You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tvm.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/01/14 19:21:40 UTC
[GitHub] [incubator-tvm] huajsj edited a comment on issue #4703: [VTA]
Support network which have no unique operator as start/stop name for graph
pack.
huajsj edited a comment on issue #4703: [VTA] Support network which have no unique operator as start/stop name for graph pack.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-tvm/pull/4703#issuecomment-574325187
Hi Liangfu, Thanks for the comments, the reason here to use operator name and indices is to first compatible with existing implementation like resnet18 example, secondly try to make the logic to
be more readable for that from my point operator name is more friendly than indices only. please kindly let me know how you think.
Regards
Hua
> This is a favorable feature, since there could be more than one operator with the given name.
>
> I wonder whether we can bring the unique name of the layer, instead of the name of the operator, to define the subgraph. I think using indices of the named operators are less intuitive, comparing to unique names of the layers.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
With regards,
Apache Git Services