
>> >>>> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
>> >>>
>> >>> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin
>> >> version
>> >>> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile
>> >> the
>> >>> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
>> >>>
>> >>> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
>> >>>> the tutorial.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
>> >>> volunteering?
>> >>>
>> >>> Julien
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> *
>> >>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>> >>>
>> >>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>> >>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>> >>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *
>> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>> >
>> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
>> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>>
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
--
Lewis
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi guys,
Lewis, Chris : where are we on this? Any chance we could have a RC3 soonish
:-) ?
Thanks
Jul
On 24 May 2012 22:02, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Post this weekend if we don't have RC3, I will be glad to spin it.
>
> Release management is a tough job. Thanks to Lewis for RC2 and
> happy to have his help and work with him to make RC3 (and others!) :)
>
> Just want to get a good 1.5 out the door and a good 2.0 out the door
> and take care of business.
>
> By the way let's collectively pat ourselves on the back. The Apache Nutch
> community is super strong, collaborative and fun right now and you guys
> all rock!!
>
> -C
>
> On May 24, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
>
> > Hi Piet,
> >
> > Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would
> > be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment
> > directly on the docs. No contributions are too small
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <pi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
> >> attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite
> steep
> >> in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
> >> distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I
> don't
> >> feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
> >>
> >> regards
> >>
> >> Piet
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
> >> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Seb
> >>>
> >>> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
> >>>
> >>> [...]
> >>>
> >>>> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> >>>> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> >>>> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> >>>> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
> >>>
> >>> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin
> >> version
> >>> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile
> >> the
> >>> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
> >>>
> >>> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> >>>> the tutorial.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> >>> volunteering?
> >>>
> >>> Julien
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> *
> >>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >>>
> >>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> >>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> >>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Guys,
Post this weekend if we don't have RC3, I will be glad to spin it.
Release management is a tough job. Thanks to Lewis for RC2 and
happy to have his help and work with him to make RC3 (and others!) :)
Just want to get a good 1.5 out the door and a good 2.0 out the door
and take care of business.
By the way let's collectively pat ourselves on the back. The Apache Nutch
community is super strong, collaborative and fun right now and you guys
all rock!!
-C
On May 24, 2012, at 9:01 AM, Julien Nioche wrote:
> Hi Piet,
>
> Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would
> be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment
> directly on the docs. No contributions are too small
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
> On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
>> attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite steep
>> in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
>> distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I don't
>> feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Piet
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
>> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Seb
>>>
>>> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
>>>> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
>>>> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
>>>> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
>>>
>>> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
>>>
>>>
>>> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin
>> version
>>> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile
>> the
>>> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
>>>
>>> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
>>>> the tutorial.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
>>> volunteering?
>>>
>>> Julien
>>>
>>> --
>>> *
>>> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>>>
>>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>>> http://www.digitalpebble.com
>>> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Piet,
Flagging the info in the Wiki which is either incorrect or outdated would
be useful in itself. Feel free to create a page to track this or comment
directly on the docs. No contributions are too small
Thanks
Julien
On 24 May 2012 08:37, Piet van Remortel <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
> attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite steep
> in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
> distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I don't
> feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
>
> regards
>
> Piet
>
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
> lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Seb
> >
> > Moved to dev@ as more relevant
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> > > What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> > > Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> > > place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
> >
> > "ant package-bin" suggests this.
> >
> >
> > yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin
> version
> > it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile
> the
> > job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
> >
> > It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> > > the tutorial.
> > >
> >
> > The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> > volunteering?
> >
> > Julien
> >
> > --
> > *
> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
> >
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Piet van Remortel <pi...@gmail.com>.
Can I carefully suggest that things like the tutorial indeed get some
attention in case of a new release. I found the learning curve quite steep
in the beginning exactly because of outdated nature of the plethora of
distributed information around. Wouldn't mind helping a hand, but I don't
feel I know nutch enough to write docs.
regards
Piet
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Julien Nioche <
lists.digitalpebble@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Seb
>
> Moved to dev@ as more relevant
>
> [...]
>
> > - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> > What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> > Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> > place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
>
> "ant package-bin" suggests this.
>
>
> yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin version
> it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile the
> job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
>
> It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> > the tutorial.
> >
>
> The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
> volunteering?
>
> Julien
>
> --
> *
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Seb
Moved to dev@ as more relevant
[...]
> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
"ant package-bin" suggests this.
yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin version
it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile the
job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> the tutorial.
>
The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
volunteering?
Julien
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Hi Seb
Moved to dev@ as more relevant
[...]
> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
> What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
> Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
> place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
"ant package-bin" suggests this.
yes. This has been discussed previously. If we are to produce a bin version
it makes more sense to expose the local runtime. You need to recompile the
job to use Nutch in distributed environment anyway
It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
> the tutorial.
>
The tutorial will need to be updated to reflect this change. You are
volunteering?
Julien
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Sebastian Nagel <wa...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
-1
package name
- starting with 1.1 the packages are named apache-nutch-1.x-*
Shouldn't we follow this convention?
- the top level folder inside is named differently in previous releases,
either
nutch-1.x (1.3-bin, 1.2-bin)
or
apache-nutch-1.x (1.4-bin, 1.4-src, 1.3-src, 1.2-src)
Shouldn't we agree upon one variant? Possibly one for bin,
the other for src?
> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
"ant package-bin" suggests this.
It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
the tutorial.
Sebastian
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Sebastian Nagel <wa...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
-1
package name
- starting with 1.1 the packages are named apache-nutch-1.x-*
Shouldn't we follow this convention?
- the top level folder inside is named differently in previous releases,
either
nutch-1.x (1.3-bin, 1.2-bin)
or
apache-nutch-1.x (1.4-bin, 1.4-src, 1.3-src, 1.2-src)
Shouldn't we agree upon one variant? Possibly one for bin,
the other for src?
> - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
What about runtime/deploy/, esp. nutch-1.5.job ?
Does it mean to abandon runtime/{local,deploy}/ and
place the content of runtime/local in the top level folder?
"ant package-bin" suggests this.
It would break the convention since 1.3. and contradict
the tutorial.
Sebastian
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
On 23 May 2012 16:20, Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> just checked the signature of nutch-1.5-bin.tar.gz and it is fine, so are
> the md5 and sha
>
> *gpg --verify nutch-1.5-bin.tar.gz.asc nutch-1.5-bin.tar.gz
> gpg: Signature made Tue 22 May 2012 20:35:25 BST using RSA key ID C601BCA7
> gpg: Good signature from "Lewis John McGibbney (CODE SIGNING KEY) <
> lewismc@apache.org>"
> gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
> owner.
> Primary key fingerprint: 2A23 D53F 8D27 5CB6 91E1 89C1 F45E 7970 C601 BCA7
> *
>
> see http://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#basic-facts
>
> Thanks
>
> Julien
>
>
> On 23 May 2012 12:24, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> This my my problem.
>>
>> There is some work to be done with the dist targets... I'll hopefully
>> get around to it tonight or tomorrow as I've now heard back from the
>> guys at Ant and have hopefully cracked the problem I was having
>> pushing the 2.0RC... just as well I didn't now!
>>
>> Thanks for the review Julien.
>>
>> I wonder if you could even check the file signatures so I know if these
>> went OK.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Lewis
>>
>> Lewis
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Julien Nioche
>> <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Guys,
>> >
>> > -1 for the following reasons :
>> >
>> > - bin and src should not have the same content
>> > - bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
>> > - src should not contain runtime/ -> this will be built by Ant
>> >
>> > The first point is critical, the second is not.
>> >
>> > Julien
>> >
>> >
>> > On 22 May 2012 23:31, Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Great!
>> >>
>> >> My +1 for a new release based on the state of the codebase.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -----Original message-----
>> >> > From:Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>
>> >> > Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 22:19
>> >> > To: dev@nutch.apache.org
>> >> > Cc: user@nutch.apache.org
>> >> > Subject: Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
>> >> >
>> >> > Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ <
>> >> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/> :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com<mailto:
>> >> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> > wrote:
>> >> > Good Evening Everyone,
>> >> >
>> >> > A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/ <
>> >> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/>
>> >> >
>> >> > The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and
>> bin.tar.gz
>> >> > archive of the sources in:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/ <
>> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/>
>> >> >
>> >> > Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
>> >> > javadoc.jar is available here:
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
>> >> >
>> >> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
>> >> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
>> >> > least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>> >> >
>> >> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
>> >> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>> >> >
>> >> > Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>> >> >
>> >> > Kind Regards,
>> >> > Lewis
>> >> >
>> >> > P.S. Here's my +1.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Lewis
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif>
>> >> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>> >> >
>> >> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <
>> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/>
>> >> > http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com>
>> >> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > *
>> > *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>> >
>> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
>> > http://www.digitalpebble.com
>> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lewis
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *
> *
> Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
>
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Guys,
-1 for the following reasons :
- bin and src should not have the same content
- bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
- src should not contain runtime/ -> this will be built by Ant
The first point is critical, the second is not.
Julien
On 22 May 2012 23:31, Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io> wrote:
> Great!
>
> My +1 for a new release based on the state of the codebase.
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> > From:Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 22:19
> > To: dev@nutch.apache.org
> > Cc: user@nutch.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
> >
> > Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/> :-)
> >
> > On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com<mailto:
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Good Evening Everyone,
> >
> > A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/>
> >
> > The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> > archive of the sources in:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/ <
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/>
> >
> > Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> > javadoc.jar is available here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Lewis
> >
> > P.S. Here's my +1.
> >
> > --
> > Lewis
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif>
> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/>
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com>
> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> >
> >
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Guys,
-1 for the following reasons :
- bin and src should not have the same content
- bin should only have the content of runtime/local/
- src should not contain runtime/ -> this will be built by Ant
The first point is critical, the second is not.
Julien
On 22 May 2012 23:31, Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io> wrote:
> Great!
>
> My +1 for a new release based on the state of the codebase.
>
>
> -----Original message-----
> > From:Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 22:19
> > To: dev@nutch.apache.org
> > Cc: user@nutch.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
> >
> > Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/> :-)
> >
> > On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com<mailto:
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > Good Evening Everyone,
> >
> > A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/ <
> http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/>
> >
> > The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> > archive of the sources in:
> >
> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/ <
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/>
> >
> > Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> > javadoc.jar is available here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
> >
> > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> > The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >
> > Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Lewis
> >
> > P.S. Here's my +1.
> >
> > --
> > Lewis
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif>
> > Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
> >
> > http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/>
> > http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com>
> > http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> >
> >
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
RE: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io>.
Great!
My +1 for a new release based on the state of the codebase.
-----Original message-----
> From:Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 22:19
> To: dev@nutch.apache.org
> Cc: user@nutch.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
>
> Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/> :-)
>
> On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Good Evening Everyone,
>
> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/>
>
> The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/ <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/>
>
> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> javadoc.jar is available here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lewis
>
> P.S. Here's my +1.
>
> --
> Lewis
>
>
>
> --
> <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif>
> Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com>
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>
>
RE: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Markus Jelsma <ma...@openindex.io>.
Great!
My +1 for a new release based on the state of the codebase.
-----Original message-----
> From:Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Tue 22-May-2012 22:19
> To: dev@nutch.apache.org
> Cc: user@nutch.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
>
> Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/> :-)
>
> On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> Good Evening Everyone,
>
> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/ <http://people.apache.org/%7Elewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/>
>
> The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/ <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/>
>
> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> javadoc.jar is available here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lewis
>
> P.S. Here's my +1.
>
> --
> Lewis
>
>
>
> --
> <http://digitalpebble.com/img/logo.gif>
> Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
>
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ <http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/>
> http://www.digitalpebble.com <http://www.digitalpebble.com>
> http://twitter.com/digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
>
>
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ :-)
On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Good Evening Everyone,
>
> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/
>
> The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/
>
> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> javadoc.jar is available here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lewis
>
> P.S. Here's my +1.
>
> --
> Lewis
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble
Re: Apache Nutch release 1.5 RC2
Posted by Julien Nioche <li...@gmail.com>.
Read http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/nutch-1.5-rc2/ :-)
On 22 May 2012 20:59, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Good Evening Everyone,
>
> A candidate for the Apache Nutch 1.5 release is available at:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~lewismc/apache-gora-0.2/rc1/
>
> The release candidate is a src.zip, bin.zip, src.tar.gz and bin.tar.gz
> archive of the sources in:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/nutch/tags/release-1.5-rc2/
>
> Further, a staged Maven repository of the 1.5 sources.jar and
> javadoc.jar is available here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachenutch-117/
>
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Nutch 1.5.
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> least three +1 Nutch PMC votes are cast.
>
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Nutch 1.5
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>
> Many Thanks and heres to plenty more.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Lewis
>
> P.S. Here's my +1.
>
> --
> Lewis
>
--
*
*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering
http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
http://www.digitalpebble.com
http://twitter.com/digitalpebble