You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2007/09/23 22:04:55 UTC
"build definition used" on build result
A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
* is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is
in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
definition is later removed?)
* is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
* issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
Cheers,
Brett
--
Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Re: "build definition used" on build result
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
It's empty too
On 24/09/2007, at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Brett,
> you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too?
>
> If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the
> build is started.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> Brett Porter a écrit :
>> also when it is in progress
>> On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> olivier lamy a écrit :
>>>> Hi,
>>>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a
>>>> clone and add
>>>> of the buildDefinition).
>>>> * Yes it is in the email.
>>>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
>>>> update/checkout failed
>>>
>>> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be
>>> hidden in the build result.
>>>
>>> Emmanuel
>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Olivier
>>>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>>>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>>>>
>>>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to
>>>>> what is
>>>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>>>>> definition is later removed?)
>>>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>>>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>>>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>>>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Brett
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>>>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
--
Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Re: "build definition used" on build result
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
Brett,
you want to hide it when it is in progress or it is empty too?
If it is empty, it's a bug but I don't want to hide it when the build is started.
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
> also when it is in progress
>
> On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> olivier lamy a écrit :
>>> Hi,
>>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone
>>> and add
>>> of the buildDefinition).
>>> * Yes it is in the email.
>>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
>>> update/checkout failed
>>
>> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be
>> hidden in the build result.
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>> --
>>> Olivier
>>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>>>
>>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is
>>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>>>> definition is later removed?)
>>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Brett
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>>>
>>>>
>
> --
> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>
>
Re: "build definition used" on build result
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
also when it is in progress
On 24/09/2007, at 6:50 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
>
> olivier lamy a écrit :
>> Hi,
>> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a
>> clone and add
>> of the buildDefinition).
>> * Yes it is in the email.
>> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
>> update/checkout failed
>
> no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be
> hidden in the build result.
>
> Emmanuel
>
>> --
>> Olivier
>> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>>
>>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to
>>> what is
>>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>>> definition is later removed?)
>>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Brett
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>>
>>>
--
Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
Re: "build definition used" on build result
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
olivier lamy a écrit :
> Hi,
> * Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add
> of the buildDefinition).
> * Yes it is in the email.
> * It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
> update/checkout failed
no, if the build fails in checkout/update, the build def must be hidden in the build result.
Emmanuel
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> 2007/9/23, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>>
>> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is
>> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
>> definition is later removed?)
>> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
>> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
>> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
>> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Brett
>>
>> --
>> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
>> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>>
>>
>
>
Re: "build definition used" on build result
Posted by olivier lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
* Yes it's stored in the database with the buildResult (like a clone and add
of the buildDefinition).
* Yes it is in the email.
* It looks we have to store the buildDefinition even if the scm
update/checkout failed
--
Olivier
2007/9/23, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
>
> A couple of questions/issues on this new feature:
>
> * is this stored with the build result, or is it referring to what is
> in the database now? (ie, what happens to the result if the build
> definition is later removed?)
> * is it in the email template? (haven't looked yet)
> * issue: it shows up on builds that are in error as empty: http://
> maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
> buildId=23999&projectId=272&projectGroupId=8
>
> Cheers,
> Brett
>
> --
> Brett Porter - brett@apache.org
> Blog: http://www.devzuz.org/blogs/bporter/
>
>
--
Olivier