You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "Venu Yanamandra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/10 04:38:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HIVE-19484) 'IN' & '=' do not behave the same way
for Date/Timestamp comparison.
Venu Yanamandra created HIVE-19484:
--------------------------------------
Summary: 'IN' & '=' do not behave the same way for Date/Timestamp comparison.
Key: HIVE-19484
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-19484
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Venu Yanamandra
We find that there is a difference in the way '=' operator and 'IN' behave when operating on timestamps.
The issue could be demonstrated using below -
i) create table test_table (test_date timestamp);
ii) insert into test_table values('2018-01-01');
iii) select * from test_table where test_date='2018-01-01'; -- Works
iv) select * from test_table where test_date in ('2018-01-01'); -- Fails with error [1]
v) However, casting works -
select * from test_table where test_date in (cast ('2018-01-01' as timestamp));
As per url [2], we find no references to limitations when '=' or 'IN' are used.
As per the url [3], we find that there are implicit type conversions defined. However, '=' operates in a different way than the 'IN' operator.
We would like to see if 'IN' could be made to behave the same way as '='.
[1]:
Caused by: org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.exec.UDFArgumentException: The arguments for IN should be the same type! Types are: {timestamp IN (string)}
[2]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+UDF#LanguageManualUDF-LogicalOperators
[3]:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+Types#LanguageManualTypes-AllowedImplicitConversions
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)