You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de> on 2004/06/29 10:35:20 UTC
RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot sources)
Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> Considering how discussion goes around this problem, I'm starting to
> consider David's proposal
Sorry, what is David's proposal?
Carsten
RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for
third-party snapshot sources)
Posted by Antonio Gallardo <ag...@agssa.net>.
Carsten Ziegeler dijo:
> David Crossley wrote:
>> [+1] do not keep sources
>> and use a full timestamp (as UTC time) in the jar filename
>> so that people can get the sources from the relevant
>> external CVS, e.g. foobar-20040628T0824.jar
>
> +1
+1 too.
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE: [VOTE] preservation policy for third-party snapshot sources)
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@s-und-n.de>.
Ok, got it myself:
David Crossley wrote:
> [+1] do not keep sources
> and use a full timestamp (as UTC time) in the jar filename
> so that people can get the sources from the relevant
> external CVS, e.g. foobar-20040628T0824.jar
+1
Carsten
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziegeler@s-und-n.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: dev@cocoon.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Cocoon is not gump! ( was RE: [VOTE]
> preservation policy for third-party snapshot sources)
>
> Sylvain Wallez wrote:
> > Considering how discussion goes around this problem, I'm
> starting to
> > consider David's proposal
>
> Sorry, what is David's proposal?
>
> Carsten
>
>