You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@sentry.apache.org by "Hao Hao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/03/11 08:18:40 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SENTRY-1066) Sentry oracle upgrade script failed with ORA-0955 duplicate name issue

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1066?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hao Hao updated SENTRY-1066:
----------------------------
    Fix Version/s: 1.7.0

> Sentry oracle upgrade script failed with ORA-0955 duplicate name issue
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SENTRY-1066
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SENTRY-1066
>             Project: Sentry
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.1, 1.7.0
>            Reporter: Anne Yu
>            Assignee: Anne Yu
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>         Attachments: SENTRY-1066.0.patch, SENTRY-1066.1.patch
>
>
> We've seen ORA-0955 duplicate name issue while running Sentry upgrade scripts.
> Running Oracle 11g. We eventually tracked it to /opt/cloudera/parcels/CDH/lib/sentry/scripts/sentrystore/upgrade/004-SENTRY-74.oracle.sql:
> {code:sql}
> ALTER TABLE SENTRY_DB_PRIVILEGE DROP CONSTRAINT "SENTRY_DB_PRIV_PRIV_NAME_UNIQ";
> ALTER TABLE SENTRY_DB_PRIVILEGE ADD CONSTRAINT "SENTRY_DB_PRIV_PRIV_NAME_UNIQ" UNIQUE ("SERVER_NAME","DB_NAME","TABLE_NAME","COLUMN_NAME","URI","ACTION","WITH_GRANT_OPTION");
> {code}
> Although constraint was dropped, it fails to re-add, as there was an implicit index added with same name as well (expected behavior according to docs: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/clauses002.htm See: "Unique Constraints").
> Dropping the index allowed us to finish upgrading the schema successfully.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)