You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tiles.apache.org by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org> on 2007/02/28 13:52:37 UTC
[RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
by all three votes.
+1 - David, Antonio, Greg
0 - n/a
-1 - n/a
I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
first step should be done shortly.
1) Move maven artifacts
2) Move binaries
3) Update website
4) Send announcement
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>
> Release notes:
>
> *
> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>
>
> Distribution:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a
> vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>
> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
doh! Sorry. . .oh well.
David
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I must have missed something. I see:
>>
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
>> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
>> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>>
>> but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
>> were in my local repo but not the public one?
>
> Yes, that's what I meant by my comment. You uploaded signatures for
> some files that are not in the Maven repo.
>
> No big deal... the extra signatures won't hurt anything. They've
> already synced to the central repo, probably best to just leave them
> alone now.
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> I must have missed something. I see:
>
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
> [TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
> 10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
>
> but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
> were in my local repo but not the public one?
Yes, that's what I meant by my comment. You uploaded signatures for
some files that are not in the Maven repo.
No big deal... the extra signatures won't hurt anything. They've
already synced to the central repo, probably best to just leave them
alone now.
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
I must have missed something. I see:
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.tar.gz.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-src.zip.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.tar.gz.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:37 10K
[TXT] tiles-core-2.0.1-bin.zip.asc
10-Mar-2007 10:34 186
but not their associated files. Shouldn't these be removed since they
were in my local repo but not the public one?
David
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
>
> Thanks! There are a few extras, actually-- the ones for the -bin and
> -src assemblies:
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.1/
>
>
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/10/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
Thanks! There are a few extras, actually-- the ones for the -bin and
-src assemblies:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/tiles/tiles-core/2.0.1/
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 3/7/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
>> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
>
> David, the files (jars and poms) in the Maven repo also need
> signatures. See:
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/README.txt
Done. I think I got them all, thanks for the double-check.
David
>
> At this point it's probably easiest to sign them in your local Maven
> repo and upload the signatures. There's a script that I used for a
> Struts release, here:
> http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Struts135ReleaseDiary#20060805
>
> For future releases, we can use maven-gpg-plugin.
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 3/7/07, David H. DeWolf <dd...@apache.org> wrote:
> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
David, the files (jars and poms) in the Maven repo also need
signatures. See:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/README.txt
At this point it's probably easiest to sign them in your local Maven
repo and upload the signatures. There's a script that I used for a
Struts release, here:
http://wiki.wsmoak.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Struts135ReleaseDiary#20060805
For future releases, we can use maven-gpg-plugin.
--
Wendy
Re: [STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
I have signed the distributions and moved them to the distribution
directory. Once synchronized, I will update the website. I'll be
working on some site enhancements until then.
Thanks for your patience. . .
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Team,
>
> I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
> in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
> or update the www. I probably won't have time to get to it until the
> weekend. If someone else wants to step in, please feel free, otherwise,
> I'll try to get it done asap.
>
>
> David
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> 2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
>> by all three votes.
>>
>> +1 - David, Antonio, Greg
>> 0 - n/a
>> -1 - n/a
>>
>>
>> I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
>> today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
>> first step should be done shortly.
>>
>> 1) Move maven artifacts
>> 2) Move binaries
>> 3) Update website
>> 4) Send announcement
>>
>> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>>> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>>>
>>> Release notes:
>>>
>>> *
>>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>>>
>>>
>>> Distribution:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>>>
>>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>>
>>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>>
>>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond
>>> with a vote on its quality:
>>>
>>> [ ] Leave at test build
>>> [ ] Alpha
>>> [ ] Beta
>>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>>
>>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by
>>> PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at
>>> least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>>
>>
>
[STATUS] [RESULTS] [VOTE] 2.0.1 Release Quality
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Team,
I've been under water at the day job for the past week. While 2.0.1 is
in the maven repo, I haven't been able to sign and move the binaries yet
or update the www. I probably won't have time to get to it until the
weekend. If someone else wants to step in, please feel free, otherwise,
I'll try to get it done asap.
David
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> 2.0.1 is our first official release. It has been deemed alpha quality
> by all three votes.
>
> +1 - David, Antonio, Greg
> 0 - n/a
> -1 - n/a
>
>
> I will work on getting the website updated and the release published
> today. I'll take things in this order over the next few days. The
> first step should be done shortly.
>
> 1) Move maven artifacts
> 2) Move binaries
> 3) Update website
> 4) Send announcement
>
> David H. DeWolf wrote:
>> The Tiles 2.0.1 test build has been available since February 19, 2007.
>>
>> Release notes:
>>
>> *
>> https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=21792&styleName=Text&projectId=10160&Create=Create
>>
>>
>> Distribution:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/
>>
>> Maven 2 staging repository:
>>
>> * http://people.apache.org/builds/tiles/2.0.1/m2-staging-repository/
>>
>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>> a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] General Availability (GA)
>>
>> Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC
>> members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least
>> three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s.
>>
>