You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Damian Guy (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/03/07 14:56:38 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-4657) Improve test coverage of
CompositeReadOnlyWindowStore
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4657?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Damian Guy updated KAFKA-4657:
------------------------------
Description:
No tests that cover what happens when {{windowStore.fetch(...)}} throw an {{InvalidStateStoreException}}, i.e., we should check that we get an {{InvalidStateStoreException}} with the modified message.
There are no tests that cover the {{WindowStoreIterator}} that is returned when there are no results. In this case we should at least add tests that show the expected behaviour for {{peekNextKey}}, {{hasNext}}, and {{next}}
was:exceptions not covered and internal iterator
> Improve test coverage of CompositeReadOnlyWindowStore
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: KAFKA-4657
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-4657
> Project: Kafka
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: streams
> Reporter: Damian Guy
> Fix For: 0.11.0.0
>
>
> No tests that cover what happens when {{windowStore.fetch(...)}} throw an {{InvalidStateStoreException}}, i.e., we should check that we get an {{InvalidStateStoreException}} with the modified message.
> There are no tests that cover the {{WindowStoreIterator}} that is returned when there are no results. In this case we should at least add tests that show the expected behaviour for {{peekNextKey}}, {{hasNext}}, and {{next}}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)