You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> on 2014/02/11 11:56:38 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
while COUCHDB-1986 is not closed yet but all tests pass so far. Imo we
should relaunch a new release vote including
Imo we can't know if COUCHDB-1986 is really fixed for now due to the
comment, the fact that all tests pass using the combination of the 2
commits (bit not with one or the other alone) is mysterious. However
they are fixing real issues so i would release now with them instead
of waiting more.
Thoughts?
- benoit
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Nick North <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After some help from @dch following a brain failure during Windows build:
>
> sha, md5, sig: OK
>
> Windows 8.1 EN x64, with Erlang R14B04, R15B03-1, R16B02
> Verify install OK for all three builds. Futon tests all OK except for
> show_documents, which fails on all three. But then it also fails on my
> 1.5.0 build, so not a reason to block the release.
>
> Nick
>
>
> On 22 January 2014 11:05, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>
>> On 21 January 2014 20:50, Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Dear community,
>> >
>> > After taking a little over a month to work out some issues, I would
>> > finally like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1.
>> >
>> > Changes since last round:
>> >
>> > *
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
>> >
>> > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
>> > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
>> > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
>> > stuck in!
>> >
>> > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>> >
>> > wget
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
>> > wget
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
>> > wget
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
>> > wget
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
>> > wget
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
>> >
>> > Please follow the test procedure here:
>> >
>> > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
>> >
>> > Please remember that "rc.1" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
>> > these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
>> >
>> > Please cast your votes now.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>> > Dirkjan
>>
>> \o/ thanks Dirkjan!
>>
>> -1 due to replication test failure, let's see if we can find a
>> solution for that.
>>
>> OK: sha, md5
>> OK: sig valid
>> OK: git diff with source tree
>>
>> Windows 7 EN x64
>> Erlang/OTP R14B04
>> OK - verify install ok, snappy NIFs ok, futon tests fine too
>>
>> FreeBSD 10.0 x64:
>> Erlang R16B02:
>> FAIL - 04-replication-large-atts.t
>>
>> OS X 10.9.1 x64
>> Erlang R16B03, R15B03-1
>> FAIL - 04-replication-large-atts.t
>> I can't test on R14B04 anymore as kerl won't build it without gcc AFAICT.
>>
>> Overall I am -1 on the replication test, but totally bamboozled why
>> this should fail.
>>
>> A+
>> Dave
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
+1
On 11 February 2014 11:56, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> while COUCHDB-1986 is not closed yet but all tests pass so far. Imo we
> should relaunch a new release vote including
>
> Imo we can't know if COUCHDB-1986 is really fixed for now due to the
> comment, the fact that all tests pass using the combination of the 2
> commits (bit not with one or the other alone) is mysterious. However
> they are fixing real issues so i would release now with them instead
> of waiting more.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> - benoit
>
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:29 PM, Nick North <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > After some help from @dch following a brain failure during Windows build:
> >
> > sha, md5, sig: OK
> >
> > Windows 8.1 EN x64, with Erlang R14B04, R15B03-1, R16B02
> > Verify install OK for all three builds. Futon tests all OK except for
> > show_documents, which fails on all three. But then it also fails on my
> > 1.5.0 build, so not a reason to block the release.
> >
> > Nick
> >
> >
> > On 22 January 2014 11:05, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 21 January 2014 20:50, Dirkjan Ochtman <dj...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > Dear community,
> >> >
> >> > After taking a little over a month to work out some issues, I would
> >> > finally like to release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1.
> >> >
> >> > Changes since last round:
> >> >
> >> > *
> >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/1.6.x
> >> >
> >> > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> >> > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the
> >> > release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so get
> >> > stuck in!
> >> >
> >> > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
> >> >
> >> > wget
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz
> >> > wget
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.asc
> >> > wget
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.ish
> >> > wget
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.md5
> >> > wget
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/1.6.0/rc.1/apache-couchdb-1.6.0.tar.gz.sha
> >> >
> >> > Please follow the test procedure here:
> >> >
> >> > http://wiki.apache.org/couchdb/Test_procedure
> >> >
> >> > Please remember that "rc.1" is an annotation. If the vote passes,
> >> > these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 1.6.0.
> >> >
> >> > Please cast your votes now.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >> > Dirkjan
> >>
> >> \o/ thanks Dirkjan!
> >>
> >> -1 due to replication test failure, let's see if we can find a
> >> solution for that.
> >>
> >> OK: sha, md5
> >> OK: sig valid
> >> OK: git diff with source tree
> >>
> >> Windows 7 EN x64
> >> Erlang/OTP R14B04
> >> OK - verify install ok, snappy NIFs ok, futon tests fine too
> >>
> >> FreeBSD 10.0 x64:
> >> Erlang R16B02:
> >> FAIL - 04-replication-large-atts.t
> >>
> >> OS X 10.9.1 x64
> >> Erlang R16B03, R15B03-1
> >> FAIL - 04-replication-large-atts.t
> >> I can't test on R14B04 anymore as kerl won't build it without gcc
> AFAICT.
> >>
> >> Overall I am -1 on the replication test, but totally bamboozled why
> >> this should fail.
> >>
> >> A+
> >> Dave
> >>
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Nick North <no...@gmail.com>.
I'm up for some (more) debugging to try to track down the large attachments
problem. This is a fairly busy week, but I am free all day Wednesday if
that works. I'm also setting up a local FreeBSD machine to try it out
myself, but Windows Hyper-V is giving some problems.
Nick
On 14 March 2014 18:57, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> On 14 March 2014 14:53, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>
> wrote:
> >> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> >>> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
> >>> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
> >>> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
> >>> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
> >>> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
> >>
> >> Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
> >> the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
> >>
> >
> >
> > did you figured?
> >
> > Also what is the status of this release?
> >
> > - benoit
>
> FWIW I still get the replication failures on FreeBSD + master, even if
> we sprinkle in the various possible fixes out there.
>
> I'm concerned that there's some underlying issue that is worse on
> FreeBSD but still exists on other platforms -- one of the symptoms is
> an exploding RSS memory set during replication.
>
> If somebody feels like doing some peer debugging next week we might be
> able to track this down.
>
> Worth noting, master works for me fine on OSX but not 1.6.
>
> I propose to the illustrious Release Manager (Long May They Reign) to
> dump the 1.6.x branch unceremoniously & cut a new one from current
> master, assuming Fauxton etc are able to work with this?
>
> A+
> Dave
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> I propose to the illustrious Release Manager (Long May They Reign) to
> dump the 1.6.x branch unceremoniously & cut a new one from current
> master, assuming Fauxton etc are able to work with this?
Why do we think master will work and 1.6.x won't? If we know why, why
not cherry-pick those?
(I have nothing against cutting a new branch, I think it would make a
lot of sense... but we really should be better about actually tracking
down failures.)
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 14 March 2014 14:53, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
>> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
>>> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
>>> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
>>> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
>>> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
>>
>> Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
>> the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
>>
>
>
> did you figured?
>
> Also what is the status of this release?
>
> - benoit
FWIW I still get the replication failures on FreeBSD + master, even if
we sprinkle in the various possible fixes out there.
I'm concerned that there's some underlying issue that is worse on
FreeBSD but still exists on other platforms -- one of the symptoms is
an exploding RSS memory set during replication.
If somebody feels like doing some peer debugging next week we might be
able to track this down.
Worth noting, master works for me fine on OSX but not 1.6.
I propose to the illustrious Release Manager (Long May They Reign) to
dump the 1.6.x branch unceremoniously & cut a new one from current
master, assuming Fauxton etc are able to work with this?
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
>> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
>> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
>> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
>> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
>
> Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
> the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
>
did you figured?
Also what is the status of this release?
- benoit
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Nick North <no...@gmail.com>.
Not at my PC just now so can't check the exact branch name that speeds up attachment parsing, but I think it's 1953. It does seem to make some difference to that test (though it's not a fix), and is in master but I wasn't sure if I should merge it to 1.6, so it is not currently there.
Nick
> On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:24, Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de> wrote:
>
>> On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
>> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
>> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
>> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
>> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
>> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
>
> Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
> the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@posteo.de>.
On 03/05/2014 11:06 AM, Andy Wenk wrote:
> * I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
> * I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
> and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
> * rerun with the last one results also in the same error
> * I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
Does anybody have an idea about what change that is in master but not in
the 1.6 branch could make 04-replication-large-atts.t not fail anymore?
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
Hi,
Dirkjan asked me if we are ready for 1.6-rc.2 via IRC. So there is still
the issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1986 and I am not
quite sure, what my findings mean for running a next rc. The summary of my
findings are:
* I tested against master 5989bb324a and all tests pass
* I tested against 1986-fix-ibrowse-infinite-async-timeout b35884580
and ./test/etap/200-view-group-no-db-leaks.t fails
* rerun with the last one results also in the same error
* I tested against 1.6 branch and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
* I tested against 1994-merge-rcouch branch and make check fails
* I tested 1.6 with recbuf -define(RECBUF_SIZE, 8192 * 4).
and 04-replication-large-atts.t fails
* I tested 1.6 with recbuf -define(RECBUF_SIZE, 8192 * 8). and all tests
pass
Everything has been tested on my Mac Book (OS X 10.9.2) with
Erlang R16B03-1 (erts-5.10.4)
Am I the only person who has these problems? We should finde a solution and
decision if we go for 1.6-rc.2 or not.
Cheers
Andy
On 25 February 2014 15:04, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Wait a moment. I have the numbers!
>
> Will update issue ticket in few hours.
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Bumping this. It would be good to get this release out. I don't think
> > FreeBSD 10 support is a blocker. We can address it in a bugfix
> > version. We've waited long enough to get 1.6 out I think.
> >
> > On 17 February 2014 11:57, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> >>> afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the
> support
> >>> with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
> >>> should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
> >>> March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
> >>
> >> I'm whole on this, but actually out of any ideas why so dramatically
> >> slow and mediating on funcs calls timing for the inspiration.
> >>
> >> --
> >> ,,,^..^,,,
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Noah Slater
> > https://twitter.com/nslater
>
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
Wait a moment. I have the numbers!
Will update issue ticket in few hours.
--
,,,^..^,,,
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org> wrote:
> Bumping this. It would be good to get this release out. I don't think
> FreeBSD 10 support is a blocker. We can address it in a bugfix
> version. We've waited long enough to get 1.6 out I think.
>
> On 17 February 2014 11:57, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
>>> afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the support
>>> with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
>>> should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
>>> March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
>>
>> I'm whole on this, but actually out of any ideas why so dramatically
>> slow and mediating on funcs calls timing for the inspiration.
>>
>> --
>> ,,,^..^,,,
>
>
>
> --
> Noah Slater
> https://twitter.com/nslater
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Bumping this. It would be good to get this release out. I don't think
FreeBSD 10 support is a blocker. We can address it in a bugfix
version. We've waited long enough to get 1.6 out I think.
On 17 February 2014 11:57, Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
>> afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the support
>> with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
>> should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
>> March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
>
> I'm whole on this, but actually out of any ideas why so dramatically
> slow and mediating on funcs calls timing for the inspiration.
>
> --
> ,,,^..^,,,
--
Noah Slater
https://twitter.com/nslater
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Alexander Shorin <kx...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de> wrote:
> afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the support
> with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
> should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
> March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
I'm whole on this, but actually out of any ideas why so dramatically
slow and mediating on funcs calls timing for the inspiration.
--
,,,^..^,,,
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Andy Wenk <an...@nms.de>.
On 17 February 2014 11:25, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>
> wrote:
> >> However I don't think we have a successful `make distcheck` on FreeBSD
> >> 10 yet
> >
> > This sounds like reason to hold off, if someone steps up to fix it? If
> > not, I should probably just go ahead.
>
> Any comments on this? Can anyone with access to FreeBSD step up? Do we
> want to not support FreeBSD 10 on our 1.6 release? We need some
> movement here.
>
afaik we supported FreeBSD 10 with earlier versions. Droppping the support
with 1.6 (even when it would just be for a short time) is not what we
should do. As Dave stated, he will not be able to work on a fix until
March. But maybe Alex can find time to do some work.
I am -1 of dropping the BSD support but +1 to first fix it.
Cheers
Andy
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg - Germany
RockIt!
http://www.couchdb-buch.de
http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC 9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
>> However I don't think we have a successful `make distcheck` on FreeBSD
>> 10 yet
>
> This sounds like reason to hold off, if someone steps up to fix it? If
> not, I should probably just go ahead.
Any comments on this? Can anyone with access to FreeBSD step up? Do we
want to not support FreeBSD 10 on our 1.6 release? We need some
movement here.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com> wrote:
> However I don't think we have a successful `make distcheck` on FreeBSD
> 10 yet
This sounds like reason to hold off, if someone steps up to fix it? If
not, I should probably just go ahead.
Cheers,
Dirkjan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <dc...@jsonified.com>.
On 11 February 2014 12:17, Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Imo we can't know if COUCHDB-1986 is really fixed for now due to the
>> comment, the fact that all tests pass using the combination of the 2
>> commits (bit not with one or the other alone) is mysterious. However
>> they are fixing real issues so i would release now with them instead
>> of waiting more.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> SGTM.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
Hi Dirkjan, all,
Go for it.
I don't think we should be delaying a release unless:
- we have a clear regression that is not addressed
- we can't build on a supported platform
- we've got an accepted blocking ticket open
i.e. shipping improved software regularly is to me more important than
having all open JIRA tickets addressed[1].
However I don't think we have a successful `make distcheck` on FreeBSD
10 yet, & unfortunately I've not got time before mid March (!) to do
further work on FreeBSD 10 issues - you'll notice I'm even hiding from
IRC! There are a number of other recent & potential fixes in ibrowse,
which is not yet tagged v4.0.3 they may also be of use. BTW Alex has
access to the box and I'm happy to provide that to any community
member who wishes to help out.
[1]: http://www.hyrumwright.org/papers/floss2009.pdf BTW this paper
from the svn team in 2009 is worth a read
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 1.6.0-rc.1
Posted by Dirkjan Ochtman <di...@ochtman.nl>.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Imo we can't know if COUCHDB-1986 is really fixed for now due to the
> comment, the fact that all tests pass using the combination of the 2
> commits (bit not with one or the other alone) is mysterious. However
> they are fixing real issues so i would release now with them instead
> of waiting more.
>
> Thoughts?
SGTM.
Cheers,
Dirkjan