You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4net-dev@logging.apache.org by Nicko Cadell <ni...@neoworks.com> on 2005/02/20 19:42:57 UTC
[POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
Hi all,
It has been rather a long time since the last beta release of log4net,
and an even long time since the last full release. I think it is time to
focus on finalising the 1.2 release and particularly that means focusing
on quality.
As I first step I think that we should produce an up to date snapshot
release from the current CVS head. The CVS code and documentation are in
good shape at the moment.
Would you approve such a release?
Assuming log4net 1.2.9 Beta is approved, I will petition the PMC and the
incubator for their (required) approvals.
Following this release I propose that we should freeze feature
development and concentrate on quality. Before the 1.2 final release
there will be one (or more, as required) release candidates.
Nicko
----
Nicko Cadell
log4net dev
Re: [POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
Posted by Niall Daley <ni...@apache.org>.
I agree.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005, Nicko Cadell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been rather a long time since the last beta release of log4net,
> and an even long time since the last full release. I think it is time to
> focus on finalising the 1.2 release and particularly that means focusing
> on quality.
>
> As I first step I think that we should produce an up to date snapshot
> release from the current CVS head. The CVS code and documentation are in
> good shape at the moment.
>
> Would you approve such a release?
>
> Assuming log4net 1.2.9 Beta is approved, I will petition the PMC and the
> incubator for their (required) approvals.
>
> Following this release I propose that we should freeze feature
> development and concentrate on quality. Before the 1.2 final release
> there will be one (or more, as required) release candidates.
>
> Nicko
>
> ----
> Nicko Cadell
> log4net dev
>
>
--
Niall Daley
Log4net Dev
RE: [POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
Posted by Henry Padilla <pa...@hotmail.com>.
That sounds good to me. I approve.
Tom Padilla
>From: "Nicko Cadell" <ni...@neoworks.com>
>Reply-To: "Log4NET Dev" <lo...@logging.apache.org>
>To: "Log4NET Dev" <lo...@logging.apache.org>
>Subject: [POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
>Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:42:57 -0000
>
>Hi all,
>
>It has been rather a long time since the last beta release of log4net,
>and an even long time since the last full release. I think it is time to
>focus on finalising the 1.2 release and particularly that means focusing
>on quality.
>
>As I first step I think that we should produce an up to date snapshot
>release from the current CVS head. The CVS code and documentation are in
>good shape at the moment.
>
>Would you approve such a release?
>
>Assuming log4net 1.2.9 Beta is approved, I will petition the PMC and the
>incubator for their (required) approvals.
>
>Following this release I propose that we should freeze feature
>development and concentrate on quality. Before the 1.2 final release
>there will be one (or more, as required) release candidates.
>
>Nicko
>
>----
>Nicko Cadell
>log4net dev
>
RE: [POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
Posted by Gert Driesen <ge...@telenet.be>.
Definitely +1 on this !
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicko Cadell [mailto:nicko@neoworks.com]
> Sent: zondag 20 februari 2005 19:43
> To: Log4NET Dev
> Subject: [POLL] New Release 1.2.9 Beta
>
> Hi all,
>
> It has been rather a long time since the last beta release of log4net,
> and an even long time since the last full release. I think it
> is time to
> focus on finalising the 1.2 release and particularly that
> means focusing
> on quality.
>
> As I first step I think that we should produce an up to date snapshot
> release from the current CVS head. The CVS code and
> documentation are in
> good shape at the moment.
>
> Would you approve such a release?
>
> Assuming log4net 1.2.9 Beta is approved, I will petition the
> PMC and the
> incubator for their (required) approvals.
>
> Following this release I propose that we should freeze feature
> development and concentrate on quality. Before the 1.2 final release
> there will be one (or more, as required) release candidates.
>
> Nicko
>
> ----
> Nicko Cadell
> log4net dev
>
>
>