You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/06/15 11:41:37 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk opened a new issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

potiuk opened a new issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456


   I have a kind request for all the contributors to the latest provider packages release.
   Could you help us to test the RC versions of the providers and let us know in the comment,
   if the issue is addressed there.
   
   ## Providers that need testing
   
   Those are providers that require testing as there were some substantial changes introduced:
   
   
   ### Provider [airbyte: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-airbyte/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Add test_connection method to Airbyte hook (#16236)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16236): @msumit
      - [ ] [Fix hooks extended from http hook (#16109)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16109): @msumit
   ### Provider [amazon: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-amazon/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [read timestamp from Cloudwatch events (#15173)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15173): @codenamestif
      - [ ] [remove retry for now (#16150)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16150): @zachliu
      - [ ] [Remove the `not-allow-trailing-slash` rule on S3_hook (#15609)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15609): @Isaacwhyuenac
      - [ ] [Add support of capacity provider strategy for ECSOperator (#15848)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15848): @codenamestif
      - [ ] [Update copy command for s3 to redshift (#16241)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16241): @sunki-hong
      - [ ] [Fix S3 Select payload join (#16189)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16189): @TAKEDA-Takashi
      - [ ] [Fix spacing in AwsBatchWaitersHook docstring (#15839)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15839): @jlaneve
      - [ ] [MongoToS3Operator failed when running with a single query (not aggregate pipeline) (#15680)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15680): @amatellanes
      - [ ] [fix: AwsGlueJobOperator change order of args for load_file (#16216)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16216): @avocadomaster
   ### Provider [apache.spark: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-spark/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Make SparkSqlHook use Connection (#15794)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15794): @uranusjr
   ### Provider [cncf.kubernetes: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cncf-kubernetes/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Add KPO pod-template-file jinja template support. (#15942)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15942): @Dr-Denzy
      - [ ] [Save pod name to xcom for KubernetesPodOperator (#15755)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15755): @Junnplus
      - [ ] [Bug Fix Pod-Template Affinity Ignored due to empty Affinity K8S Object (#15787)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15787): @jpyen
      - [ ] [Bug Pod Template File Values Ignored (#16095)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16095): @jpyen
      - [ ] [Fix issue with parsing error logs in the KPO (#15638)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15638): @dimberman
   ### Provider [dingding: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-dingding/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fix hooks extended from http hook (#16109)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16109): @msumit
   ### Provider [discord: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-discord/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fix hooks extended from http hook (#16109)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16109): @msumit
   ### Provider [docker: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-docker/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Replace DockerOperator&#39;s &#39;volumes&#39; arg for &#39;mounts&#39; (#15843)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15843): @uranusjr
   ### Provider [elasticsearch: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Support remote logging in elasticsearch with filebeat 7 (#14625)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14625): @jedcunningham
   ### Provider [google: 4.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-google/4.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Move plyvel to google provider extra (#15812)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15812): @dstandish
      - [ ] [Fixes AzureFileShare connection extras (#16388)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16388): @potiuk
      - [ ] [Add extra links for google dataproc (#10343)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/10343): @yesemsanthoshkumar
      - [ ] [Add link to Oracle Connection Docs (#15632)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15632): @sunkickr
      - [ ] [pass wait_for_done parameter down to _DataflowJobsController (#15541)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15541): @dejii
      - [ ] [Update Google Ads hook (#15266)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15266): @jacobhjkim
      - [ ] [Implement BigQuery Table Schema Update Operator (#15367)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15367): @thejens
      - [ ] [Add BigQueryToMsSqlOperator (#15422)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15422): @subkanthi
      - [ ] [Fix: GCS To BigQuery source_object (#16160)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16160): @tegardp
      - [ ] [FIX: unnecessary downloads in GCSToLocalFilesystemOperator (#16171)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16171): @p-kachalov
      - [ ] [Fix bigquery type error when export format is parquet (#16027)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16027): @sunki-hong
      - [ ] [Fix argument ordering and type of bucket and object (#15738)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15738): @sjvanrossum
      - [ ] [Fix sql_to_gcs docstring lint error (#15730)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15730): @natanweinberger
      - [ ] [Ensure `mysql_to_gcs` fully compatible with MySQL and BigQuery for `datetime`-related values  (#15026)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026): @tianjianjiang
      - [ ] [Fix deprecation warnings location in google provider (#16403)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16403): @ashb
   ### Provider [hashicorp: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-hashicorp/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Sanitize end of line character when loading token from a file (vault) (#16407)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16407): @mmenarguezpear
   ### Provider [http: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-http/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Update SimpleHttpOperator to take auth type object (#15605)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15605): @fredthomsen
      - [ ] [HttpHook. Use request factory and respect defaults (#14701)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14701): @ngaranko
   ### Provider [microsoft.azure: 3.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/3.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fixes AzureFileShare connection extras (#16388)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16388): @potiuk
      - [ ] [Add link to Oracle Connection Docs (#15632)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15632): @sunkickr
      - [ ] [Fix WasbHook.delete_file broken when using prefix (#15637)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15637): @monti-python
      - [ ] [Fix colon spacing in AzureDataExplorerHook docstring (#15841)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15841): @jlaneve
      - [ ] [fix wasb remote logging when blob already exists (#16280)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16280): @flolas
   ### Provider [odbc: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-odbc/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [OdbcHook returns None. Related to #15016 issue. (#15510)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15510): @Goodkat
      - [ ] [Fix OdbcHook handling of port (#15772)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15772): @dstandish
   ### Provider [opsgenie: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-opsgenie/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fix hooks extended from http hook (#16109)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16109): @msumit
   ### Provider [oracle: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-oracle/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Add optional result handler to database hooks (#15581)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15581): @malthe
      - [ ] [[Oracle] Add port to DSN (#15589)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15589): @malthe
      - [ ] [Add link to Oracle Connection Docs (#15632)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15632): @sunkickr
   ### Provider [papermill: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-papermill/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Emit error on duplicated DAG ID (#15302)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15302): @uranusjr
   ### Provider [plexus: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-plexus/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Removes arrow higher limits for plexus provider (#16026)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16026): @potiuk
   ### Provider [postgres: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-postgres/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [PostgresHook: deepcopy connection to avoid mutating connection obj (#15412)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15412): @zhzhang
      - [ ] [Avoid passing `aws_conn_id` as conn_args for `psycopg2.connect` (#16100)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16100): @gabrielsyapse
   ### Provider [qubole: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-qubole/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Qubole Hook Does Not Support &#39;include_headers&#39; (#15598)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15598): @levyitay
      - [ ] [Feature qubole hook support headers (#15683)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15683): @levyitay
      - [ ] [Feature qubole hook support headers (#15615)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15615): @levyitay
   ### Provider [samba: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-samba/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Add support for extra parameters to samba client (#16115)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16115): @malthe
   ### Provider [sftp: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Depreciate private_key_pass extra param and rename to private_key_passphrase (#14028)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/14028): @pgillet
   ### Provider [slack: 4.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-slack/4.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fix hooks extended from http hook (#16109)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16109): @msumit
   ### Provider [snowflake: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-snowflake/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Add `template_fields` to `S3ToSnowflake` operator (#15926)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15926): @nlecoy
      - [ ] [Allow S3ToSnowflakeOperator to omit schema (#15817)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15817): @uranusjr
      - [ ] [Added ability for Snowflake to attribute usage to Airflow by adding an application parameter (#16420)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16420): @sfc-gh-madkins
      - [ ] [fix: restore parameters support when sql passed to SnowflakeHook as str (#16102)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16102): @grassten
   ### Provider [ssh: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ssh/2.0.0rc1)
      - [ ] [Fixed #9963: Display explicit error in case UID has no actual username (#15212)](https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15212): @andrewgodwin
   
   ## Providers that do not need testing
   
   Those are providers that were either doc-only or had changes that do not require testing.
   
   
   * Provider [apache.beam: 3.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/3.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.cassandra: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-cassandra/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.druid: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-druid/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.hdfs: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hdfs/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.hive: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-hive/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.kylin: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-kylin/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.livy: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-livy/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.pig: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-pig/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.pinot: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-pinot/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [apache.sqoop: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-apache-sqoop/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [asana: 1.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/1.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [celery: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-celery/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [cloudant: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-cloudant/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [databricks: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-databricks/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [datadog: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-datadog/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [exasol: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-exasol/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [facebook: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-facebook/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [ftp: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-ftp/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [grpc: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-grpc/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [imap: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-imap/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [jdbc: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jdbc/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [jenkins: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jenkins/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [jira: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-jira/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [microsoft.mssql: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-mssql/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [microsoft.winrm: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-winrm/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [mongo: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mongo/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [mysql: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-mysql/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [neo4j: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-neo4j/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [openfaas: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-openfaas/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [pagerduty: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-pagerduty/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [presto: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-presto/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [redis: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-redis/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [salesforce: 3.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-salesforce/3.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [segment: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-segment/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [sendgrid: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sendgrid/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [singularity: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-singularity/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [sqlite: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-sqlite/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [tableau: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-tableau/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [telegram: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-telegram/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [trino: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-trino/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [vertica: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-vertica/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [yandex: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/2.0.0rc1)
   * Provider [zendesk: 2.0.0rc1](https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-zendesk/2.0.0rc1)
   
   <!--
   
   NOTE TO RELEASE MANAGER:
   
   Please move here the providers that have doc-only changes or for which changes are trivial and
   you could asses that they are OK. In case
   
   The providers are automatically installed on Airflow 2.1 and latest `main` during the CI, so we know they
   are installable. Also all classes within the providers are imported during the CI run so we know all
   providers can be imported.
   
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] jmelot commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jmelot commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-861895912


   Tested Asana provider, all seems to be well!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] codenamestif commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
codenamestif commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-862109461


   The package description says that the provider can be installed on top of existing airflow 2.*. I'm installing amazon provider and it requires airflow 2.1. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] Isaacwhyuenac commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Isaacwhyuenac commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864765754


   Tested #15609. It works fine


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] Goodkat commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Goodkat commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-861882757


   Tested odbc connection, it works as expected with boolean parameters now:
   https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15016#issuecomment-826650629


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865252500


   > Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions.
   
   Thanks @jedcunningham ! corrected the link to keep good track of it.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] tianjianjiang edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tianjianjiang edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865497026


   @potiuk I've tried to allocate some resource for testing #15026 but unfortunately not happening soon enough. However, at least the situation I've experienced before is coded in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026/files#diff-ba677556962f02c90a0e6933525d9d3f795e2d44a3d2229de1db9d1b68a067eb and since the datetime-related change is abstract while its upstream has only one change set of docstring lint (#15730), it is highly likely #15026 will work.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] dejii commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
dejii commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864649402


   Tested #15541. Works as expected.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865201487


   > However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time (also for minor changes) and aren't listed here, should they be included?
   
   Auto-apply is specifically excluded as it was a change that applied to all providers (and main reason for this backwards-incompatible release) but it has been tested before. The other one is a docstring only (and those are excluded from changelog/testing). 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] nlecoy commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
nlecoy commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-862093783


   I've been using the fix of #15926 for work and everything looks fine! Also, I tested #15817 and its working too.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] tianjianjiang commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tianjianjiang commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865497026


   @potiuk I've tried to allocate some resource for testing #15026 but unfortunately not happening soon enough. However, at least the situation I've experienced before is coded in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026/files#diff-ba677556962f02c90a0e6933525d9d3f795e2d44a3d2229de1db9d1b68a067eb and since the datetime-related change is abstract and its upstreams has one one change set of docstring lint (#15730), it is highly likely #15026 will work.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] olivermeyer commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
olivermeyer commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865065333


   #16327 works as expected.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] JavierLopezT edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
JavierLopezT edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866273510


   Hello. Regarding https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test due to health reasons. I am sorry


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864764509


   Hey everyone. Just a kind ping here. 
   
   Due to update in READMEs, the voting on the packages have been prolonged to Tuesday so we have two more days for testing.
   
   Thanks to @dejii @TAKEDA-Takashi @flolas @levyitay @codenamestif @amatellanes @nlecoy @jmelot @Goodkat @zhzhang for testing their changes (you rock!). 
   
   It would be great if we hear from others as well before the PMC gets to vote :). @MatthewRBruce @JavierLopezT @mmenarguezpear @monti-python @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @olivermeyer @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov 
   @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum  @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar @natanweinberger  @jedcunningham @Visya  @andrewgodwin 
   @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @tianjianjiang @dstandish @Isaacwhyuenac @sfc-gh-madkins @ngaranko @ashb  @tegardp


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] JavierLopezT commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
JavierLopezT commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866273510


   Hello. Regarding https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test for health reasons. I am sorry


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] jedcunningham commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jedcunningham commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865247949


   Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-861434330


   This would be great it we could have confirmation for most of the providers by Friday afternoon, so that I could release them then :)  


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] monti-python commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
monti-python commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865094231


   #15637 works as expected as well


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] monti-python commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
monti-python commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865094231


   #15637 works as expected as well


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] fredthomsen commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
fredthomsen commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864090266


   Tested `SimpleHttpOperator` for #15605.  All good.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864002788






-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] Isaacwhyuenac commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
Isaacwhyuenac commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864765754


   Tested #15609. It works fine


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866250330


   Kind ping again. Last chance to do some testing before we release.
   
   @JavierLopezT @mmenarguezpear @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar  @Visya @andrewgodwin @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @dstandish @sfc-gh-madkins @ngaranko @ashb @tegardp


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] natanweinberger commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
natanweinberger commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865182424


   #15730 is just a whitespace linting fix, can be considered checked!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] tianjianjiang commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tianjianjiang commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865497026


   @potiuk I've tried to allocate some resource for testing #15026 but unfortunately not happening soon enough. However, at least the situation I've experienced before is coded in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026/files#diff-ba677556962f02c90a0e6933525d9d3f795e2d44a3d2229de1db9d1b68a067eb and since the datetime-related change is abstract and its upstreams has one one change set of docstring lint (#15730), it is highly likely #15026 will work.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] ngaranko commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
ngaranko commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866318647


   #14701 works as expected.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk closed issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk closed issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865182424


   #15730 is just a whitespace linting fix 👍
   
   However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time and aren't listed here, should they be included?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] jedcunningham commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
jedcunningham commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865247949


   Tested elasticsearch 2.0.1rc1 (note: rc1, not 2 as linked in the description), looks good. Do note that some of the fixes/features only work with core changes coming in 2.1.1, but the new provider does still work with earlier 2.x versions.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] tianjianjiang edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
tianjianjiang edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865497026


   @potiuk I've tried to allocate some resource for testing #15026 but unfortunately not happening soon enough. However, at least the situation I've experienced before is coded in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15026/files#diff-ba677556962f02c90a0e6933525d9d3f795e2d44a3d2229de1db9d1b68a067eb and since the datetime-related change is abstract while its upstream has only one change set of docstring lint (#15730), it is highly likely #15026 will work.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864764509






-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866362942


   > Hello. Regarding #13796, I did make a quick test before merging the PR (the file was there and was not empty) but I can't make a deeper test due to health reasons. I am sorry
   
   No worries! thanks for your contributions so far @JavierLopezT !


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] zhzhang commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
zhzhang commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-861847160


   Tested postgres connection changes on a Resdhift cluster, looks good to me.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] natanweinberger commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
natanweinberger commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865182424


   #15730 is just a whitespace linting fix, can be considered checked!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-862135524


   > The package description says that the provider can be installed on top of existing airflow 2.*. I'm installing amazon provider and it requires airflow 2.1.
   
   Yep. We have an enty in changelog about it with warning. Do you think it's not enough ?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865182424






-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-866700502


   Callng for last vote so last chance to test before we release.
   @mmenarguezpear @Junnplus @codenamestif @gabrielsyapse @uranusjr @Dr-Denzy @jpyen @jacobhjkim @zachliu @thejens @p-kachalov @sunki-hong @sjvanrossum @subkanthi @avocadomaster @jlaneve @sunkickr @malthe @yesemsanthoshkumar @Visya @andrewgodwin @dimberman @msumit @grassten @pgillet @dstandish @sfc-gh-madkins @ashb @tegardp


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] MatthewRBruce commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
MatthewRBruce commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865058607


   Tested #15490 - Fix unsuccessful KubernetesPod final_state call when is_delete_operator_pod=True.  Works as expected.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 15, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-861437693


   @jmelot Also a kind request for you - it's the first release of Asana provider, so if you could test it as well and let us know in the comment, it would be great: https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-asana/1.0.0rc1


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] TAKEDA-Takashi commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
TAKEDA-Takashi commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-864640776


   Tested #16189. Works fine.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] MatthewRBruce commented on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
MatthewRBruce commented on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865058607


   Tested #15490 - Fix unsuccessful KubernetesPod final_state call when is_delete_operator_pod=True.  Works as expected.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [airflow] natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456: Status of testing Providers that were prepared on June 18, 2021

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
natanweinberger edited a comment on issue #16456:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16456#issuecomment-865182424


   #15730 is just a whitespace linting fix 👍
   
   However, #15728 and #15667 touched the same file around the same time (also for minor changes) and aren't listed here, should they be included?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org