You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Darren Shepherd <da...@gmail.com> on 2013/09/25 21:37:53 UTC
LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
seems often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This
seems bad. I don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so
things like "Unable to create local folder for:
/mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem
is, shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup
it should never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting
flipped that is enabling that?
Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
secondary to the management server if the conditions are right...
Darren
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Not that I am aware of. It seems like there is a column name missing there.
Or that sql keyword default has been used as column name. I'll look into it.
regards,
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Dann, Thanks for filing the bug. But I have problem to import your sql
> dump to db:
>
> $mysql -u root cloud < Dump20130930.sql
> ERROR 1064 (42000) at line 97: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check
> the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right
> syntax to use near 'default tinyint NOT NULL,
> domain_id tinyint NOT NULL,
> domain_uuid tinyint NO' at line 10
>
> Any special command to use to restore your dump file?
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
>
>
> On 9/30/13 12:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >H Min I made a bug and attached the log. If you don't see it at the
> >spot don't worry. when prio gets high I'll look at it myself.
> >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759
> >
> >On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> -min
> >>
> >> On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it
> >>>was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm
> >>>as not running:
> >>>
> >>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
> >>>CIDR...
> >>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60
> >>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host
> >>>10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host
> >>>10.200.23.42 is already setup.
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>Received a host startup notification
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>Received a host startup notification
> >>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
> >>>CIDR...
> >>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60
> >>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host
> >>>10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host
> >>>10.200.23.41 is already setup.
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
> >>>Connection established between
> >>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2
> >>>host + 1
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>Received a host startup notification
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080
> >>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>Received a host startup notification
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
> >>>Connection established between
> >>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a
> >>>host + 2
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> >>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> >>>
> >>>is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk?
> >>>
> >>>regards,
> >>>Daan
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
> >
> >>>wrote:
> >>>> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
> >>>> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
> >>>> message while the ssvm was up.
> >>>>
> >>>> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
> >>>>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you
> >>>>>encountered
> >>>>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table
> >>>>>is
> >>>>>in
> >>>>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We
> >>>>>may
> >>>>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> -min
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
> >>>>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
> >>>>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
> >>>>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
> >>>>>>first thing stopping me usually.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>
> >>>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
> >>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
> >>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >>>>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
> >>>>>>>>seems
> >>>>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This
> >>>>>>>>seems
> >>>>>>>>bad. I
> >>>>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like
> >>>>>>>>"Unable
> >>>>>>>>to
> >>>>>>>> create local folder for:
> >>>>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to
> >>>>>>>>mount
> >>>>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger
> >>>>>>>>problem
> >>>>>>>>is,
> >>>>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup
> >>>>>>>>it
> >>>>>>>>should
> >>>>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting
> >>>>>>>>flipped
> >>>>>>>>that is
> >>>>>>>> enabling that?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
> >>>>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to
> >>>>>>>download
> >>>>>>>template.
> >>>>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm
> >>>>>>>template.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
> >>>>>>>>secondary to
> >>>>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Darren
> >>>>>
> >>
>
>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>.
Dann, Thanks for filing the bug. But I have problem to import your sql
dump to db:
$mysql -u root cloud < Dump20130930.sql
ERROR 1064 (42000) at line 97: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check
the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right
syntax to use near 'default tinyint NOT NULL,
domain_id tinyint NOT NULL,
domain_uuid tinyint NO' at line 10
Any special command to use to restore your dump file?
Thanks
-min
On 9/30/13 12:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>H Min I made a bug and attached the log. If you don't see it at the
>spot don't worry. when prio gets high I'll look at it myself.
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759
>
>On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it?
>>
>> Thanks
>> -min
>>
>> On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it
>>>was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm
>>>as not running:
>>>
>>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>>>CIDR...
>>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60
>>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host
>>>10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host
>>>10.200.23.42 is already setup.
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>Received a host startup notification
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>Received a host startup notification
>>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>>>CIDR...
>>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60
>>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host
>>>10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host
>>>10.200.23.41 is already setup.
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>>Connection established between
>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2
>>>host + 1
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>Received a host startup notification
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080
>>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>Received a host startup notification
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>>Connection established between
>>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a
>>>host + 2
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>>
>>>is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk?
>>>
>>>regards,
>>>Daan
>>>
>>>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
>>>> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
>>>> message while the ssvm was up.
>>>>
>>>> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
>>>>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you
>>>>>encountered
>>>>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table
>>>>>is
>>>>>in
>>>>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We
>>>>>may
>>>>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> -min
>>>>>
>>>>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>>>>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>>>>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>>>>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>>>>>>first thing stopping me usually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>
>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>>>>>>seems
>>>>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This
>>>>>>>>seems
>>>>>>>>bad. I
>>>>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like
>>>>>>>>"Unable
>>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>>> create local folder for:
>>>>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to
>>>>>>>>mount
>>>>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger
>>>>>>>>problem
>>>>>>>>is,
>>>>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup
>>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting
>>>>>>>>flipped
>>>>>>>>that is
>>>>>>>> enabling that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>>>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to
>>>>>>>download
>>>>>>>template.
>>>>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm
>>>>>>>template.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>>>>>>secondary to
>>>>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Darren
>>>>>
>>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
H Min I made a bug and attached the log. If you don't see it at the
spot don't worry. when prio gets high I'll look at it myself.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4759
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it?
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it
>>was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm
>>as not running:
>>
>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>>CIDR...
>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60
>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host
>>10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host
>>10.200.23.42 is already setup.
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>Received a host startup notification
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>Received a host startup notification
>>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>>CIDR...
>>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60
>>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host
>>10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host
>>10.200.23.41 is already setup.
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>>Connection established between
>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2
>>host + 1
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>Received a host startup notification
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080
>>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>Received a host startup notification
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>>Connection established between
>>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a
>>host + 2
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>
>>is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk?
>>
>>regards,
>>Daan
>>
>>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
>>> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
>>> message while the ssvm was up.
>>>
>>> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
>>>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you
>>>>encountered
>>>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is
>>>>in
>>>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We
>>>>may
>>>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -min
>>>>
>>>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>>>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>>>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>>>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>>>>>first thing stopping me usually.
>>>>>
>>>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>>>>>seems
>>>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems
>>>>>>>bad. I
>>>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like
>>>>>>>"Unable
>>>>>>>to
>>>>>>> create local folder for:
>>>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to
>>>>>>>mount
>>>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger
>>>>>>>problem
>>>>>>>is,
>>>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup
>>>>>>>it
>>>>>>>should
>>>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped
>>>>>>>that is
>>>>>>> enabling that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download
>>>>>>template.
>>>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>>>>>secondary to
>>>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Darren
>>>>
>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Nguyen Anh Tu <ng...@gmail.com>.
2013/10/3 Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>
> Can you check ssvm log to see if it can connect back to MS? I ran into
> this today and found the reason that in global setting variable 'host' is
> set to 'localhost' instead of my laptop IP address, and thus when SSVM is
> up, it cannot connect back to MS to set the entry in Host table as Up.
> What is the output from sql select from your host table?
>
Hi Min,
Host table always show "connecting" state this morning, although SSVM can
connect to MS via port 8250. As I said, ssvm-healthcheck works fine without
any error. However, fortunately ssvm state changes to "Up" at afternoon
without any effort. I don't know what happens behind the scene. Now, I can
register template normally.
Anyone can explain about this?
Cheers,
--
N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>.
Can you check ssvm log to see if it can connect back to MS? I ran into
this today and found the reason that in global setting variable 'host' is
set to 'localhost' instead of my laptop IP address, and thus when SSVM is
up, it cannot connect back to MS to set the entry in Host table as Up.
What is the output from sql select from your host table?
Thanks
-min
On 10/2/13 6:38 PM, "Nguyen Anh Tu" <ng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>2013/9/27 Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>>
>
>I got the same issue with Daan. ssvm-healthcheck works fine but MS seemly
>don't recognize. SSVM state in Host table always Connecting. How about
>this
>error? Anyone can help?
>
>--
>
>N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Nguyen Anh Tu <ng...@gmail.com>.
2013/9/27 Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
> INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
> running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>
I got the same issue with Daan. ssvm-healthcheck works fine but MS seemly
don't recognize. SSVM state in Host table always Connecting. How about this
error? Anyone can help?
--
N.g.U.y.e.N.A.n.H.t.U
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>.
Can you file a bug and attach your db dump and ms log with it?
Thanks
-min
On 9/27/13 3:14 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it
>was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm
>as not running:
>
>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>CIDR...
>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60
>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host
>10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host
>10.200.23.42 is already setup.
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>Received a host startup notification
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>Received a host startup notification
>INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
>CIDR...
>INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60
>INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host
>10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host
>10.200.23.41 is already setup.
>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
>Connection established between
>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2
>host + 1
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>Received a host startup notification
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080
>INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>Received a host startup notification
>INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
>Connection established between
>org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a
>host + 2
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
>running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
>
>is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk?
>
>regards,
>Daan
>
>On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
>> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
>> message while the ssvm was up.
>>
>> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
>>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you
>>>encountered
>>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is
>>>in
>>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We
>>>may
>>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -min
>>>
>>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>>>>first thing stopping me usually.
>>>>
>>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>>>>seems
>>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems
>>>>>>bad. I
>>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like
>>>>>>"Unable
>>>>>>to
>>>>>> create local folder for:
>>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to
>>>>>>mount
>>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger
>>>>>>problem
>>>>>>is,
>>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup
>>>>>>it
>>>>>>should
>>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped
>>>>>>that is
>>>>>> enabling that?
>>>>>
>>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download
>>>>>template.
>>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>>>>secondary to
>>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Darren
>>>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
Min, I started the MS with the hosts and the ssvm running and while it
was registered as running in the db. It still keeps reporting the ssvm
as not running:
INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
Host: mccdxen2 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
CIDR...
INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
StartupAnswer received 1 Interval = 60
INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-2:null) Host
10.200.23.42 OpaqueRef:78780f36-0f5a-10d8-b037-2e9e26e1d29c: Host
10.200.23.42 is already setup.
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
Received a host startup notification
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2334
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
Received a host startup notification
INFO [c.c.h.x.d.XcpServerDiscoverer] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
Host: mccdxen1 connected with hypervisor type: XenServer. Checking
CIDR...
INFO [c.c.a.m.DirectAgentAttache] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
StartupAnswer received 2 Interval = 60
INFO [c.c.h.x.r.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-1:null) Host
10.200.23.41 OpaqueRef:04b11bd1-ff1b-d2e2-f0f7-c70d7f8dc58e: Host
10.200.23.41 is already setup.
INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-1:ctx-e0e62e7a)
Connection established between
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@6fd511e2
host + 1
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
Received a host startup notification
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
Scheduled network rules cleanup, interval=2080
INFO [c.c.n.s.SecurityGroupListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
Received a host startup notification
INFO [o.a.c.s.d.p.DefaultHostListener] (AgentTaskPool-2:ctx-a3209637)
Connection established between
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.datastore.PrimaryDataStoreImpl@479eb52a
host + 2
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
INFO [o.a.c.s.e.DefaultEndPointSelector] (StatsCollector-1:null) No
running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to LocalHostEndPoint
is this a bug or am i missing some architectural quirk?
regards,
Daan
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
> computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
> message while the ssvm was up.
>
> once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
>> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
>> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you encountered
>> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is in
>> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We may
>> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -min
>>
>> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>>>first thing stopping me usually.
>>>
>>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>>>
>>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>>>seems
>>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems
>>>>>bad. I
>>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable
>>>>>to
>>>>> create local folder for:
>>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
>>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem
>>>>>is,
>>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it
>>>>>should
>>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped
>>>>>that is
>>>>> enabling that?
>>>>
>>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download
>>>>template.
>>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>>>secondary to
>>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>>>
>>>>> Darren
>>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
The state is 'RUNNING' not 'Up' . Maybe it is me out racing the
computer. so don't deepdive. I just thought it was weird I got this
message while the ssvm was up.
once again, no hinder, Min. Thanks
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
> StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you encountered
> this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is in
> Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We may
> need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
>
> Thanks
> -min
>
> On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>>first thing stopping me usually.
>>
>>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>>
>>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>>seems
>>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems
>>>>bad. I
>>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable
>>>>to
>>>> create local folder for:
>>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
>>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem
>>>>is,
>>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it
>>>>should
>>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped
>>>>that is
>>>> enabling that?
>>>
>>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download
>>>template.
>>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>>secondary to
>>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>>
>>>> Darren
>
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Min Chen <mi...@citrix.com>.
I am only aware that before ssvm is up, you will see such message in
StatCollector, but that is no hurt. I don't understand why you encountered
this even if your ssvm is up? Is your s-1-VM entry in host db table is in
Up state? Are you using devcloud or real hypervisor in your setup? We may
need detailed log to figure out what is going on here in your case.
Thanks
-min
On 9/26/13 6:39 AM, "Daan Hoogland" <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
>LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
>s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
>relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
>first thing stopping me usually.
>
>On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>>
>>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it
>>>seems
>>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems
>>>bad. I
>>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable
>>>to
>>> create local folder for:
>>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
>>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem
>>>is,
>>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it
>>>should
>>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped
>>>that is
>>> enabling that?
>>
>> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then
>>template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download
>>template.
>> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>>
>>>
>>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount
>>>secondary to
>>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>>
>>> Darren
Re: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
I get "No running ssvm is found, so command will be sent to
LocalHostEndPoint" while I can see and log into a machine called
s-1-VM which has state 'RUNNING' in the database. Is there some
relation? I never though much of it as it does not seem to be the
first thing stopping me usually.
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:20 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>>
>> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it seems
>> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems bad. I
>> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable to
>> create local folder for:
>> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
>> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem is,
>> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it should
>> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped that is
>> enabling that?
>
> The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download template.
> Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>
>>
>> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount secondary to
>> the management server if the conditions are right...
>>
>> Darren
RE: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
Posted by Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Darren Shepherd [mailto:darren.s.shepherd@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2013 12:38 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: LocalHostEndPoint seems to get called
>
> While I'm doing development and restarting things and what not, it seems
> often storage commands get routed to LocalHostEndPoint. This seems bad. I
> don't have sudo setup for my user on my laptop, so things like "Unable to
> create local folder for:
> /mnt/secStorage/64d6e26f-e656-3ba3-908f-ce6610ede011 in order to mount
> nfs://192.168.3.134:/exports/secondary1" fail. But the bigger problem is,
> shouldn't that not happen at all. It seems like in a normal setup it should
> never try to use LocalHostEndpoint. Do I have some setting flipped that is
> enabling that?
The current code has bug if ssvm agent is not in the up state, then template downloading will likely choose localhostendpoint to download template.
Localhostendpoint should only be used to download system vm template.
>
> Seems like with the current code you might accidentally mount secondary to
> the management server if the conditions are right...
>
> Darren