You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2011/07/14 06:47:50 UTC
[VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
RC4 is available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
SVN:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
Maven artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
Website:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove useful:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July 2011.
================
[ ] +1
[ ] -1, with reason
================
Hen
*fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
FYI: The Clirr report contains an extra "-" that breaks the link.
The fixed link is
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr-report.html
Gary
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC4 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>
> SVN:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>
> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
> useful:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>
> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
> 2011.
>
> ================
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, with reason
> ================
>
> Hen
>
> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2011/7/15 Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>:
> The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts
> look good.
>
> I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for the
> sources and javadocs, but this is probably not necessary because the
> artifacts are available at the maven repository.
>
Why have I to go elsewhere besides the ASF to download them? Other
projects have them included in distributive.
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts
> look good.
>
> I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for the
> sources and javadocs, but this is probably not necessary because the
> artifacts are available at the maven repository.
>
> A minor nit: The RAT report on the site lists some files which should not be
> in.
Yeah, I noticed that. It won't be there when I do the real site
post-release. I need to tweak my script so it doesn't store the
artifacts inside the lang directory when building a release :)
>
> So +1!
*cheer*
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
The build runs fine for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. Artifacts
look good.
I was wondering why the binary distribution does not contain jars for
the sources and javadocs, but this is probably not necessary because the
artifacts are available at the maven repository.
A minor nit: The RAT report on the site lists some files which should
not be in.
So +1!
Oliver
Am 14.07.2011 06:47, schrieb Henri Yandell:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC4 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>
> SVN:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>
> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove useful:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>
> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July 2011.
>
> ================
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, with reason
> ================
>
> Hen
>
> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/11 6:13 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> Congrats! Long Live Commons Lang 3.
Great work, all!
Sorry I missed the gong on the VOTE. Release looks fine.
Phil
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
> <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Great achievement Henri,
>> and congrats for the release!!!
>> I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not
>> being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both
>> positively/negatively the vote.
>> I'll do my best to help more next time!
>> Have a nice day, all the best!
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>
>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>> Matt Benson
>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>
>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>> Status:
>>>
>>> Tag copied over.
>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>> to mirrors.
>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>
>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
Congrats! Long Live Commons Lang 3.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Simone Tripodi
<si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Great achievement Henri,
> and congrats for the release!!!
> I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not
> being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both
> positively/negatively the vote.
> I'll do my best to help more next time!
> Have a nice day, all the best!
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>
>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>
>> Status:
>>
>> Tag copied over.
>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>> to mirrors.
>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>> Released in JIRA.
>>
>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Great achievement Henri,
and congrats for the release!!!
I'm so sorry I didn't take part to the review process but honestly not
being familiar with Lang I was a little worried on influencing both
positively/negatively the vote.
I'll do my best to help more next time!
Have a nice day, all the best!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>
>> 6 +1s.
>>
>> Gary Gregory
>> Matt Benson
>> Oliver Heger
>> Jörg Schaible
>> Stephen Colebourne
>> and my own implicit +1.
>>
>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>
> Status:
>
> Tag copied over.
> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
> to mirrors.
> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
> Released in JIRA.
>
> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>
>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>
>> Status:
>>
>> Tag copied over.
>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>> to mirrors.
>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>> Released in JIRA.
>>
>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>
> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>
> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
> sync happen?
>
If not in Nexus, I'd say better safe than sorry.
Matt
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 20 July 2011 07:04, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>
>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>> Matt Benson
>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>
>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>
>>> Status:
>>>
>>> Tag copied over.
>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>> to mirrors.
>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>
>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>
>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>
>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>> sync happen?
>
> I think it's good in Nexus now:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/
>
> Hopefully that means it'll be heading off to maven.central at some point.
>
> The upload is different from the documentation I was pointed to - but
> fairly easy once you've done it. It should be very scriptable. What I
> did was:
>
> svn export the code
> Run 'mvn source:jar javadoc:jar repository:bundle-create'
> Discover that that wasn't good enough as I didn't have the PGP ascs.
> Fair enough. Start again.
>
> Take the maven repo our current release instructions say to use. Copy
> *.jar, *.pom and *.asc into a directory. Go in there and zip the files
> up into the bundle jar. I used zip and the existing bundle jar from
> step 1, but there's no reason why you couldn't just make it. I doubt
> the manifest is important (and using jar to create the jar rather than
> my habit of zip would help there).
>
> Next login to Nexus and go to the Staging Upload. Choose resource
> bundle (ignore the pom + artifacts as that seems to get confused with
> poms and asc files). Add the bundle. That should work and will point
> you to the location in the staging repo.
>
> Go to staging and hit release.
>
> So ideally this can be pretty easy. Do the current build process. Run
> a script (ant, shell, whatever) to take the jar, pom and asc files and
> stick them in a jar. Then upload that to Nexus and hit release.
Or just use "mvn deploy -Prelease" in the first place, as this creates
and packages the jars for you.
> Fingers crossed that I got this in the right place for this to head to
> the right place :)
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:04 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>
>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>> Matt Benson
>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>
>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>
>>> Status:
>>>
>>> Tag copied over.
>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>> to mirrors.
>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>
>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>
>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>
>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>> sync happen?
>
> I think it's good in Nexus now:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/
>
> Hopefully that means it'll be heading off to maven.central at some point.
>
> The upload is different from the documentation I was pointed to - but
> fairly easy once you've done it. It should be very scriptable. What I
> did was:
>
> svn export the code
> Run 'mvn source:jar javadoc:jar repository:bundle-create'
> Discover that that wasn't good enough as I didn't have the PGP ascs.
> Fair enough. Start again.
>
> Take the maven repo our current release instructions say to use. Copy
> *.jar, *.pom and *.asc into a directory. Go in there and zip the files
> up into the bundle jar. I used zip and the existing bundle jar from
> step 1, but there's no reason why you couldn't just make it. I doubt
> the manifest is important (and using jar to create the jar rather than
> my habit of zip would help there).
>
> Next login to Nexus and go to the Staging Upload. Choose resource
> bundle (ignore the pom + artifacts as that seems to get confused with
> poms and asc files). Add the bundle. That should work and will point
> you to the location in the staging repo.
>
> Go to staging and hit release.
>
> So ideally this can be pretty easy. Do the current build process. Run
> a script (ant, shell, whatever) to take the jar, pom and asc files and
> stick them in a jar. Then upload that to Nexus and hit release.
>
> Fingers crossed that I got this in the right place for this to head to
> the right place :)
We're good:
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/3.0/ :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>
>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>
>> Status:
>>
>> Tag copied over.
>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>> to mirrors.
>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>> Released in JIRA.
>>
>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>
> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>
> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
> sync happen?
I think it's good in Nexus now:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/apache/commons/commons-lang3/
Hopefully that means it'll be heading off to maven.central at some point.
The upload is different from the documentation I was pointed to - but
fairly easy once you've done it. It should be very scriptable. What I
did was:
svn export the code
Run 'mvn source:jar javadoc:jar repository:bundle-create'
Discover that that wasn't good enough as I didn't have the PGP ascs.
Fair enough. Start again.
Take the maven repo our current release instructions say to use. Copy
*.jar, *.pom and *.asc into a directory. Go in there and zip the files
up into the bundle jar. I used zip and the existing bundle jar from
step 1, but there's no reason why you couldn't just make it. I doubt
the manifest is important (and using jar to create the jar rather than
my habit of zip would help there).
Next login to Nexus and go to the Staging Upload. Choose resource
bundle (ignore the pom + artifacts as that seems to get confused with
poms and asc files). Add the bundle. That should work and will point
you to the location in the staging repo.
Go to staging and hit release.
So ideally this can be pretty easy. Do the current build process. Run
a script (ant, shell, whatever) to take the jar, pom and asc files and
stick them in a jar. Then upload that to Nexus and hit release.
Fingers crossed that I got this in the right place for this to head to
the right place :)
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 July 2011 21:33, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>>>>>> Status:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>>>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>>>>>> to mirrors.
>>>>>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>>>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>>>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>>>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>>>>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>>>>>> sync happen?
>>>>>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>>>>>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>>>>>> can try asking on repository@.
>>>>> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
>>>>> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
>>>>> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>>>>>
>>>> So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
>>>> Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
>>>
>>> Personally, I would greatly appreciate this. I was planning to try
>>> to imitate the tomcat setup that Mark referred to [1] earlier for
>>> the upcoming [pool] and [dbcp] releases. Unfortunately, in order
>>> for that to work, we have to agree to move back to ibiblio-rysnch
>>> for all of o.a.c. As it stands now, we are stuck with nexus for all
>>> but the old separate groupId components.
>>
>> I managed to use Nexus to upload the Daemon artifacts.
>>
>> IIRC, I created a bundle first, but I think one can upload files separately.
>>
>> However, it's easier to use "mvn deploy" in the first place.
>
> It's LDAP based right? ie) I should be seeing the same upload features
> that you're seeing in the UI?
Nexus uses LDAP.for login; I assume it uses LDAP groups for access
rights once logged in.
e.g. I can see Mina, BSF, HttpComponents and Commons entries.
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:16 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>>>>> Status:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>>>>> to mirrors.
>>>>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>>>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>>>>> sync happen?
>>>>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>>>>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>>>>> can try asking on repository@.
>>>> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
>>>> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
>>>> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>>>>
>>> So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
>>> Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
>>
>> Personally, I would greatly appreciate this. I was planning to try
>> to imitate the tomcat setup that Mark referred to [1] earlier for
>> the upcoming [pool] and [dbcp] releases. Unfortunately, in order
>> for that to work, we have to agree to move back to ibiblio-rysnch
>> for all of o.a.c. As it stands now, we are stuck with nexus for all
>> but the old separate groupId components.
>
> I managed to use Nexus to upload the Daemon artifacts.
>
> IIRC, I created a bundle first, but I think one can upload files separately.
>
> However, it's easier to use "mvn deploy" in the first place.
It's LDAP based right? ie) I should be seeing the same upload features
that you're seeing in the UI?
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 19 July 2011 20:12, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>>>> Status:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>>>> to mirrors.
>>>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>>>> sync happen?
>>>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>>>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>>>> can try asking on repository@.
>>> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
>>> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
>>> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>>>
>> So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
>> Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
>
> Personally, I would greatly appreciate this. I was planning to try
> to imitate the tomcat setup that Mark referred to [1] earlier for
> the upcoming [pool] and [dbcp] releases. Unfortunately, in order
> for that to work, we have to agree to move back to ibiblio-rysnch
> for all of o.a.c. As it stands now, we are stuck with nexus for all
> but the old separate groupId components.
I managed to use Nexus to upload the Daemon artifacts.
IIRC, I created a bundle first, but I think one can upload files separately.
However, it's easier to use "mvn deploy" in the first place.
> [1] http://s.apache.org/qsd*
>
> Phil
> *
>>
>> Matt
>>
>>> Ugh.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/11 11:39 AM, Matt Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>>> Status:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>>> to mirrors.
>>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>>> sync happen?
>>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>>> can try asking on repository@.
>> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
>> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
>> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>>
> So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
> Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
Personally, I would greatly appreciate this. I was planning to try
to imitate the tomcat setup that Mark referred to [1] earlier for
the upcoming [pool] and [dbcp] releases. Unfortunately, in order
for that to work, we have to agree to move back to ibiblio-rysnch
for all of o.a.c. As it stands now, we are stuck with nexus for all
but the old separate groupId components.
[1] http://s.apache.org/qsd*
Phil
*
>
> Matt
>
>> Ugh.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>>> Status:
>>>>>
>>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>>> to mirrors.
>>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>>
>>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>>
>>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>>> sync happen?
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>>> can try asking on repository@.
>>
>> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
>> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
>> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>>
> So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
> Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
Or they could turn on the upload button :)
http://www.sonatype.com/books/nexus-book/reference/using-sect-uploading-artifacts.html
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>>
>>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>>> Matt Benson
>>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>>> Status:
>>>>
>>>> Tag copied over.
>>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>>> to mirrors.
>>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>>
>>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>>
>>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>>> sync happen?
>>
>> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
>> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
>> can try asking on repository@.
>
> Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
> but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
> your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
>
So at this point we're better off ULing through Ivy? Among us, either
Stefan or I would probably be best suited to attempt this.
Matt
> Ugh.
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>>
>>>> 6 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Gary Gregory
>>>> Matt Benson
>>>> Oliver Heger
>>>> Jörg Schaible
>>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>>
>>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>>> Status:
>>>
>>> Tag copied over.
>>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>>> to mirrors.
>>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>>> Released in JIRA.
>>>
>>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
>> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>>
>> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
>> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
>> sync happen?
>
> Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
> the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
> can try asking on repository@.
Looks that way, and it looks like you can't upload artifacts to nexus
but instead have to either write Ivy code or put Maven in charge of
your release management, doing all the staging through nexus.
Ugh.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Phil Steitz <ph...@gmail.com>.
On 7/19/11 9:32 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>>
>>> 6 +1s.
>>>
>>> Gary Gregory
>>> Matt Benson
>>> Oliver Heger
>>> Jörg Schaible
>>> Stephen Colebourne
>>> and my own implicit +1.
>>>
>>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>> Status:
>>
>> Tag copied over.
>> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
>> to mirrors.
>> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
>> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
>> Released in JIRA.
>>
>> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
> It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
>
> Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
> org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
> sync happen?
Unfortunately, I think you have no choice but to use nexus. I think
the whole tree, org.apache.commons is now forced to use nexus. You
can try asking on repository@.
Phil
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 1:52 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>>
>> 6 +1s.
>>
>> Gary Gregory
>> Matt Benson
>> Oliver Heger
>> Jörg Schaible
>> Stephen Colebourne
>> and my own implicit +1.
>>
>> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
>
> Status:
>
> Tag copied over.
> Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
> to mirrors.
> Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
> Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
> Released in JIRA.
>
> Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
It's showing on mirrors now. The Website is synced.
Nothing on maven.org though. This is a new addition to the
org.apache.commons groupId; do we need to ping someone to make the
sync happen?
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
>
> 6 +1s.
>
> Gary Gregory
> Matt Benson
> Oliver Heger
> Jörg Schaible
> Stephen Colebourne
> and my own implicit +1.
>
> I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Status:
Tag copied over.
Distributions uploaded. Synced on Apache machines, propagating out
to mirrors.
Maven contents in the sync directory, waiting to show up on maven.org.
Website updated (including Jörg's suggestions). Sync pending.
Released in JIRA.
Waiting on maven.org and the mirrors before announcing.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
[RESULT] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Vote passes [!!!!!!!!!]
6 +1s.
Gary Gregory
Matt Benson
Oliver Heger
Jörg Schaible
Stephen Colebourne
and my own implicit +1.
I'll start dredging up the 'how to push a release' knowledge tonight :)
Hen
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC4 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>
> SVN:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>
> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove useful:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>
> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July 2011.
>
> ================
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, with reason
> ================
>
> Hen
>
> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Am 14.07.2011 21:43, schrieb Matt Benson:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Henri Yandell<fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger
>> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>>> Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory<ga...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>
>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Potential argument against: it's new code, and only broken for
>>>> surrogate planes, so won't affect that many users.
>>>> Potential argument for: it's new code, and releasing it broken may
>>>> harm its reputation from the outset.
>>>>
>>>> -0 to the release from me.
>>>
>>> Well, if the fix is already in SVN, I would also prefer to include it in the
>>> release. I hope, Hen does not loose his patience...
>>
>> I have a 3 month old, a 3 year old and a 6 year old. There are entire
>> worlds left of my patience to be explored before you guys even get
>> close to it being lost :)
>>
>> That said - if it's not a binary compatibility issue I would prefer to
>> release now and then release again with a 3.0.1. My firm intent is to
>> keep shoving releases at commons-dev@ as fast as it can stomach them.
>> I can promise that if we roll again there will be another minor bug
>> [for example there's already 11 bugs in 3.x, with
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-708 being one that needs
>> fixing quickly in a bugfix release].
>>
>
> If we're releasing early and often I retract my quasi-objection,
> though I haven't yet eyeballed the RC such that I can conscientiously
> give a +1 either. And I really don't mind RMing 3.0.x either, dearth
> of round tuits notwithstanding, but I need somebody to hold my hand
> and show me that the big bad Maven isn't going to get me.
I also agree with Hen's argument. Just checking the release and going to
vote in some minutes.
Oliver
>
> Matt
>
>> Hen
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger
> <ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
>> Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory<ga...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>
>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Potential argument against: it's new code, and only broken for
>>> surrogate planes, so won't affect that many users.
>>> Potential argument for: it's new code, and releasing it broken may
>>> harm its reputation from the outset.
>>>
>>> -0 to the release from me.
>>
>> Well, if the fix is already in SVN, I would also prefer to include it in the
>> release. I hope, Hen does not loose his patience...
>
> I have a 3 month old, a 3 year old and a 6 year old. There are entire
> worlds left of my patience to be explored before you guys even get
> close to it being lost :)
>
> That said - if it's not a binary compatibility issue I would prefer to
> release now and then release again with a 3.0.1. My firm intent is to
> keep shoving releases at commons-dev@ as fast as it can stomach them.
> I can promise that if we roll again there will be another minor bug
> [for example there's already 11 bugs in 3.x, with
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-708 being one that needs
> fixing quickly in a bugfix release].
>
If we're releasing early and often I retract my quasi-objection,
though I haven't yet eyeballed the RC such that I can conscientiously
give a +1 either. And I really don't mind RMing 3.0.x either, dearth
of round tuits notwithstanding, but I need somebody to hold my hand
and show me that the big bad Maven isn't going to get me.
Matt
> Hen
>
> Hen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Oliver Heger
<ol...@oliver-heger.de> wrote:
> Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory<ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>
>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>
>>
>> Potential argument against: it's new code, and only broken for
>> surrogate planes, so won't affect that many users.
>> Potential argument for: it's new code, and releasing it broken may
>> harm its reputation from the outset.
>>
>> -0 to the release from me.
>
> Well, if the fix is already in SVN, I would also prefer to include it in the
> release. I hope, Hen does not loose his patience...
I have a 3 month old, a 3 year old and a 6 year old. There are entire
worlds left of my patience to be explored before you guys even get
close to it being lost :)
That said - if it's not a binary compatibility issue I would prefer to
release now and then release again with a 3.0.1. My firm intent is to
keep shoving releases at commons-dev@ as fast as it can stomach them.
I can promise that if we roll again there will be another minor bug
[for example there's already 11 bugs in 3.x, with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-708 being one that needs
fixing quickly in a bugfix release].
Hen
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Am 14.07.2011 21:01, schrieb Matt Benson:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory<ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>
>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>
>
> Potential argument against: it's new code, and only broken for
> surrogate planes, so won't affect that many users.
> Potential argument for: it's new code, and releasing it broken may
> harm its reputation from the outset.
>
> -0 to the release from me.
Well, if the fix is already in SVN, I would also prefer to include it in
the release. I hope, Hen does not loose his patience...
Oliver
>
> Matt
>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell<fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>
>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>
>>> SVN:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>
>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>
>>> Website:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>
>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
>>> useful:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>
>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
>>> 2011.
>>>
>>> ================
>>> [ ] +1
>>> [ ] -1, with reason
>>> ================
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Gary
>>
>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> http://garygregory.com/
>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>
> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>
Potential argument against: it's new code, and only broken for
surrogate planes, so won't affect that many users.
Potential argument for: it's new code, and releasing it broken may
harm its reputation from the outset.
-0 to the release from me.
Matt
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>
>> RC4 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>
>> SVN:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>
>> Website:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>
>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
>> useful:
>>
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>
>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
>> 2011.
>>
>> ================
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] -1, with reason
>> ================
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
Apologies, I haven't had much time in the past few months and haven't
really been following. I'm sure you guys have done a great job and am
happy to leave the vote up to you.
Niall
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Gary.
>
> So 4 +1s.
>
> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>> -1 :)
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>> a
>>>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>> we
>>>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>> is
>>>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>> IMO
>>>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>> want
>>>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>> baked,
>>>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>> I do
>>>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>> 3.0.
>>>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>> > testing.
>>>> >
>>>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>> go
>>>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>> POV.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>> >
>>>> > Gary
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>> to
>>>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Gary
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> RC4 is available here:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> SVN:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Maven artifacts:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Website:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>> prove
>>>> >> >> useful:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>> July
>>>> >> >> 2011.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> ================
>>>> >> >> [ ] +1
>>>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason
>>>> >> >> ================
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Hen
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>> >> >> effort*
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > Thank you,
>>>> >> > Gary
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> >> > http://garygregory.com/
>>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> >> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Thank you,
>>>> > Gary
>>>> >
>>>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> > http://garygregory.com/
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Gary
>>
>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> http://garygregory.com/
>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by David Karlsen <da...@gmail.com>.
2011/7/19 Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>
> As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
> it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
> source.
>
And it is:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/trunk/pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>commons-io</groupId>
<artifactId>commons-io</artifactId>
<version>2.0.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
along with the other test deps...
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org> wrote:
> As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
> it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
> source.
>
It is specified in the test scope in the POM.
Gary
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
> >> releasing 3.0.
> >>
> >> Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
> >> Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
> >> something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
> >> do.
> >>
> >
> > We depend on JUnit and EasyMock for testing, so I really think it is OK
> to
> > also depend on [io] for testing as well. C&P'ing code is lame in this
> case
> > IMO.
> >
> > Gary
> >
> >
> >> Hen
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> >> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
> >> > StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
> >> > been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
> >> > testing)
> >> >
> >> > Stephen
> >> >
> >> > On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I'm willing to vote +1
> >> >>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
> >> >>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to
> an
> >> >>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Stephen,
> >> >>
> >> >> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
> >> >> builds before my commit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Gary
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Stephen
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>> Thanks Gary.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> So 4 +1s.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
> >> >>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Hen
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <
> >> garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I
> >> remove my
> >> >>>>> -1 :)
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <
> flamefew@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that
> if
> >> you
> >> >>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you
> continually
> >> sit
> >> >>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
> >> >>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> Hen
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <
> >> garydgregory@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and
> >> there is
> >> >>>>>>> a
> >> >>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It
> feels
> >> like
> >> >>>>>>> we
> >> >>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and
> >> validation
> >> >>>>>>> is
> >> >>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may
> vary
> >> using
> >> >>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a
> good
> >> reason
> >> >>>>>>> IMO
> >> >>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I
> do
> >> not
> >> >>>>>>> want
> >> >>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not
> >> fully
> >> >>>>>>> baked,
> >> >>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a
> >> 3.0.1, but
> >> >>>>>>> I do
> >> >>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already
> fixed
> >> for
> >> >>>>>>> 3.0.
> >> >>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating,
> coding,
> >> and
> >> >>>>>>>> testing.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be
> >> happy to
> >> >>>>>>> go
> >> >>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express
> my
> >> full
> >> >>>>>>> POV.
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <
> >> flamefew@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on
> >> LANG-720.
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <
> >> garydgregory@gmail.com
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it
> makes
> >> sense
> >> >>>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <
> >> flamefew@gmail.com>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Website:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that
> may
> >> >>>>>>> prove
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> useful:
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500
> GMT
> >> 16
> >> >>>>>>> July
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> Hen
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the
> Lang
> >> 3.0
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> effort*
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >>>>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >> >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> --
> >> >>>>>> Thank you,
> >> >>>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >> >>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >> >>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> --
> >> >>>>> Thank you,
> >> >>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >> >>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >> >>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> >
> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> > http://garygregory.com/
> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Paul Benedict <pb...@apache.org>.
As long as Commons IO is marked as a test dependency, I am okay with
it. I just don't want it to be a compile-time dependency for the main
source.
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
>> releasing 3.0.
>>
>> Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
>> Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
>> something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
>> do.
>>
>
> We depend on JUnit and EasyMock for testing, so I really think it is OK to
> also depend on [io] for testing as well. C&P'ing code is lame in this case
> IMO.
>
> Gary
>
>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne
>> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>> > StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
>> > been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
>> > testing)
>> >
>> > Stephen
>> >
>> > On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> I'm willing to vote +1
>> >>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
>> >>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>> >>>
>> >>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>> >>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>> >>
>> >> Hi Stephen,
>> >>
>> >> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
>> >> builds before my commit.
>> >>
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Stephen
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> Thanks Gary.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So 4 +1s.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>> >>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Hen
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <
>> garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I
>> remove my
>> >>>>> -1 :)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if
>> you
>> >>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually
>> sit
>> >>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>> >>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hen
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <
>> garydgregory@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and
>> there is
>> >>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels
>> like
>> >>>>>>> we
>> >>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and
>> validation
>> >>>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary
>> using
>> >>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good
>> reason
>> >>>>>>> IMO
>> >>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do
>> not
>> >>>>>>> want
>> >>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not
>> fully
>> >>>>>>> baked,
>> >>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a
>> 3.0.1, but
>> >>>>>>> I do
>> >>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed
>> for
>> >>>>>>> 3.0.
>> >>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding,
>> and
>> >>>>>>>> testing.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be
>> happy to
>> >>>>>>> go
>> >>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my
>> full
>> >>>>>>> POV.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <
>> flamefew@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on
>> LANG-720.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <
>> garydgregory@gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes
>> sense
>> >>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <
>> flamefew@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Website:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>> >>>>>>> prove
>> >>>>>>>>>>> useful:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT
>> 16
>> >>>>>>> July
>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
>> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang
>> 3.0
>> >>>>>>>>>>> effort*
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> --
>> >>>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> >>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Thank you,
>> >>>>> Gary
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> >>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> >>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by David Karlsen <da...@gmail.com>.
2011/7/19 Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
> > releasing 3.0.
> >
> > Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
> > Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
> > something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
> > do.
> >
>
> We depend on JUnit and EasyMock for testing, so I really think it is OK to
> also depend on [io] for testing as well. C&P'ing code is lame in this case
> IMO.
>
+1
--
David J. M. Karlsen - http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidkarlsen
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
> releasing 3.0.
>
> Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
> Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
> something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
> do.
>
We depend on JUnit and EasyMock for testing, so I really think it is OK to
also depend on [io] for testing as well. C&P'ing code is lame in this case
IMO.
Gary
> Hen
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne
> <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
> > StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
> > been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
> > testing)
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I'm willing to vote +1
> >>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
> >>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
> >>>
> >>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
> >>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
> >>
> >> Hi Stephen,
> >>
> >> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
> >> builds before my commit.
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Stephen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Thanks Gary.
> >>>>
> >>>> So 4 +1s.
> >>>>
> >>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
> >>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
> >>>>
> >>>> Hen
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <
> garydgregory@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I
> remove my
> >>>>> -1 :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Gary
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <flamefew@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if
> you
> >>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually
> sit
> >>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
> >>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hen
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <
> garydgregory@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and
> there is
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels
> like
> >>>>>>> we
> >>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and
> validation
> >>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary
> using
> >>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good
> reason
> >>>>>>> IMO
> >>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do
> not
> >>>>>>> want
> >>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not
> fully
> >>>>>>> baked,
> >>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a
> 3.0.1, but
> >>>>>>> I do
> >>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed
> for
> >>>>>>> 3.0.
> >>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding,
> and
> >>>>>>>> testing.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be
> happy to
> >>>>>>> go
> >>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my
> full
> >>>>>>> POV.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <
> flamefew@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on
> LANG-720.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <
> garydgregory@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes
> sense
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <
> flamefew@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Website:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
> >>>>>>> prove
> >>>>>>>>>>> useful:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT
> 16
> >>>>>>> July
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
> >>>>>>>>>>> ================
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hen
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang
> 3.0
> >>>>>>>>>>> effort*
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>> Gary
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> >>>>> http://garygregory.com/
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Interesting issue; though thankfully it's post RC4 so not an issue wrt
releasing 3.0.
Assuming (for argument's sake) that IO Test depends on Lang & Lang
Test depends on IO; is this bad? I'm not convinced it is. Dealing with
something like that is something the build system needs to know how to
do.
Hen
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Stephen Colebourne
<sc...@joda.org> wrote:
> StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
> been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
> testing)
>
> Stephen
>
> On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm willing to vote +1
>>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
>>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>>>
>>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>>
>> Hi Stephen,
>>
>> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
>> builds before my commit.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks Gary.
>>>>
>>>> So 4 +1s.
>>>>
>>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>>>>> -1 :)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>>>>> we
>>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>>>>> IMO
>>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>>>>> want
>>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>>>>> baked,
>>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>>>>> I do
>>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>>>>> 3.0.
>>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>>>>> go
>>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>>>>> POV.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>>>>> prove
>>>>>>>>>>> useful:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>>>>> July
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
>>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>>>>>>>>> effort*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>.
StringEscapeUtils test includes IOUtils, which it shouldn't. (If its
been added as a dependency, then it needs to be removed, even for
testing)
Stephen
On 18 July 2011 23:41, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
>
>> I'm willing to vote +1
>> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
>> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>>
>> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
>> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
> builds before my commit.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>>
>> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thanks Gary.
>>>
>>> So 4 +1s.
>>>
>>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>>>> -1 :)
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>>>> we
>>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>>>> is
>>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>>>> IMO
>>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>>>> want
>>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>>>> baked,
>>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>>>> I do
>>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>>>> 3.0.
>>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>>>> go
>>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>>>> POV.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>>>> prove
>>>>>>>>>> useful:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>>>> July
>>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
>>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>>>>>>>> effort*
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 18, 2011, at 18:36, Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org> wrote:
> I'm willing to vote +1
> Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
> changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
>
> I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
> IOUtils reference that shouldn't be
Hi Stephen,
Can you specify what your error is? I check both the maven and ant
builds before my commit.
Gary
>
> Stephen
>
>
> On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks Gary.
>>
>> So 4 +1s.
>>
>> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
>> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>>> -1 :)
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hen
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>>> a
>>>>>> known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>>> we
>>>>>> are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>>> is
>>>>>> painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>>>> custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>>> IMO
>>>>>> to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>>> want
>>>>>> to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>>> baked,
>>>>>> especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>>> I do
>>>>>> not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>>> 3.0.
>>>>>> It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>>>> testing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>>> go
>>>>>> with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>>> POV.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> RC4 is available here:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> SVN:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maven artifacts:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Website:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>>> prove
>>>>>>>>> useful:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>>> July
>>>>>>>>> 2011.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, with reason
>>>>>>>>> ================
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hen
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>>>>>>> effort*
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Thank you,
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@joda.org>.
I'm willing to vote +1
Although I haven't checked every recent change, but AFAIK recent
changes have been minor and my previous issues are resolved.
I would note that the svn as of right now does not compile, due to an
IOUtils reference that shouldn't be there.
Stephen
On 16 July 2011 01:18, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Gary.
>
> So 4 +1s.
>
> Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
> (apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
>
> Hen
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
>> -1 :)
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>>
>>>> Hen
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>>> a
>>>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>>> we
>>>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>>> is
>>>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>>> IMO
>>>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>>> want
>>>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>>> baked,
>>>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>>> I do
>>>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>>> 3.0.
>>>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>>> > testing.
>>>> >
>>>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>>> go
>>>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>>> POV.
>>>> >
>>>> > Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>>> >
>>>> > Gary
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>>> >
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>>> to
>>>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Gary
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> > wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> RC4 is available here:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> SVN:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Maven artifacts:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Website:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>>> prove
>>>> >> >> useful:
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>>> July
>>>> >> >> 2011.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> ================
>>>> >> >> [ ] +1
>>>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason
>>>> >> >> ================
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Hen
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>>> >> >> effort*
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > Thank you,
>>>> >> > Gary
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> >> > http://garygregory.com/
>>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> >> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Thank you,
>>>> > Gary
>>>> >
>>>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>>> > http://garygregory.com/
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thank you,
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>> http://garygregory.com/
>>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Gary
>>
>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> http://garygregory.com/
>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Gary.
So 4 +1s.
Stephen, Niall, Paul, Phil, Sebb, James - nudge to consider voting
(apologies if I missed anyone else who has committed to Lang 3.0)?
Hen
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
> -1 :)
>
> Gary
>
>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>>
>>> Hen
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>>> a
>>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>>> we
>>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>>> is
>>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>>> IMO
>>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>>> want
>>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>>> baked,
>>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>>> I do
>>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>>> 3.0.
>>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>>> > testing.
>>> >
>>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>>> go
>>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>>> POV.
>>> >
>>> > Thank you for reading and talking :)
>>> >
>>> > Gary
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>>> >>
>>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>>> to
>>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Gary
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> RC4 is available here:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> SVN:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Maven artifacts:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Website:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>>> prove
>>> >> >> useful:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>>> July
>>> >> >> 2011.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> ================
>>> >> >> [ ] +1
>>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason
>>> >> >> ================
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Hen
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>>> >> >> effort*
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > Thank you,
>>> >> > Gary
>>> >> >
>>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>> >> > http://garygregory.com/
>>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Thank you,
>>> > Gary
>>> >
>>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>>> > http://garygregory.com/
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thank you,
>> Gary
>>
>> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> http://garygregory.com/
>> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
That's true too. In the spirit of release early, release often, I remove my
-1 :)
Gary
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Less that it is painful (though I agree that it is), more that if you
>> hold up a release for every bug that comes in then you continually sit
>> in a non-releasing state. We have a really bad habit of that in
>> Commons, constantly polishing and polishing before a release.
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Here is my main issue: we are releasing a major new version and there is
>> a
>> > known bug reported by a user which has been fixed in SVN. It feels like
>> we
>> > are unwilling to cut a new RC because our build process and validation
>> is
>> > painful (it is so in my experience at least, your mileage may vary using
>> > custom scripts, Nexus, or other incantations.) This is not a good reason
>> IMO
>> > to avoid rebuilding. In the case of a major release like 3.0, I do not
>> want
>> > to leave a bad taste in a user's mouth with a class that is not fully
>> baked,
>> > especially in code new to 3.0. I like that we are planning a 3.0.1, but
>> I do
>> > not see why we should not include something that is already fixed for
>> 3.0.
>> > It's not like this issue needs more time on investigating, coding, and
>> > testing.
>> >
>> > Now, if you all really think I am being unreasonable, I'll be happy to
>> go
>> > with the flow and reverse -1, but for now, I wanted to express my full
>> POV.
>> >
>> > Thank you for reading and talking :)
>> >
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Waiting on you to determine whether your -1 is still there on LANG-720.
>> >>
>> >> Then need to poke Niall, Stephen et al to do a review :)
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgregory@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > -1, let's pick up the committed fix for
>> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
>> >> >
>> >> > I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense
>> to
>> >> > polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
>> >> >
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> RC4 is available here:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> SVN:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Maven artifacts:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Website:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may
>> prove
>> >> >> useful:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16
>> July
>> >> >> 2011.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ================
>> >> >> [ ] +1
>> >> >> [ ] -1, with reason
>> >> >> ================
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Hen
>> >> >>
>> >> >> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>> >> >> effort*
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Thank you,
>> >> > Gary
>> >> >
>> >> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> >> > http://garygregory.com/
>> >> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> >> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thank you,
>> > Gary
>> >
>> > http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
>> > http://garygregory.com/
>> > http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
>> > http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Gary
>
> http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
> http://garygregory.com/
> http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
> http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
-1, let's pick up the committed fix for
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-720
I recall seeing traffic in the escape/unescape area so it makes sense to
polish this new code as much as possible IMO.
Gary
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC4 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>
> SVN:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>
> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
> useful:
>
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-clirr--report.html
>
> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
> 2011.
>
> ================
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, with reason
> ================
>
> Hen
>
> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0 effort*
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
Thank you,
Gary
http://garygregory.wordpress.com/
http://garygregory.com/
http://people.apache.org/~ggregory/
http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@scalaris.com>.
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>
> wrote:
[snip]
>> As usual I build from the source tarball with my compiler zoo.
>>
>> A test fails with IBM JDK 6, because the test makes wrong assumptions
>> about the implementation details of ArrayList delivered by the runtime:
>> ============ %< ===========
>> Failed tests:
>>
testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToStringBuilderTest):
>> null
>>
expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>},size=0],modCount=0]>
>> but
>>
was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=0,lastIndex=0,array={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>}],modCount=0]>
>> ============ %< ===========
>
> Can you open up a JIRA Item for this one? I don't think it's a release
> blocker, but we should fix it in 3.0.1.
DONE, LANG-727
[snip]
>> 5/ Distribution Management: Report should be disabled, links are not
>> valid for users
>
> Any idea how?
This is a result from the project-info-reports plugin. It seems we have
currently no explicit configuration for it, but the individual report can be
selected:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-project-info-reports-
plugin/examples/selective-project-info-reports.html
These info reports exist and are all generated by default:
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-project-info-reports-plugin/plugin-
info.html
Since the Distribution Management report in its current form does not make
sense for any Commons component, we might rather configure it in the POM
parent.
>> 6/ Changes Report: Claims 3.0 to be unreleased
>
> Yeah, need to put whatever date the release is when pushing the final site
> up.
>
>> None of this is a blocker though, therefore +1
>
> *cheer* :)
Hehehe.
> I'll aim to hit all before release (bar distribution management); but
> anyone else should feel free to tweak the site. Whenever we
> successfully release I'll deploy a site from trunk instead of the RC'd
> version.
Thought so.
Cheers,
Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Hen,
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>>
>> RC4 is available here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>>
>> SVN:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>>
>> Maven artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>>
>> Website:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>>
>> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
>> useful:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-
> clirr--report.html
>>
>> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
>> 2011.
>>
>> ================
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] -1, with reason
>> ================
>>
>> Hen
>>
>> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
>> effort*
>
> As usual I build from the source tarball with my compiler zoo.
>
> A test fails with IBM JDK 6, because the test makes wrong assumptions about
> the implementation details of ArrayList delivered by the runtime:
> ============ %< ===========
> Failed tests:
> testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToStringBuilderTest):
> null
> expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>},size=0],modCount=0]>
> but
> was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=0,lastIndex=0,array={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>}],modCount=0]>
> ============ %< ===========
Can you open up a JIRA Item for this one? I don't think it's a release
blocker, but we should fix it in 3.0.1.
> You're already fixed the issues of the checkstyle report in trunk.
>
>
> Site problems:
> ==============
>
> 1/ Users Guide, 1: The description misses the fact that Lang3 can be used
> side-by-side with a previous version
Very good point.
> 2/ Users Guide, 2: Head of page contains a link for "lang3.exception.*", but
> no section exists.
Good catch.
> 3/ Release History/release notes for 3.0: The "coloring" fails in the bottom
> of the page due to single quotes in the text
Ditto :)
> 4/ Building: Misses the link for the upgrade notes to 3.0 in the list
Good catch - forgot this page existed :)
> 5/ Distribution Management: Report should be disabled, links are not valid
> for users
Any idea how?
> 6/ Changes Report: Claims 3.0 to be unreleased
Yeah, need to put whatever date the release is when pushing the final site up.
> None of this is a blocker though, therefore +1
*cheer* :)
I'll aim to hit all before release (bar distribution management); but
anyone else should feel free to tweak the site. Whenever we
successfully release I'll deploy a site from trunk instead of the RC'd
version.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [LANG] Release Commons Lang 3.0 (based on RC4)
Posted by Jörg Schaible <jo...@gmx.de>.
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Lang is ready to consider 3.0 release again.
>
> RC4 is available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/
>
> SVN:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/lang/tags/LANG_3_0_RC4/
>
> Maven artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/maven/
>
> Website:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/
>
> Note that there is a 2.6->3.0 Clirr report in the site that may prove
> useful:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang3-3.0-RC4/site/lang2-lang3-
clirr--report.html
>
> This vote will close no sooner than in 72 hours time, 0500 GMT 16 July
> 2011.
>
> ================
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1, with reason
> ================
>
> Hen
>
> *fingers crossed - two of my children are younger than the Lang 3.0
> effort*
As usual I build from the source tarball with my compiler zoo.
A test fails with IBM JDK 6, because the test makes wrong assumptions about
the implementation details of ArrayList delivered by the runtime:
============ %< ===========
Failed tests:
testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToStringBuilderTest):
null
expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>},size=0],modCount=0]>
but
was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=0,lastIndex=0,array={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>}],modCount=0]>
============ %< ===========
You're already fixed the issues of the checkstyle report in trunk.
Site problems:
==============
1/ Users Guide, 1: The description misses the fact that Lang3 can be used
side-by-side with a previous version
2/ Users Guide, 2: Head of page contains a link for "lang3.exception.*", but
no section exists.
3/ Release History/release notes for 3.0: The "coloring" fails in the bottom
of the page due to single quotes in the text
4/ Building: Misses the link for the upgrade notes to 3.0 in the list
5/ Distribution Management: Report should be disabled, links are not valid
for users
6/ Changes Report: Claims 3.0 to be unreleased
None of this is a blocker though, therefore +1
Cheers,
Jörg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org