You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@flex.apache.org by peetor <mr...@gmail.com> on 2014/05/31 15:24:35 UTC
Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Hi guys,
Just updated to latest SDK (4.12.1) and I'm seeing in an application using
mx components various erroneous truncation occurring on form item labels and
regular labels (when there should be space to resize layout and fit in all
text). It's happening on forms, left aligned and right aligned labels that
all have plenty of surrounding space so as not to require truncation.
Is there an easy work around someone can suggest as the updated SDK adds
brilliantly crisp fonts and would be nice to keep it
Thanks
Peter
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Please file a JIRA issue with the source and SWF that displays fuzzy text.
I want to understand that before I continue exploring the truncation
issue.
On 6/2/14 10:52 PM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>When I use my 4.9.1 SDK on a simple app yes can replicate them
>
>
>
>and i can see this type of fuzzy text in another 3rd party AIR app
>
>
>On 3 Jun 2014, at 07:15, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, your 4.9.1 version is not only fuzzier, but the rounded corners
>>on
>> buttons look terrible. Can you reproduce fuzzy text and crufty corners
>>in
>> a simple app?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/2/14 10:09 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >It’s a desktop app, no applicationDPI or runtimeDPI set, no embedding
>> >fonts. No widths set on labels.
>> >
>> >The 4.9.1 might look zoomed as the text is noticeably fuzzier when I
>> >switch back to the old SDK.
>> >
>> >
>> >On 3 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI?
>>Are
>> >>you
>> >> embedding fonts?
>> >>
>> >> The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are
>> >>set
>> >> pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom
>>level
>> >>is
>> >> used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in
>> >> truncation.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what
>> >>looks
>> >> >> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
>> >> >> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
>> >> >>identical
>> >> >> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true
>> >>for
>> >> >>both
>> >> >> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer
>>so
>> >>AIR
>> >> >> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
>> >> >> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new
>> >>SDK
>> >> >> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro
>>retina
>> >>at
>> >> >> >least).
>> >> >> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
>> >> >> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
>> >> >>whatever
>> >> >> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to
>> >>fuzz
>> >> >>the
>> >> >> >> >>text,
>> >> >> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
>> >> >>spaces
>> >> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> >> there.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case
>> >>but
>> >> >>thus
>> >> >> >> >>far
>> >> >> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount
>>of
>> >>the
>> >> >> >>same
>> >> >> >> >>code
>> >> >> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very
>>small
>> >> >> >>resource
>> >> >> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+
>>classes)
>> >> >>and
>> >> >> >> >>using
>> >> >> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex
>>Users]
>> >> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
>> >> >>machine
>> >> >> >>at
>> >> >> >> >> >>least by
>> >> >> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and
>>setting
>> >>an
>> >> >> >> >>explicit
>> >> >> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to
>>the
>> >> >> >> >>excellently
>> >> >> >> >> >>sharp
>> >> >> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't
>>know
>> >>if
>> >> >> >>that
>> >> >> >> >>was
>> >> >> >> >> >>AIR
>> >> >> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Cheers
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Peter
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-tru
>>>>>>>>>>>>>nc
>> >>>>>>>>>>>at
>> >> >>>>>>>>>io
>> >> >> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >> >> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added
>>to
>> >>the
>> >> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trun
>>>>>>>>>>>>ca
>> >>>>>>>>>>ti
>> >> >>>>>>>>on
>> >> >> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> >> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels,
>> >>click
>> >> >> >>here.
>> >> >> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunc
>>>>>>>>>>>at
>> >>>>>>>>>io
>> >> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to
>>the
>> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunca
>>>>>>>>>>ti
>> >>>>>>>>on
>> >> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
>> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels,
>>click
>> >> >>here.
>> >> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/
>>>>>>>>>Ar
>> >>>>>>>ch
>> >> >>>>>iv
>> >> >> >>>e.
>> >> >> >> >zip>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat
>>>>>>>>>io
>> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
>> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati
>>>>>>>>on
>> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>> >>here.
>> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
>> >> >> ><<a
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/
>>>>>>0/
>> >>>>Ar
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/671
>>>>>>9/
>> >>>>0/
>> >> >>Archive%
>> >> >> >202.zip>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
>>>>>>>n-
>> >>>>>of
>> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
>> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>>Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
>>>>>>-o
>> >>>>f-
>> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>>here.
>> >> >> NAML
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Archive 3.zip (155K)
>> >> ><<a
>>
>>>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/
>>>>Ar
>>
>>>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/
>>>>0/
>> >>Archive%
>> >> >203.zip>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >>
>>
>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
>>>>>of
>> >>>-m
>> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6721.html
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >>discussion below:
>> >>
>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
>>>>f-
>> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6749.html
>> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> >> NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6750.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6751.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>Screen Shot 2014-06-03 at 07.45.08.png (138K)
><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6752/0/Screen%2
>0Shot%202014-06-03%20at%2007.45.08.png>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6752.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
When I use my 4.9.1 SDK on a simple app yes can replicate them
and i can see this type of fuzzy text in another 3rd party AIR app
On 3 Jun 2014, at 07:15, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Yeah, your 4.9.1 version is not only fuzzier, but the rounded corners on
> buttons look terrible. Can you reproduce fuzzy text and crufty corners in
> a simple app?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 6/2/14 10:09 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >It’s a desktop app, no applicationDPI or runtimeDPI set, no embedding
> >fonts. No widths set on labels.
> >
> >The 4.9.1 might look zoomed as the text is noticeably fuzzier when I
> >switch back to the old SDK.
> >
> >
> >On 3 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI? Are
> >>you
> >> embedding fonts?
> >>
> >> The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are
> >>set
> >> pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom level
> >>is
> >> used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in
> >> truncation.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what
> >>looks
> >> >> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
> >> >> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
> >> >>identical
> >> >> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true
> >>for
> >> >>both
> >> >> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so
> >>AIR
> >> >> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
> >> >> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new
> >>SDK
> >> >> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina
> >>at
> >> >> >least).
> >> >> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
> >> >> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
> >> >>whatever
> >> >> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to
> >>fuzz
> >> >>the
> >> >> >> >>text,
> >> >> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
> >> >>spaces
> >> >> >>in
> >> >> >> >> there.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case
> >>but
> >> >>thus
> >> >> >> >>far
> >> >> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of
> >>the
> >> >> >>same
> >> >> >> >>code
> >> >> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
> >> >> >>resource
> >> >> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes)
> >> >>and
> >> >> >> >>using
> >> >> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
> >> >>machine
> >> >> >>at
> >> >> >> >> >>least by
> >> >> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting
> >>an
> >> >> >> >>explicit
> >> >> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> >> >> >> >>excellently
> >> >> >> >> >>sharp
> >> >> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know
> >>if
> >> >> >>that
> >> >> >> >>was
> >> >> >> >> >>AIR
> >> >> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >> >> >> >Peter
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunc
> >>>>>>>>>>>at
> >> >>>>>>>>>io
> >> >> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >> >> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to
> >>the
> >> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunca
> >>>>>>>>>>ti
> >> >>>>>>>>on
> >> >> >>>>>>-o
> >> >> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> >> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels,
> >>click
> >> >> >>here.
> >> >> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat
> >>>>>>>>>io
> >> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati
> >>>>>>>>on
> >> >>>>>>-o
> >> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> >> >>here.
> >> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Ar
> >>>>>>>ch
> >> >>>>>iv
> >> >> >>>e.
> >> >> >> >zip>
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
> >>>>>>-o
> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> >>here.
> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
> >> >> ><<a
> >>
> >>>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/
> >>>>Ar
> >>
> >>>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/
> >>>>0/
> >> >>Archive%
> >> >> >202.zip>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> >>>>>of
> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> >>>>f-
> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> >> NAML
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Archive 3.zip (155K)
> >> ><<a
> >>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Ar
> >>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/
> >>Archive%
> >> >203.zip>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >>
> >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> >>>-m
> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6721.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >>discussion below:
> >>
> >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6749.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> NAML
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6750.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6751.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
Screen Shot 2014-06-03 at 07.45.08.png (138K) <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6752/0/Screen%20Shot%202014-06-03%20at%2007.45.08.png>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6752.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Yeah, your 4.9.1 version is not only fuzzier, but the rounded corners on
buttons look terrible. Can you reproduce fuzzy text and crufty corners in
a simple app?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 6/2/14 10:09 PM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>It’s a desktop app, no applicationDPI or runtimeDPI set, no embedding
>fonts. No widths set on labels.
>
>The 4.9.1 might look zoomed as the text is noticeably fuzzier when I
>switch back to the old SDK.
>
>
>On 3 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI? Are
>>you
>> embedding fonts?
>>
>> The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are
>>set
>> pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom level
>>is
>> used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in
>> truncation.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what
>>looks
>> >> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
>> >> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
>> >>identical
>> >> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true
>>for
>> >>both
>> >> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so
>>AIR
>> >> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
>> >> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new
>>SDK
>> >> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina
>>at
>> >> >least).
>> >> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
>> >> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
>> >>whatever
>> >> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to
>>fuzz
>> >>the
>> >> >> >>text,
>> >> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
>> >>spaces
>> >> >>in
>> >> >> >> there.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case
>>but
>> >>thus
>> >> >> >>far
>> >> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of
>>the
>> >> >>same
>> >> >> >>code
>> >> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
>> >> >>resource
>> >> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes)
>> >>and
>> >> >> >>using
>> >> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
>> >>machine
>> >> >>at
>> >> >> >> >>least by
>> >> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting
>>an
>> >> >> >>explicit
>> >> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
>> >> >> >>excellently
>> >> >> >> >>sharp
>> >> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know
>>if
>> >> >>that
>> >> >> >>was
>> >> >> >> >>AIR
>> >> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >Cheers
>> >> >> >> >> >Peter
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunc
>>>>>>>>>>>at
>> >>>>>>>>>io
>> >> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to
>>the
>> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-trunca
>>>>>>>>>>ti
>> >>>>>>>>on
>> >> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels,
>>click
>> >> >>here.
>> >> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat
>>>>>>>>>io
>> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati
>>>>>>>>on
>> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>> >>here.
>> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Ar
>>>>>>>ch
>> >>>>>iv
>> >> >>>e.
>> >> >> >zip>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
>>>>>>>n-
>> >>>>>of
>> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
>> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>>Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
>>>>>>-o
>> >>>>f-
>> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>>here.
>> >> >> NAML
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
>> >> ><<a
>>
>>>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/
>>>>Ar
>>
>>>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/
>>>>0/
>> >>Archive%
>> >> >202.zip>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >>
>>
>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
>>>>>of
>> >>>-m
>> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >>discussion below:
>> >>
>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
>>>>f-
>> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
>> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> >> NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Archive 3.zip (155K)
>> ><<a
>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Ar
>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/
>>Archive%
>> >203.zip>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6721.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6749.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6750.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
It’s a desktop app, no applicationDPI or runtimeDPI set, no embedding fonts. No widths set on labels.
The 4.9.1 might look zoomed as the text is noticeably fuzzier when I switch back to the old SDK.
On 3 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI? Are you
> embedding fonts?
>
> The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are set
> pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom level is
> used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in
> truncation.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >
> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks
> >> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
> >> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
> >>identical
> >> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for
> >>both
> >> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR
> >> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
> >> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
> >> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
> >> >least).
> >> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
> >> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
> >>whatever
> >> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
> >> >>
> >> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz
> >>the
> >> >> >>text,
> >> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
> >>spaces
> >> >>in
> >> >> >> there.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but
> >>thus
> >> >> >>far
> >> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
> >> >>same
> >> >> >>code
> >> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
> >> >>resource
> >> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes)
> >>and
> >> >> >>using
> >> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
> >>machine
> >> >>at
> >> >> >> >>least by
> >> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
> >> >> >>explicit
> >> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> >> >> >>excellently
> >> >> >> >>sharp
> >> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if
> >> >>that
> >> >> >>was
> >> >> >> >>AIR
> >> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >> >> >Peter
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat
> >>>>>>>>>io
> >> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati
> >>>>>>>>on
> >> >>>>>>-o
> >> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> >> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> >> >>here.
> >> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
> >>>>>>-o
> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> >>here.
> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Arch
> >>>>>iv
> >> >>>e.
> >> >> >zip>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> >>>>>of
> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> >>>>f-
> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> >> NAML
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
> >> ><<a
> >>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Ar
> >>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/
> >>Archive%
> >> >202.zip>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >>
> >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> >>>-m
> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >>discussion below:
> >>
> >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> NAML
> >
> >
> >
> >Archive 3.zip (155K)
> ><<a href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%
> >203.zip>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6721.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6749.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6750.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Is this a mobile app? Have you set applicationDPI or runtimeDPI? Are you
embedding fonts?
The 4.9.1 version looks like it is zoomed, and maybe that widths are set
pretty tightly. If fonts are not embedded and a different zoom level is
used, the fonts may not resize with the same metrics and result in
truncation.
-Alex
On 6/1/14 11:29 PM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks
>> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
>> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
>>identical
>> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for
>>both
>> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR
>> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
>> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
>> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
>> >least).
>> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
>> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
>> >
>> >
>> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
>>whatever
>> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
>> >>
>> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
>> >> >
>> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz
>>the
>> >> >>text,
>> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
>>spaces
>> >>in
>> >> >> there.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but
>>thus
>> >> >>far
>> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
>> >>same
>> >> >>code
>> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
>> >>resource
>> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes)
>>and
>> >> >>using
>> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
>>machine
>> >>at
>> >> >> >>least by
>> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
>> >> >>explicit
>> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
>> >> >>excellently
>> >> >> >>sharp
>> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if
>> >>that
>> >> >>was
>> >> >> >>AIR
>> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Cheers
>> >> >> >> >Peter
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncat
>>>>>>>>>io
>> >>>>>>>n-
>> >> >>>>>of
>> >> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>> >>Nabble.com.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncati
>>>>>>>>on
>> >>>>>>-o
>> >> >>>>f-
>> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>> >>here.
>> >> >> >> NAML
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
>>>>>>>n-
>> >>>>>of
>> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>>Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
>>>>>>-o
>> >>>>f-
>> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>>here.
>> >> >> NAML
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
>> >>
>>
>>>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Arch
>>>>>iv
>> >>>e.
>> >> >zip>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >>
>>
>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
>>>>>of
>> >>>-m
>> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >>discussion below:
>> >>
>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
>>>>f-
>> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
>> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> >> NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
>> ><<a
>>href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Ar
>>chive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/
>>Archive%
>> >202.zip>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>Archive 3.zip (155K)
><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%
>203.zip>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6721.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
Yes I ticked all the options; though on previous installs I ticked all the
options too. So unless it was newly added(?) would be confused why it broke
truncation on this install...
On 2 Jun 2014 14:28, "jmclean [via Apache Flex Users]" <
ml-node+s2333346n6731h40@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Updating the SDK
>
> Is it possible that the optional Adobe embedded font libraries and
> utilities were ticker when installer with the installer?
>
> Justin
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6731.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here
> <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=6710&code=bXJwZXRlcm9icmllbkBnbWFpbC5jb218NjcxMHwtMzM5NTgyOTkx>
> .
> NAML
> <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6732.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Updating the SDK
Is it possible that the optional Adobe embedded font libraries and utilities were ticker when installer with the installer?
Justin
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
Updating the SDK
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM, jude [via Apache Flex Users] <
ml-node+s2333346n6724h23@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Did you figure out what changed that results in the crisper fonts?
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:29 AM, peetor <[hidden email]
> <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=6724&i=0>> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <
> > [hidden email] <http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=6724&i=1>>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what
> looks
> > > like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
> > > truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look
> identical
> > > except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for
> > both
> > > 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > > >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so
> AIR
> > > >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
> > > >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
> > > >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
> > > >least).
> > > >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
> > > >truncateToFit=false fixes.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > > ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
> > whatever
> > > >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
> > > >>
> > > >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Here you go - hope it helps
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > > >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz
> > the
> > > >> >>text,
> > > >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the
> spaces
> > > >>in
> > > >> >> there.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -Alex
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but
> > thus
> > > >> >>far
> > > >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
> > > >>same
> > > >> >>code
> > > >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
> > > >>resource
> > > >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes)
> and
> > > >> >>using
> > > >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > > >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> Thanks,
> > > >> >> >> -Alex
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local
> machine
> > > >>at
> > > >> >> >>least by
> > > >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
> > > >> >>explicit
> > > >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> > > >> >>excellently
> > > >> >> >>sharp
> > > >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know
> if
> > > >>that
> > > >> >>was
> > > >> >> >>AIR
> > > >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >Cheers
> > > >> >> >> >Peter
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >
> > > >> >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
> > > >>>>>>>n-
> > > >> >>>>>of
> > > >> >> >>>-m
> > > >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> > > >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> > > >>Nabble.com.
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > > >> >> >>discussion below:
> > > >> >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>>
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
> > > >>>>>>-o
> > > >> >>>>f-
> > > >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> > > >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels,
> click
> > > >>here.
> > > >> >> >> NAML
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >
> > > >> >> >--
> > > >> >> >View this message in context:
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> > > >>>>>of
> > > >> >>>-m
> > > >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> > > >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> > Nabble.com.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > > >> >>discussion below:
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>>>
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> > > >>>>f-
> > > >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> > > >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> > here.
> > > >> >> NAML
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Archive.zip (130K)
> > > >>
> > > >>><
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archiv
> > > >>>e.
> > > >> >zip>
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >--
> > > >> >View this message in context:
> > > >>
> > > >>>
> > http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> > > >>>-m
> > > >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> > > >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > > >>discussion below:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> > > >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> > > >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> here.
> > > >> NAML
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Archive 2.zip (92K)
> > > ><<a href="
> > <a href="
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> ">
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> > ">
> > <a href="
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> ">
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> > > >202.zip>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >View this message in context:
> > > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> > > >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
> > > >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion
> > below:
> > >
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
> > > To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> > > NAML
> >
> >
> >
> > Archive 3.zip (155K) <
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%203.zip
>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6721.html
>
> > Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6724.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here
> <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=6710&code=bXJwZXRlcm9icmllbkBnbWFpbC5jb218NjcxMHwtMzM5NTgyOTkx>
> .
> NAML
> <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6726.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by jude <fl...@gmail.com>.
Did you figure out what changed that results in the crisper fonts?
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 1:29 AM, peetor <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <
> ml-node+s2333346n6720h99@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks
> > like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
> > truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look identical
> > except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for
> both
> > 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> > >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR
> > >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
> > >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
> > >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
> > >least).
> > >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
> > >truncateToFit=false fixes.
> > >
> > >
> > >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in
> whatever
> > >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
> > >>
> > >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Here you go - hope it helps
> > >> >
> > >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz
> the
> > >> >>text,
> > >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces
> > >>in
> > >> >> there.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Alex
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but
> thus
> > >> >>far
> > >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
> > >>same
> > >> >>code
> > >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
> > >>resource
> > >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and
> > >> >>using
> > >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> > >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> Thanks,
> > >> >> >> -Alex
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine
> > >>at
> > >> >> >>least by
> > >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
> > >> >>explicit
> > >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> > >> >>excellently
> > >> >> >>sharp
> > >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if
> > >>that
> > >> >>was
> > >> >> >>AIR
> > >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >Cheers
> > >> >> >> >Peter
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >
> > >> >> >> >--
> > >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>>>>>>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
> > >>>>>>>n-
> > >> >>>>>of
> > >> >> >>>-m
> > >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> > >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> > >>Nabble.com.
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > >> >> >>discussion below:
> > >> >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>>>>>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
> > >>>>>>-o
> > >> >>>>f-
> > >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> > >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> > >>here.
> > >> >> >> NAML
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >--
> > >> >> >View this message in context:
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>>>>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> > >>>>>of
> > >> >>>-m
> > >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> > >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > >> >>discussion below:
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>>>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> > >>>>f-
> > >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> > >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> here.
> > >> >> NAML
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >Archive.zip (130K)
> > >>
> > >>><
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archiv
> > >>>e.
> > >> >zip>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >--
> > >> >View this message in context:
> > >>
> > >>>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> > >>>-m
> > >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> > >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> > >>discussion below:
> > >>
> > >>
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> > >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> > >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> > >> NAML
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >Archive 2.zip (92K)
> > ><<a href="
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> ">
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> > >202.zip>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >--
> > >View this message in context:
> > >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> > >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
> > >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
> >
> >
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
> >
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
> > To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> > NAML
>
>
>
> Archive 3.zip (155K) <
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%203.zip
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6721.html
> Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
On 2 Jun 2014, at 08:19, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks
> like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
> truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look identical
> except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for both
> 4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR
> >version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
> >Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
> >there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
> >least).
> >Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
> >truncateToFit=false fixes.
> >
> >
> >On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in whatever
> >> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
> >>
> >> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Here you go - hope it helps
> >> >
> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the
> >> >>text,
> >> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces
> >>in
> >> >> there.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus
> >> >>far
> >> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
> >>same
> >> >>code
> >> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
> >>resource
> >> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and
> >> >>using
> >> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> >> -Alex
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine
> >>at
> >> >> >>least by
> >> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
> >> >>explicit
> >> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> >> >>excellently
> >> >> >>sharp
> >> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if
> >>that
> >> >>was
> >> >> >>AIR
> >> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >> >Peter
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >--
> >> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
> >>>>>>>n-
> >> >>>>>of
> >> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
> >>Nabble.com.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
> >>>>>>-o
> >> >>>>f-
> >> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> >> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
> >>here.
> >> >> >> NAML
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> >>>>>of
> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> >>>>f-
> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> >> NAML
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Archive.zip (130K)
> >>
> >>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archiv
> >>>e.
> >> >zip>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >>
> >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> >>>-m
> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >>discussion below:
> >>
> >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> NAML
> >
> >
> >
> >Archive 2.zip (92K)
> ><<a href="http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%">http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
> >202.zip>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6720.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
Archive 3.zip (155K) <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6721/0/Archive%203.zip>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6721.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I'm unable to understand which pics are which. I see 3 with what looks
like undesirable truncation, and two that are labelled
truncateToFit=false. I'm expecting to see two images that look identical
except for some truncation difference but with truncateToFit=true for both
4.9.1 and 4.12.0.
-Alex
On 6/1/14 10:40 PM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR
>version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
>Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK
>there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at
>least).
>Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the
>truncateToFit=false fixes.
>
>
>On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in whatever
>> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
>>
>> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >Here you go - hope it helps
>> >
>> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the
>> >>text,
>> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces
>>in
>> >> there.
>> >>
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus
>> >>far
>> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the
>>same
>> >>code
>> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small
>>resource
>> >> >bundle but still no dice)
>> >> >
>> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and
>> >>using
>> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> -Alex
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine
>>at
>> >> >>least by
>> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
>> >>explicit
>> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
>> >>excellently
>> >> >>sharp
>> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if
>>that
>> >>was
>> >> >>AIR
>> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Cheers
>> >> >> >Peter
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >--
>> >> >> >View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncatio
>>>>>>>n-
>> >>>>>of
>> >> >>>-m
>> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at
>>Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >> >>discussion below:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>>
>>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation
>>>>>>-o
>> >>>>f-
>> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click
>>here.
>> >> >> NAML
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >>
>>
>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
>>>>>of
>> >>>-m
>> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >>discussion below:
>> >>
>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
>>>>f-
>> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
>> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> >> NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Archive.zip (130K)
>>
>>><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archiv
>>>e.
>> >zip>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>Archive 2.zip (92K)
><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%
>202.zip>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6719.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
Last SDK was 4.9.1. Was installed via the apache flex installer so AIR version was up to date at that point, probably 3.4?
Text was fuzzier but no overzealous truncation (whereas with new SDK there is lots of overzealous truncation - on a macbook pro retina at least).
Couple pics in archive attached of 4.9.1 version without the truncateToFit=false fixes.
On 2 Jun 2014, at 05:51, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in whatever
> version of the SDK that was working as expected?
>
> On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >Here you go - hope it helps
> >
> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the
> >>text,
> >> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces in
> >> there.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus
> >>far
> >> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the same
> >>code
> >> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small resource
> >> >bundle but still no dice)
> >> >
> >> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and
> >>using
> >> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> >> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> -Alex
> >> >>
> >> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at
> >> >>least by
> >> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
> >>explicit
> >> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
> >>excellently
> >> >>sharp
> >> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that
> >>was
> >> >>AIR
> >> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Cheers
> >> >> >Peter
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >--
> >> >> >View this message in context:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
> >>>>>of
> >> >>>-m
> >> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >> >>discussion below:
> >> >>
> >>
> >>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
> >>>>f-
> >> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> >> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> >> NAML
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >>
> >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> >>>-m
> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >>discussion below:
> >>
> >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> NAML
> >
> >
> >
> >Archive.zip (130K)
> ><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archive.
> >zip>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6718.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
Archive 2.zip (92K) <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6719/0/Archive%202.zip>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6719.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I don't think I saw before pictures. What did it look like in whatever
version of the SDK that was working as expected?
On 6/1/14 12:35 AM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Here you go - hope it helps
>
>On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the
>>text,
>> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces in
>> there.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus
>>far
>> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the same
>>code
>> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small resource
>> >bundle but still no dice)
>> >
>> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and
>>using
>> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>> >
>> >
>> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
>> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> -Alex
>> >>
>> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at
>> >>least by
>> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an
>>explicit
>> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >> >
>> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the
>>excellently
>> >>sharp
>> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that
>>was
>> >>AIR
>> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >> >
>> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >> >
>> >> >Cheers
>> >> >Peter
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >--
>> >> >View this message in context:
>> >>
>>
>>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-
>>>>>of
>> >>>-m
>> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>> >>discussion below:
>> >>
>>
>>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-o
>>>>f-
>> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> >> NAML
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>Archive.zip (130K)
><http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archive.
>zip>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6717.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
Here you go - hope it helps
On 1 Jun 2014, at 08:00, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the text,
> I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces in
> there.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus far
> >I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the same code
> >the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small resource
> >bundle but still no dice)
> >
> >The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and using
> >resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
> >
> >
> >On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
> ><[hidden email]> wrote:
> >
> >> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at
> >>least by
> >> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an explicit
> >> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >> >
> >> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the excellently
> >>sharp
> >> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that was
> >>AIR
> >> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >> >
> >> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >> >
> >> >Cheers
> >> >Peter
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >--
> >> >View this message in context:
> >>
> >>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
> >>>-m
> >> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> >>discussion below:
> >>
> >>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
> >>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> >> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> >> NAML
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6716.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
Archive.zip (130K) <http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/attachment/6717/0/Archive.zip>
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6717.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
OK, how about posting before and after bitmaps? It's ok to fuzz the text,
I just want to see how the truncation changed, so leave the spaces in
there.
-Alex
On 5/31/14 10:45 PM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I¹ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus far
>I¹m unable toŠ In a simple test case with a small amount of the same code
>the overzealous truncation didn¹t occur (I tired a very small resource
>bundle but still no dice)
>
>The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and using
>resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
>
>
>On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users]
><ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>
>> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at
>>least by
>> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an explicit
>> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>> >
>> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the excellently
>>sharp
>> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that was
>>AIR
>> >or Flex to thank for that)
>> >
>> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>> >
>> >Cheers
>> >Peter
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >View this message in context:
>>
>>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of
>>>-m
>> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
>>discussion below:
>>
>>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-
>>mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
>> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
>> NAML
>
>
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6715.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
I’ve tried replicating it in a simple standalone test case but thus far I’m unable to… In a simple test case with a small amount of the same code the overzealous truncation didn’t occur (I tired a very small resource bundle but still no dice)
The app I saw it in is quite a large code base (200+ classes) and using resourceBundles / locales in case it helps
On 1 Jun 2014, at 05:43, Alex Harui [via Apache Flex Users] <ml...@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
> Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> >I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at least by
> >setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an explicit
> >labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
> >
> >Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the excellently sharp
> >font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that was AIR
> >or Flex to thank for that)
> >
> >If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
> >
> >Cheers
> >Peter
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >View this message in context:
> >http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
> >x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
> >Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
> http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6714.html
> To unsubscribe from Overzealous truncation of mx labels, click here.
> NAML
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6715.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Can you create a JIRA bug with a simple test case?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 5/31/14 11:26 AM, "peetor" <mr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at least by
>setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an explicit
>labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
>
>Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the excellently sharp
>font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that was AIR
>or Flex to thank for that)
>
>If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
>
>Cheers
>Peter
>
>
>
>--
>View this message in context:
>http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-m
>x-labels-tp6710p6711.html
>Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Overzealous truncation of mx labels
Posted by peetor <mr...@gmail.com>.
I've worked around the issues I was seeing on my local machine at least by
setting truncateToFit to false on the labels, and setting an explicit
labelWidth on FormItems. Hardly ideal though!
Guessing this must be a bug which has come in due to the excellently sharp
font rendering thats made it's way in recently (don't know if that was AIR
or Flex to thank for that)
If anyones a better workaround would like to hear it
Cheers
Peter
--
View this message in context: http://apache-flex-users.2333346.n4.nabble.com/Overzealous-truncation-of-mx-labels-tp6710p6711.html
Sent from the Apache Flex Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.