You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mesos.apache.org by Jiang Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me> on 2013/05/31 01:10:44 UTC

Review Request: Changed reaper to use Future as the notification mechanism. The notification is now sent only if the pid is explicitly registered via the monitor() call.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/
-----------------------------------------------------------

Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.


Description
-------

Rebased against master. Previous review received "shipit"s but got lost.


Diffs
-----

  src/slave/cgroups_isolator.hpp 7b8270d0b0f94a71da12bc123d39b44c40c3f7ed 
  src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp 9b3a3a5dfec27a119fdd47a88f016e21470eb88d 
  src/slave/process_isolator.hpp 9875f4a6e8e109e31ad390fbd7a84d03ad747190 
  src/slave/process_isolator.cpp d4f7b7603452e7226189899aca7e3c94e537829f 
  src/slave/reaper.hpp 09844d8d47b143ee369e0c82b19d65a774df4a90 
  src/slave/reaper.cpp 1d826d1b5fe1048b03662a1e9d12b18371e5c88f 
  src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp fbb6066652c0f36c0a8fd9b0c4dac7e0240a5210 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/


Testing
-------

make check.


Thanks,

Jiang Yan Xu


Re: Review Request: Changed reaper to use Future as the notification mechanism. The notification is now sent only if the pid is explicitly registered via the monitor() call.

Posted by Jiang Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me>.

> On May 31, 2013, 5:13 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp, line 798
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/1/?file=299192#file299192line798>
> >
> >     s/status/status of " << pid << " /
> >     
> >     Also, can we pull this down so that we can also include the executor and framework ids?

Fixed in https://reviews.apache.org/r/11556/


> On May 31, 2013, 5:13 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp, line 802
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/1/?file=299192#file299192line802>
> >
> >     ditto

Fixed in https://reviews.apache.org/r/11556/


- Jiang Yan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#review21255
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 31, 2013, 6:43 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 31, 2013, 6:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Rebased against master. Previous review received "shipit"s but got lost.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolator.hpp 7b8270d0b0f94a71da12bc123d39b44c40c3f7ed 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp 9b3a3a5dfec27a119fdd47a88f016e21470eb88d 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.hpp 9875f4a6e8e109e31ad390fbd7a84d03ad747190 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.cpp d4f7b7603452e7226189899aca7e3c94e537829f 
>   src/slave/reaper.hpp 09844d8d47b143ee369e0c82b19d65a774df4a90 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp 1d826d1b5fe1048b03662a1e9d12b18371e5c88f 
>   src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp fbb6066652c0f36c0a8fd9b0c4dac7e0240a5210 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Changed reaper to use Future as the notification mechanism. The notification is now sent only if the pid is explicitly registered via the monitor() call.

Posted by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#review21255
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44125>

    s/status/status of " << pid << " /
    
    Also, can we pull this down so that we can also include the executor and framework ids?



src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44127>

    ditto



src/slave/reaper.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44129>

    s/a/our/



src/slave/reaper.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44130>

    s/, then/; /



src/slave/reaper.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44131>

    s/process statuses/processes first/



src/slave/reaper.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/#comment44132>

    great comments! 


- Vinod Kone


On May 30, 2013, 11:10 p.m., Jiang Yan Xu wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 30, 2013, 11:10 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Rebased against master. Previous review received "shipit"s but got lost.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolator.hpp 7b8270d0b0f94a71da12bc123d39b44c40c3f7ed 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp 9b3a3a5dfec27a119fdd47a88f016e21470eb88d 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.hpp 9875f4a6e8e109e31ad390fbd7a84d03ad747190 
>   src/slave/process_isolator.cpp d4f7b7603452e7226189899aca7e3c94e537829f 
>   src/slave/reaper.hpp 09844d8d47b143ee369e0c82b19d65a774df4a90 
>   src/slave/reaper.cpp 1d826d1b5fe1048b03662a1e9d12b18371e5c88f 
>   src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp fbb6066652c0f36c0a8fd9b0c4dac7e0240a5210 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jiang Yan Xu
> 
>


Re: Review Request: Changed reaper to use Future as the notification mechanism. The notification is now sent only if the pid is explicitly registered via the monitor() call.

Posted by Jiang Yan Xu <ya...@jxu.me>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/
-----------------------------------------------------------

(Updated May 31, 2013, 6:43 p.m.)


Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman, Vinod Kone, and Ben Mahler.


Changes
-------

Addressed Vinod's comments.


Description
-------

Rebased against master. Previous review received "shipit"s but got lost.


Diffs (updated)
-----

  src/slave/cgroups_isolator.hpp 7b8270d0b0f94a71da12bc123d39b44c40c3f7ed 
  src/slave/cgroups_isolator.cpp 9b3a3a5dfec27a119fdd47a88f016e21470eb88d 
  src/slave/process_isolator.hpp 9875f4a6e8e109e31ad390fbd7a84d03ad747190 
  src/slave/process_isolator.cpp d4f7b7603452e7226189899aca7e3c94e537829f 
  src/slave/reaper.hpp 09844d8d47b143ee369e0c82b19d65a774df4a90 
  src/slave/reaper.cpp 1d826d1b5fe1048b03662a1e9d12b18371e5c88f 
  src/tests/reaper_tests.cpp fbb6066652c0f36c0a8fd9b0c4dac7e0240a5210 

Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/11554/diff/


Testing
-------

make check.


Thanks,

Jiang Yan Xu