You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by "Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/27 06:02:36 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (NUTCH-1297) it is better for fetchItemQueues to select items from greater queues first

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13833461#comment-13833461 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on NUTCH-1297:
-----------------------------------------

I think [~behnam.nikbakht] is gone.

But is this a good feature anyway?  A host queue may be long because the site is responding slowly.  In that case, do you really want to give priority to fetching from this slow site?


> it is better for fetchItemQueues to select items from greater queues first
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-1297
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1297
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fetcher
>    Affects Versions: 1.4
>            Reporter: behnam nikbakht
>              Labels: fetch_queues
>             Fix For: 1.8
>
>         Attachments: NUTCH-1297.patch
>
>
> there is a situation that if we have multiple hosts in fetch, and size of hosts were different, large hosts have a long delay until the getFetchItem() in FetchItemQueues class select a url from them, so we can give them more priority.
> for example if we have 10 url from host1 and 1000 url from host2, and have 5 threads, if all threads first selected from host1, we had more delay on fetch rather than a situation that threads first selected from host2, and when host 2 was busy, then selected from host1.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)