You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Lin Zeng (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/21 09:50:04 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (HADOOP-14261) Some refactoring work for erasure
coding raw coder
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Lin Zeng updated HADOOP-14261:
------------------------------
Attachment: HADOOP-14261.001.patch
# Refactor work:
#* Rename RSRawDecoderLegacy to RSLegacyRawDecoder.
#* Rename RSRawEncoderLegacy to RSLegacyRawEncoder.
#* Rename RSRawErasureCoderFactoryLegacy to RSLegacyRawErasureCoderFactory.
#* TestRSRawCoderLegacy to TestRSLegacyRawCoder.
# Create RawEncoder and RawDecoder via the appropriate factory.
> Some refactoring work for erasure coding raw coder
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14261
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14261
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Kai Zheng
> Assignee: Lin Zeng
> Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha3
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-14261.001.patch
>
>
> This is from [~andrew.wang] commented in HADOOP-13200:
> {quote}
> Other questions/comments from looking at this code:
> We also should rename RSRawEncoderLegacy to RSLegacyRawEncoder and RSRawErasureCoderFactoryLegacy to RSLegacyErasureCoderFactory, to match the naming of other subclasses.
> TestRawEncoderBase, should this use a configured factory to get the raw coders, rather than referencing the raw coders directly? I didn't check other usages, but it seems like we should be creating via the appropriate factory whenever possible.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org