You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de> on 2016/02/24 11:44:14 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Hi,

* elukey@apache.org wrote:

> Author: elukey
> Date: Wed Feb 24 07:28:24 2016
> New Revision: 1732029
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732029&view=rev
> Log:
> Added retirement banner to all the documentation pages to suggest the
> migration to 2.4

Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?

Cheers,
nd
-- 
Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>

Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Luca Toscano wrote:

> Hi André!
>
> 2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>:
> > Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?
>
> I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0
> one as reference):
>
> "This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no
> longer maintained. Upgrade, and refer to the current version of httpd
> instead, documented at:"
>
> to
>
> "This document refers to a legacy release (2.2) of Apache httpd. The active
> release (2.4) is documented here. If you have not already upgraded, please
> follow this link for more information."
>
>
> The 2.2 use case seems a bit different because it is legacy but still
> supported, so I thought to add a more conservative message. I consequently
> changed the translated banners to avoid confusion, but we might just decide
> to go for the "no longer maintained" original option to keep all the
> translations.

Ah, didn't get that. Thanks!

> Let me know if you want me to amend my change, or just rollback it entirely
> to study a better solution.

Nah, it's just fine ;)


Cheers,
nd
-- 
Already I've seen people (really!) write web URLs in the form:
http:\\some.site.somewhere
[...] How soon until greengrocers start writing "apples $1\pound"
or something?                           -- Joona I Palaste in clc

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org


Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Luca Toscano wrote:

> Hi André!
>
> 2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>:
> > Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?
>
> I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0
> one as reference):
>
> "This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no
> longer maintained. Upgrade, and refer to the current version of httpd
> instead, documented at:"
>
> to
>
> "This document refers to a legacy release (2.2) of Apache httpd. The active
> release (2.4) is documented here. If you have not already upgraded, please
> follow this link for more information."
>
>
> The 2.2 use case seems a bit different because it is legacy but still
> supported, so I thought to add a more conservative message. I consequently
> changed the translated banners to avoid confusion, but we might just decide
> to go for the "no longer maintained" original option to keep all the
> translations.

Ah, didn't get that. Thanks!

> Let me know if you want me to amend my change, or just rollback it entirely
> to study a better solution.

Nah, it's just fine ;)


Cheers,
nd
-- 
Already I've seen people (really!) write web URLs in the form:
http:\\some.site.somewhere
[...] How soon until greengrocers start writing "apples $1\pound"
or something?                           -- Joona I Palaste in clc

Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Posted by Luca Toscano <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi André!

2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>:
>
>
> Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?
>
>
I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0
one as reference):

"This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no
longer maintained. Upgrade, and refer to the current version of httpd
instead, documented at:"

to

"This document refers to a legacy release (2.2) of Apache httpd. The active
release (2.4) is documented here. If you have not already upgraded, please
follow this link for more information."


The 2.2 use case seems a bit different because it is legacy but still
supported, so I thought to add a more conservative message. I consequently
changed the translated banners to avoid confusion, but we might just decide
to go for the "no longer maintained" original option to keep all the
translations.

Let me know if you want me to amend my change, or just rollback it entirely
to study a better solution.

Thanks!

Luca

Re: svn commit: r1732029 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual: ./ style/ style/lang/ style/xsl/

Posted by Luca Toscano <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi André!

2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>:
>
>
> Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?
>
>
I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0
one as reference):

"This document refers to the 2.0 version of Apache httpd, which is no
longer maintained. Upgrade, and refer to the current version of httpd
instead, documented at:"

to

"This document refers to a legacy release (2.2) of Apache httpd. The active
release (2.4) is documented here. If you have not already upgraded, please
follow this link for more information."


The 2.2 use case seems a bit different because it is legacy but still
supported, so I thought to add a more conservative message. I consequently
changed the translated banners to avoid confusion, but we might just decide
to go for the "no longer maintained" original option to keep all the
translations.

Let me know if you want me to amend my change, or just rollback it entirely
to study a better solution.

Thanks!

Luca