You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Siyuan Liu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/02/02 17:49:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-2679) Group by without aggregation function cannot be translated to correct JSON in Elasticsearch Adapter

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16759133#comment-16759133 ] 

Siyuan Liu commented on CALCITE-2679:
-------------------------------------

Fixed in PR: [https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1025|https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1025,]

> Group by without aggregation function cannot be translated to correct JSON in Elasticsearch Adapter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2679
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2679
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: elasticsearch-adapter
>    Affects Versions: 1.18.0
>            Reporter: Siyuan Liu
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: easyfix
>             Fix For: 1.18.0
>
>
> The Elasticsearch Adapter of the current master branch has some problems when querying for group by clause without aggregation function. For example, when I query the following SQL:
> {code:sql}
> select state, city from zips group by state, city
> {code}
> After translation, adapter should return the following JSON:
> {code:json}
> {
> 	"_source": false,
> 	"size": 0,
> 	"aggregations": {
> 		"g_state": {
> 			"terms": {
> 				"field": "state",
> 				"missing": "__MISSING__"
> 			},
> 			"aggregations": {
> 				"g_city ": {
> 				  "terms ": {
> 					"field ":"city ",
> 					  "missing":"__MISSING__ "
> 				  }
> 				}
> 			}
> 		}
> 	}
> }
> {code}
> But it returns the following JSON now:
> {code:sql}
> {
> 	"_source": ["state", "city"]
> }
> {code}
> The reason for this problem is that there is a missing condition for judging the aggregation query. 
> In addition, there is the other associated problem. After building aggregation JSON, the code of current version will remove empty aggregation block in ElasticsearchTable class, the code just like this:
>   {code:java}
> JsonNode agg = query;
> while (agg.has(AGGREGATIONS) && agg.get(AGGREGATIONS).elements().hasNext()) {
>   agg = agg.get(AGGREGATIONS);
> }
> ((ObjectNode) agg).remove(AGGREGATIONS);
> {code}
> But if input the JSON like above, this code will not work out.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)