You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Liwei Lin (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/03/07 06:36:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-20654) Unaligned checkpoint recovery may
lead to corrupted data stream
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17296771#comment-17296771 ]
Liwei Lin commented on FLINK-20654:
-----------------------------------
hi [~pnowojski] , does this also affect Flink 1.11.3 ?
And another thing we'd like to know is, is unaligned checkpoint production-ready as of Flink 1.11.3 or 1.12.2 ?
thanks! :)
> Unaligned checkpoint recovery may lead to corrupted data stream
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-20654
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-20654
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Runtime / Checkpointing
> Affects Versions: 1.12.0, 1.12.1
> Reporter: Arvid Heise
> Assignee: Piotr Nowojski
> Priority: Blocker
> Labels: pull-request-available, test-stability
> Fix For: 1.12.2, 1.13.0
>
>
> Fix of FLINK-20433 shows potential corruption after recovery for all variations of UnalignedCheckpointITCase.
> To reproduce, run UCITCase a couple hundreds times. The issue showed for me in:
> - execute [Parallel union, p = 5]
> - execute [Parallel union, p = 10]
> - execute [Parallel cogroup, p = 5]
> - execute [parallel pipeline with remote channels, p = 5]
> with decreasing frequency.
> The issue manifests as one of the following issues:
> - stream corrupted exception
> - EOF exception
> - assertion failure in NUM_LOST or NUM_OUT_OF_ORDER
> - (for union) ArithmeticException overflow (because the number that should be [0;100000] has been mis-deserialized)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)