You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@continuum.apache.org by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com> on 2009/04/29 18:44:08 UTC
security.properties ignored?
In my security.properties file I have:
=================================================
user.manager.impl=ldap
ldap.bind.authenticator.enabled=true
redback.default.admin=davisp
redback.default.guest=davisp
security.policy.password.expiration.enabled=false
ldap.config.hostname=ldap-corp.myco.com
ldap.config.port=389
ldap.config.base.dn=ou=People,ou=Corporate,dc=myco,dc=com
ldap.config.context.factory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
ldap.config.bind.dn=
ldap.config.password=
ldap.config.authentication.method=
=================================================
But, when I access the app I see it searching for user 'admin' in ldap
instead of davisp.
Ideally, I'd like the admin and guest users to be handled locally and not by
ldap.
However, trying to map the admin user to myself doesn't seem to work.
am I missing something?
Re: security.properties ignored?
Posted by Paul Davis <pa...@gmail.com>.
Turns out in my absurd quest to make it work I had an extra
securities.properties file
doh!
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 5:31 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Where did you store the file? Unless you configured LDAP elsewhere, the
> file must be read if LDAP is being used.
>
>
> On 30/04/2009, at 2:44 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> In my security.properties file I have:
>> =================================================
>> user.manager.impl=ldap
>> ldap.bind.authenticator.enabled=true
>> redback.default.admin=davisp
>> redback.default.guest=davisp
>> security.policy.password.expiration.enabled=false
>>
>> ldap.config.hostname=ldap-corp.myco.com
>> ldap.config.port=389
>> ldap.config.base.dn=ou=People,ou=Corporate,dc=myco,dc=com
>> ldap.config.context.factory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
>> ldap.config.bind.dn=
>> ldap.config.password=
>> ldap.config.authentication.method=
>> =================================================
>>
>> But, when I access the app I see it searching for user 'admin' in ldap
>> instead of davisp.
>>
>> Ideally, I'd like the admin and guest users to be handled locally and not
>> by
>> ldap.
>> However, trying to map the admin user to myself doesn't seem to work.
>>
>> am I missing something?
>>
>
>
Re: security.properties ignored?
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Where did you store the file? Unless you configured LDAP elsewhere,
the file must be read if LDAP is being used.
On 30/04/2009, at 2:44 AM, Paul Davis wrote:
> In my security.properties file I have:
> =================================================
> user.manager.impl=ldap
> ldap.bind.authenticator.enabled=true
> redback.default.admin=davisp
> redback.default.guest=davisp
> security.policy.password.expiration.enabled=false
>
> ldap.config.hostname=ldap-corp.myco.com
> ldap.config.port=389
> ldap.config.base.dn=ou=People,ou=Corporate,dc=myco,dc=com
> ldap.config.context.factory=com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtxFactory
> ldap.config.bind.dn=
> ldap.config.password=
> ldap.config.authentication.method=
> =================================================
>
> But, when I access the app I see it searching for user 'admin' in ldap
> instead of davisp.
>
> Ideally, I'd like the admin and guest users to be handled locally
> and not by
> ldap.
> However, trying to map the admin user to myself doesn't seem to work.
>
> am I missing something?