You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/09/06 18:46:35 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36523] - task, incompatibleWithSpawn is too restrictive

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36523>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36523


stevel@apache.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From stevel@apache.org  2005-09-06 18:46 -------
can you check out the latest source from SVN, to see if it is better. Some
fixing of the bitsetting was done, but maybe not enough.

as it is, I have to agree with you; IMO we should not have an incompatible flag
on the setters, but work it out based on the state of values inside execute
itself(), the way most other tasks do. Patches would be welcome here, with the
caveat that as Java is used so broadly, we dont want to break anything

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org