You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2006/02/20 21:50:47 UTC

Re: perceptron and over-scoring (Re: Over-scoring of SURBL lists... )

Theo Van Dinter writes:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
> > yes, I'm a little worried about that, too.
> So from these results, the FP rate is very low for SURBL (0.21%), and
> while there is a ton of overlap for spam (57.3%), there's very little
> for ham (0.01%).

aha, that's very interesting!

--j.

Re: perceptron and over-scoring (Re: Over-scoring of SURBL lists... )

Posted by Raymond Dijkxhoorn <ra...@prolocation.net>.

Hi!

>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 07:38:42PM +0000, Justin Mason wrote:

>>> yes, I'm a little worried about that, too.

>> So from these results, the FP rate is very low for SURBL (0.21%), and
>> while there is a ton of overlap for spam (57.3%), there's very little
>> for ham (0.01%).

> aha, that's very interesting!

And no surprise, we have been discussing this internally also and really 
see very few FP reports overlapping.

And please, if you DO get a FP, _report_ ! (whitelist@surbl.org)

Thanks!
Raymond.