[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-9711) [FB] Package org.apache.ofbiz.entity.cache

["Dennis Balkir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Dennis Balkir created OFBIZ-9711:
------------------------------------

             Summary: [FB] Package org.apache.ofbiz.entity.cache
                 Key: OFBIZ-9711
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-9711
             Project: OFBiz
          Issue Type: Sub-task
          Components: framework
    Affects Versions: Trunk
            Reporter: Dennis Balkir
            Priority: Minor


- AbstractEntityConditionCache.java:68, RCN_REDUNDANT_NULLCHECK_OF_NONNULL_VALUE
RCN: Redundant nullcheck of model, which is known to be non-null in org.apache.ofbiz.entity.cache.AbstractEntityConditionCache.remove(GenericEntity)

This method contains a redundant check of a known non-null value against the constant null.

- AbstractEntityConditionCache.java:169, UCF_USELESS_CONTROL_FLOW
UCF: Useless control flow in org.apache.ofbiz.entity.cache.AbstractEntityConditionCache.storeHook(boolean, GenericEntity, GenericEntity)

This method contains a useless control flow statement, where control flow continues onto the same place regardless of whether or not the branch is taken. For example, this is caused by having an empty statement block for an if statement:

    if (argv.length == 0) {
    // TODO: handle this case
    }

- AbstractEntityConditionCache.java:183, UCF_USELESS_CONTROL_FLOW
UCF: Useless control flow in org.apache.ofbiz.entity.cache.AbstractEntityConditionCache.storeHook(String, boolean, List, List)

This method contains a useless control flow statement, where control flow continues onto the same place regardless of whether or not the branch is taken. For example, this is caused by having an empty statement block for an if statement:

    if (argv.length == 0) {
    // TODO: handle this case
    }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)