[jira] [Resolved] (CLOUDSTACK-969) api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical network

["Alena Prokharchyk (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alena Prokharchyk resolved CLOUDSTACK-969.
------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed with 351cc829e3dbdd27c740b8e4a0e8c3afa6252ff1

> api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical network
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-969
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-969
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam
>            Assignee: Alena Prokharchyk
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: marvin
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>
> While looking through CLOUDSTACK-968 I notice that the ZoneResponse.java still contains the vlan that used to be part of 2.2. This vlan now belongs to the PhysicalNetworkResponse.java. Right now shows up in Marvin's response classes for createZoneResponse
> public class ZoneResponse extends BaseResponse {
>  . ..
>     @SerializedName(ApiConstants.VLAN) @Param(description="the vlan range of the zone")
>     private String vlan;
> ..
> }
> public class PhysicalNetworkResponse extends BaseResponse {
> ...
>     @SerializedName(ApiConstants.VLAN) @Param(description="the vlan of the physical network")
>     private String vlan;
> ...
> }
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen <sh...@gmail.com>wrote
> It seems that if I set a vlan range for a zone, marvin attempts to
> set that vlan range for every physical network defined for the zone. So the
> first one succeeds, the second one fails. The vlan property should be moved
> up to be a member of the physical network as far as marvin is concerned.
> We're in the process of making changes that allow you to use the same vlan
> numbers on different physical networks anyway, since it's possible that you
> can have completely separate infrastructure on each nic



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)