You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com> on 2006/02/17 10:27:00 UTC
[classlib] security moved
I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as needed.
I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
Tim, do the change of the package names if you wish. I'll do the
snapshot based on a svn rev later today (unless someone else wants
to...) I suspect that it won't be a major deal if you get the new J9 VM
up at the same time as the svn change is made...
Of to sleep for a few...
geir
Re: [classlib] security moved
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Really.. It's a snapshot. Please. That way you can get the refactoring
in and new VM up.... T
The PMC had been advised that we are doing shapshots...
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>>> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
>>>>> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as
>>>>> needed.
>>>> Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
>>>> tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
>>> Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't
>>> feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a
>>> policy to expire it out of there at some point.
>>
>> whatever -- I don't really mind either. We have a module called
>> 'archive' so don't want to add to confusion about the archive in trunk.
>>
>>>>> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really
>>>>> awful
>>>>> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
>>>>> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time
>>>>> I've had
>>>>> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
>>>> I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the
>>>> snapshot
>>>> archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
>>>> green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
>>> No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this.
>>
>> ok -- let me know, I'll wait.
>>
>
> Don't hold up for this. This is for all practical purposes an
> automated snapshot, you being the automator... No one will confuse this
> for a release of any sort.
>
> We prollie should be doubly sure, and put a note in the root -
> SNAPSHOT.txt or something for next time...
>
>>> BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet?
>>
>> erm, (shuffle, shuffle), no. I run the default target and copy in the
>> license, notices, and readme files. I'll add it to the list
>
> Cool - I just was getting bleary-eyed last night so wasn't sure if I
> missed it..
>
> thx
>
> geir
>
>
Re: [classlib] security moved
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> Tim Ellison wrote:
>>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>>> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
>>>> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as
>>>> needed.
>>> Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
>>> tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
>> Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't
>> feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a
>> policy to expire it out of there at some point.
>
> whatever -- I don't really mind either. We have a module called
> 'archive' so don't want to add to confusion about the archive in trunk.
>
>>>> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
>>>> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
>>>> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
>>>> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
>>> I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot
>>> archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
>>> green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
>> No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this.
>
> ok -- let me know, I'll wait.
>
Don't hold up for this. This is for all practical purposes an
automated snapshot, you being the automator... No one will confuse this
for a release of any sort.
We prollie should be doubly sure, and put a note in the root -
SNAPSHOT.txt or something for next time...
>> BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet?
>
> erm, (shuffle, shuffle), no. I run the default target and copy in the
> license, notices, and readme files. I'll add it to the list
Cool - I just was getting bleary-eyed last night so wasn't sure if I
missed it..
thx
geir
Re: [classlib] security moved
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote:
>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>>> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
>>> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as
>>> needed.
>>
>> Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
>> tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
>
> Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't
> feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a
> policy to expire it out of there at some point.
whatever -- I don't really mind either. We have a module called
'archive' so don't want to add to confusion about the archive in trunk.
>>> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
>>> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
>>> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
>>> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
>>
>> I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot
>> archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
>> green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
>
> No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this.
ok -- let me know, I'll wait.
> BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet?
erm, (shuffle, shuffle), no. I run the default target and copy in the
license, notices, and readme files. I'll add it to the list.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
Re: [classlib] security moved
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@pobox.com>.
Tim Ellison wrote:
> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
>> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as needed.
>
> Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
> tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
Hm. I think of it still as "live material" in our tree, but I don't
feel too strongly about this. If we keep it there, we should set a
policy to expire it out of there at some point.
>
>> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
>> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
>> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
>> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
>
> I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot
> archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
> green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
No. I'll check to see if I promised lazy notification messages on this.
BTW, is there an ant target for this snapshot creation yet?
>
>> Tim, do the change of the package names if you wish. I'll do the
>> snapshot based on a svn rev later today (unless someone else wants
>> to...) I suspect that it won't be a major deal if you get the new J9 VM
>> up at the same time as the svn change is made...
>
> The plan is still on course to have the new VME version in place ready
> for people to continue working seamlessly, and leave the old VME there
> to run snapshots.
Right -
Re: [classlib] security moved
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
> I moved modules/security to archive/modules/security and moved
> modules/security2 to modules/security. I adjusted build scripts as needed.
Thanks. How about making the archive/ a peer of trunk/, branches/ &
tags/, then people downloading trunk won't get the archived stuff too?
> I wasn't able to go further or put a snapshot up because of really awful
> network conditions in the hotel I'm in. (There seems to be something
> systemically bad about Embassy Suites - this is the second time I've had
> network problems in the last two times I stayed in one...)
I have built the refactored code (at rev 378478) and created the snapshot
archives. They are sitting on my disk at the moment. Do we need a
green light from the incubator PMC before uploading a new snapshot?
> Tim, do the change of the package names if you wish. I'll do the
> snapshot based on a svn rev later today (unless someone else wants
> to...) I suspect that it won't be a major deal if you get the new J9 VM
> up at the same time as the svn change is made...
The plan is still on course to have the new VME version in place ready
for people to continue working seamlessly, and leave the old VME there
to run snapshots.
Regards,
Tim
--
Tim Ellison (t.p.ellison@gmail.com)
IBM Java technology centre, UK.