You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "s1monw (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/01/31 06:49:32 UTC

[GitHub] [lucene] s1monw commented on issue #11428: Handle soft deletes via LiveDocsFormat [LUCENE-10392]

s1monw commented on issue #11428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/11428#issuecomment-1409852225

   The tomb-stoning ability is likely one of the major reasons why I used docvalues for this feature. The other was that it didn't require to change an existing format and it's API for it. We have always been conservative with changing stable and public APIs especially on that level unless there was a good reason for it. I can see the benefit of having a dedicated _soft-live format_ if we are willing to loose the tombstone ability (with a payload) since as @dnhatn pointed out correctly we would not have to write the DV on refresh for the soft deletes field. Yet, I doubt it makes a significant difference. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org