You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com> on 2009/12/23 18:56:54 UTC
[VOTE] Release build 6.0.22
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before
next week and before enough votes.
Merry Christmas
Jean-Frederic
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.22
Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2010/1/1 Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>:
>
> I saw that but wasn't too bothered about it. The issue was the corrupted
> binaries in both the src distros.
>
>>> A number of
>>> binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been
>>> modified. Further investigation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't
>>> quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for
>>> 6.0.x and 5.5.x
>>
I should note, that only the src distros are broken.
The exe/dll and other files in the binary archives and the exe installer are OK.
There is one problem I noticed while running this build: TC version
info is wrong.
Here is the contents of ServerInfo.properties:
server.info=Apache Tomcat/6.0-snapshot
server.number=6.0.0.0
server.built=December 23 2009 1829
Thus,
[x] Broken
>
> Cheers
>
>> Happy New year
> +1
+1
Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.22
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 01/01/2010 11:05, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Neither the src.zip nor the src.tar.gz matches the tag.
>
> +++
> Index: build.properties.default
> ===================================================================
> --- build.properties.default (revision 893580)
> +++ build.properties.default (working copy)
> @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
> version.minor=0
> version.build=0
> version.patch=0
> -version=6.0-snapshot
> +version=6.0.22
>
> # ----- Default Base Path for Dependent Packages -----
> # Please note this path must be absolute, not relative,
> +++
> Correct?
I saw that but wasn't too bothered about it. The issue was the corrupted
binaries in both the src distros.
>> A number of
>> binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been
>> modified. Further investigation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't
>> quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for
>> 6.0.x and 5.5.x
>
> I voted it :-)
Cheers
> Happy New year
+1
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.22
Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 12/31/2009 01:57 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
>> [X] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] Stable
>>
>> 6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before
>> next week and before enough votes.
>
> Checked src.zip, src.tar.gz, zip, widows-x64.zip & exe
>
> MD5s good
> Signatures good, key in web of trust
>
> Neither the src.zip nor the src.tar.gz matches the tag.
+++
Index: build.properties.default
===================================================================
--- build.properties.default (revision 893580)
+++ build.properties.default (working copy)
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
version.minor=0
version.build=0
version.patch=0
-version=6.0-snapshot
+version=6.0.22
# ----- Default Base Path for Dependent Packages -----
# Please note this path must be absolute, not relative,
+++
Correct?
> A number of
> binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been
> modified. Further investigation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't
> quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for
> 6.0.x and 5.5.x
I voted it :-)
Happy New year
Jean-Frederic
>
> Mark
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.22
Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 23/12/2009 17:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.22/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.22 tag is:
> [X] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Stable
>
> 6.0.21 was too broken to be used. Take your time I won't release before
> next week and before enough votes.
Checked src.zip, src.tar.gz, zip, widows-x64.zip & exe
MD5s good
Signatures good, key in web of trust
Neither the src.zip nor the src.tar.gz matches the tag. A number of
binary files of various types (.exe, gif, bmp) look to have been
modified. Further investigtation shows the fail-safe EOL patch wasn't
quite right. I have fixed trunk and proposed the necessary fixes for
6.0.x and 5.5.x
Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org