You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hama.apache.org by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org> on 2013/01/23 12:07:45 UTC
Discuss about 0.6.1 release plan
Hi all,
Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It
works well for me and some people want new release[1].
What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a Hama-0.6.1?
1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Discuss about 0.6.1 release plan
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
Let's solve the memory issue before release. ;-)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok thanks for the clarification, let's spin out 0.6.1.
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2013/1/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> The Hama-0.5/0.6 performances has decreased and memory usage has
>> increased than Hama-0.4.
>>
>> The main reason was converting (Bundle object to Bytes) overhead at
>> Message compressor (CompressionUtil.getCompressionRatio) and Avro RPC.
>>
>> In 0.6.1, both are fixed or removed.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili
>> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Edward,
>> > One concern of mine is: what about benchmarks? How does the latest Hama
>> > trunk compares with 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 ?
>> > If the above is improved then I don't see any blockers for 0.6.1.
>> > Tommaso
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/1/23 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It
>> >> works well for me and some people want new release[1].
>> >>
>> >> What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a
>> Hama-0.6.1?
>> >>
>> >> 1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> >> @eddieyoon
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Discuss about 0.6.1 release plan
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
ok thanks for the clarification, let's spin out 0.6.1.
Tommaso
2013/1/24 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> The Hama-0.5/0.6 performances has decreased and memory usage has
> increased than Hama-0.4.
>
> The main reason was converting (Bundle object to Bytes) overhead at
> Message compressor (CompressionUtil.getCompressionRatio) and Avro RPC.
>
> In 0.6.1, both are fixed or removed.
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili
> <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Edward,
> > One concern of mine is: what about benchmarks? How does the latest Hama
> > trunk compares with 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 ?
> > If the above is improved then I don't see any blockers for 0.6.1.
> > Tommaso
> >
> >
> > 2013/1/23 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It
> >> works well for me and some people want new release[1].
> >>
> >> What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a
> Hama-0.6.1?
> >>
> >> 1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> >> @eddieyoon
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>
Re: Discuss about 0.6.1 release plan
Posted by "Edward J. Yoon" <ed...@apache.org>.
The Hama-0.5/0.6 performances has decreased and memory usage has
increased than Hama-0.4.
The main reason was converting (Bundle object to Bytes) overhead at
Message compressor (CompressionUtil.getCompressionRatio) and Avro RPC.
In 0.6.1, both are fixed or removed.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Edward,
> One concern of mine is: what about benchmarks? How does the latest Hama
> trunk compares with 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 ?
> If the above is improved then I don't see any blockers for 0.6.1.
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2013/1/23 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It
>> works well for me and some people want new release[1].
>>
>> What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a Hama-0.6.1?
>>
>> 1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
>> @eddieyoon
>>
--
Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
@eddieyoon
Re: Discuss about 0.6.1 release plan
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Edward,
One concern of mine is: what about benchmarks? How does the latest Hama
trunk compares with 0.5.0 / 0.6.0 ?
If the above is improved then I don't see any blockers for 0.6.1.
Tommaso
2013/1/23 Edward J. Yoon <ed...@apache.org>
> Hi all,
>
> Today I've tested TRUNK (partitioning) on multi-nodes cluster. It
> works well for me and some people want new release[1].
>
> What do you think about release partitioning fix version as a Hama-0.6.1?
>
> 1. http://markmail.org/message/2yf4lkgdoreq37gn
>
> --
> Best Regards, Edward J. Yoon
> @eddieyoon
>