You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com> on 2019/01/05 16:38:58 UTC
uimaj-eclipse-update-site vs ruta-eclipse-update-site maven build
config
Hi,
I currently try to provide an RC for ruta and I try to think about the
required changes to the maven build process of the update site. Taking a
look at the uimaj-eclipse-update-site and the UIMA wide parent pom, is
the configuration in the uimaj-eclipse-update-site really necessary, or
did I miss something?
Best,
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Klügl
R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning
Averbis GmbH
Tennenbacher Str. 11
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Fon: +49 761 708 394 0
Fax: +49 761 708 394 10
Email: peter.kluegl@averbis.com
Web: https://averbis.com
Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau
Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080
Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó
Re: uimaj-eclipse-update-site vs ruta-eclipse-update-site maven build
config
Posted by Peter Klügl <pe...@averbis.com>.
Thanks Marshall :-)
Yes, I was referring to v2.
Ruta v3 is still waiting for uimaFIT v3 ;-)
Best,
Peter
Am 07.01.2019 um 15:32 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> the difference between these:
>
> (looking at uima v2)
>
> The uimaj-eclipse-update-site could have used the common build pom for the step
> "BuildUpdateSite-pack-svnget-buildMetadata-commit-to-dev"
>
> except for one "improvement", which was done after the uima-wide pom release 12
> happened.
>
> This is the bit that tests dropPrevVersions:
> line 153: <equals arg1="${dropPrevVersions}" arg2="false" />
>
> It allows a programmatic way to skip checking out previous versions when you
> want to "clean up" the eclipse update site for your project. For uima v3, this
> was used to support a different update site for those plugins.
>
> I'm guessing you won't need this, though.
>
> You do need the rest of the config in the eclipse-update-site, of course, which
> configures what features/plugins go into the site.
>
> See also https://uima.apache.org/dev-eclipse-plugin-archiving
>
> -Marshall
>
> On 1/5/2019 11:38 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I currently try to provide an RC for ruta and I try to think about the
>> required changes to the maven build process of the update site. Taking a
>> look at the uimaj-eclipse-update-site and the UIMA wide parent pom, is
>> the configuration in the uimaj-eclipse-update-site really necessary, or
>> did I miss something?
>>
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>
>> Peter
>>
>>
--
Dr. Peter Klügl
R&D Text Mining/Machine Learning
Averbis GmbH
Tennenbacher Str. 11
79106 Freiburg
Germany
Fon: +49 761 708 394 0
Fax: +49 761 708 394 10
Email: peter.kluegl@averbis.com
Web: https://averbis.com
Headquarters: Freiburg im Breisgau
Register Court: Amtsgericht Freiburg im Breisgau, HRB 701080
Managing Directors: Dr. med. Philipp Daumke, Dr. Kornél Markó
Re: uimaj-eclipse-update-site vs ruta-eclipse-update-site maven build
config
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
the difference between these:
(looking at uima v2)
The uimaj-eclipse-update-site could have used the common build pom for the step
"BuildUpdateSite-pack-svnget-buildMetadata-commit-to-dev"
except for one "improvement", which was done after the uima-wide pom release 12
happened.
This is the bit that tests dropPrevVersions:
line 153: <equals arg1="${dropPrevVersions}" arg2="false" />
It allows a programmatic way to skip checking out previous versions when you
want to "clean up" the eclipse update site for your project. For uima v3, this
was used to support a different update site for those plugins.
I'm guessing you won't need this, though.
You do need the rest of the config in the eclipse-update-site, of course, which
configures what features/plugins go into the site.
See also https://uima.apache.org/dev-eclipse-plugin-archiving
-Marshall
On 1/5/2019 11:38 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I currently try to provide an RC for ruta and I try to think about the
> required changes to the maven build process of the update site. Taking a
> look at the uimaj-eclipse-update-site and the UIMA wide parent pom, is
> the configuration in the uimaj-eclipse-update-site really necessary, or
> did I miss something?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>
Re: uimaj-eclipse-update-site vs ruta-eclipse-update-site maven build
config
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
are you looking at uimaj v2 or v3 ?
On 1/5/2019 11:38 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I currently try to provide an RC for ruta and I try to think about the
> required changes to the maven build process of the update site. Taking a
> look at the uimaj-eclipse-update-site and the UIMA wide parent pom, is
> the configuration in the uimaj-eclipse-update-site really necessary, or
> did I miss something?
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Peter
>
>