You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> on 2015/10/14 00:30:52 UTC
[VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Hi!
As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
basis. The proposed policy is this:
- a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
- after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
[DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC members to
make a nomination for the next year
- it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
herself
- there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as an
Apache Ignite Chair.
Each term, however is exactly one year.
[ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
Thanks,
Cos
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
With 10 +1's; none of the -1's or 0's the [VOTE] has passed.
Thanks everyone for voting!
Cos
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:30PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
+1 [binding]
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:30PM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@gridgain.com>.
+1 (binding)
On 10/14/2015 1:30 AM, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Sergi
2015-10-14 10:28 GMT+03:00 Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>:
> +1 (binding)
> On 13 Oct 2015 23:27, "Konstantin Boudnik" <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> > propose
> > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> > yearly
> > basis. The proposed policy is this:
> > - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> > - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> > [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> > members to
> > make a nomination for the next year
> > - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> > herself
> > - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> > an
> > Apache Ignite Chair.
> >
> > Each term, however is exactly one year.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
> >
> > This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>.
+1 (binding)
On 13 Oct 2015 23:27, "Konstantin Boudnik" <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Nikita Ivanov <ni...@gmail.com>.
+1
--
Nikita Ivanov
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Alexey Goncharuk <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
2015-10-14 18:08 GMT+03:00 Anton Vinogradov <av...@gridgain.com>:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Gianfranco Murador <mu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > 2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > --Yakov
> > >
> > > 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> > > > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last
> month, I
> > > > propose
> > > > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> > > > yearly
> > > > basis. The proposed policy is this:
> > > > - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> > > > - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> > > > [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> > > > members to
> > > > make a nomination for the next year
> > > > - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him
> or
> > > > herself
> > > > - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can
> serve
> > as
> > > > an
> > > > Apache Ignite Chair.
> > > >
> > > > Each term, however is exactly one year.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
> > > >
> > > > This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Gianfranco Murador
> > Igniter and Software Engineer.
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Anton Vinogradov <av...@gridgain.com>.
+1 (binding)
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Gianfranco Murador <mu...@apache.org>
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> 2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > --Yakov
> >
> > 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> > > propose
> > > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> > > yearly
> > > basis. The proposed policy is this:
> > > - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> > > - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> > > [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> > > members to
> > > make a nomination for the next year
> > > - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> > > herself
> > > - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve
> as
> > > an
> > > Apache Ignite Chair.
> > >
> > > Each term, however is exactly one year.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
> > >
> > > This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Cos
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Gianfranco Murador
> Igniter and Software Engineer.
>
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Gianfranco Murador <mu...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
2015-10-14 15:46 GMT+02:00 Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>:
> +1 (binding)
>
> --Yakov
>
> 2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> > propose
> > that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> > yearly
> > basis. The proposed policy is this:
> > - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> > - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> > [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> > members to
> > make a nomination for the next year
> > - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> > herself
> > - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> > an
> > Apache Ignite Chair.
> >
> > Each term, however is exactly one year.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
> >
> > This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Cos
> >
>
--
Gianfranco Murador
Igniter and Software Engineer.
Re: [VOTE] Establishing duration of Apache Ignite Chair rotation
Posted by Yakov Zhdanov <yz...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
--Yakov
2015-10-14 1:30 GMT+03:00 Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>:
> Hi!
>
> As discussed in the "[DISCUSS] PMC Chair rotation" thread last month, I
> propose
> that we adopt a rule allowing for a Apache Ignite Chair rotation on a
> yearly
> basis. The proposed policy is this:
> - a position of an Apache Ignite Chair gets elected for a year
> - after a year passes it is expected of the active Chair to start a
> [DISCUSS] email thread on private@ignite.apache.org asking PMC
> members to
> make a nomination for the next year
> - it is perfectly acceptable for the active chair to nominate him or
> herself
> - there is no limit on the number of terms that one person can serve as
> an
> Apache Ignite Chair.
>
> Each term, however is exactly one year.
>
> [ ] +1 Adopt the Apache Ingite Chair rotation policy
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the proposed policy (please provide a reason)
>
> This VOTE will be held open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Thanks,
> Cos
>