You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/16 14:01:04 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alex Parvulescu updated OAK-6225:
---------------------------------
    Attachment: groupimpl-v0.patch

> Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-6225
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Alex Parvulescu
>         Attachments: groupimpl-v0.patch
>
>
> As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members.
> Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup.
> WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise.
> fyi [~anchela]
> [0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)