You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com> on 2009/05/12 03:31:56 UTC
Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".
The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
<http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/>While
the latest binary here
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
indicates
the latest build should be 12-May-2009
Is there any problem with the build system ?
--
Shawn
enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests failure (Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Been looking into this one and it appears that my first guess wasn't
right. Seems to actually be some issue with the ejb linking code.
For some reason the app client is trying to lookup a local view from
the server.
Investigating.
-David
On May 11, 2009, at 11:00 PM, David Blevins wrote:
> Hmmm. I seem to recall mid April being the time that we realized we
> weren't getting updated openejb snapshots due to the nexus switch.
> I suspect it might some left over "must updated the clients to use
> the right JNDI name" due to the fix that Manu made a few months back
> that made it so the jndi name elements in the openejb-jar.xml worked
> again.
>
>
> -David
>
>
> On May 11, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
>> Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.
>>
>> You can browse the results at:
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
>> (under logs-<testtime>-<container> directories).
>>
>> For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt
>>
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com
>> > wrote:
>>> I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15
>>> april, thus
>>> preventing copying to the "latest" location.
>>> Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on
>>> my mac,
>>> but I haven't looked very hard into why. Can anyone supply info
>>> on the test
>>> failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
>>> thanks
>>> david jencks
>>> On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>>
>>> The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
>>> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
>>>
>>> While the latest binary
>>> here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
>>> indicates
>>> the latest build should be 12-May-2009
>>> Is there any problem with the build system ?
>>> --
>>> Shawn
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Hmmm. I seem to recall mid April being the time that we realized we
weren't getting updated openejb snapshots due to the nexus switch. I
suspect it might some left over "must updated the clients to use the
right JNDI name" due to the fix that Manu made a few months back that
made it so the jndi name elements in the openejb-jar.xml worked again.
-David
On May 11, 2009, at 7:31 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.
>
> You can browse the results at:
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
> (under logs-<testtime>-<container> directories).
>
> For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt
>
> Jarek
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks
> <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15
>> april, thus
>> preventing copying to the "latest" location.
>> Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on
>> my mac,
>> but I haven't looked very hard into why. Can anyone supply info on
>> the test
>> failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
>> thanks
>> david jencks
>> On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>
>> The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/
>> latest/
>>
>> While the latest binary
>> here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
>> indicates
>> the latest build should be 12-May-2009
>> Is there any problem with the build system ?
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>>
>
Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
Yep. The 'latest' link is updated when all testsuite test pass.
You can browse the results at:
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
(under logs-<testtime>-<container> directories).
For example for enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests see
http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/logs-2100-tomcat/enterprise-testsuite/sec-tests/sec-ear/target/surefire-reports/org.apache.geronimo.mavenplugins.geronimo.server.RunClientMojo.txt
Jarek
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:07 PM, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april, thus
> preventing copying to the "latest" location.
> Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my mac,
> but I haven't looked very hard into why. Can anyone supply info on the test
> failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
> thanks
> david jencks
> On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>
> The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to
> http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
>
> While the latest binary
> here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/ indicates
> the latest build should be 12-May-2009
> Is there any problem with the build system ?
> --
> Shawn
>
>
Re: Latest trunk builds are not the "latest".
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
I strongly suspect that the testsuite has been failing since 15 april,
thus preventing copying to the "latest" location.
Personally I get more and different testsuite failures locally on my
mac, but I haven't looked very hard into why. Can anyone supply info
on the test failure that is occurring in the automated builds?
thanks
david jencks
On May 11, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
> The trunk binary here was built on 15-Apr-2009 according to http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/latest/
>
>
> While the latest binary here http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20090511/
> indicates the latest build should be 12-May-2009
>
> Is there any problem with the build system ?
> --
> Shawn