You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by Grzegorz Hałajko <gr...@linuxpolska.pl> on 2015/04/14 10:40:16 UTC
[PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Hi
I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
And this is my proposal:
https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
New feature will be
"mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
ServiceMix.
Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g drools6
with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
supported camel, spring and blueprint.
What do you think?
Regards
GH
--
Grzegorz Hałajko
gpg: 4096R/CCB9AB0A
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF0A21389CCB9AB0A>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Posted by Grzegorz Hałajko <gr...@linuxpolska.pl>.
>From My point of view, I talking about taking responsibility. It is
difficult to support the solution where environment configuration give wide
range of possibilities
ServiceMix it's bunch of libraries in some fixed version, not range of
versions. Because this everybody can find it in raw Karaf. So if We want
add drools to SM also We need using libs in versions that We choose in SM
releases.
I will add path to issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
thx
2015-04-14 14:10 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>:
> As long the drools feature has no dependency to ServiceMix it should work
> with the separate lifecycle. We have only to
> ensure, the drools feature doesn't force a fixed version of camel etc. It
> could be done using version ranges. Having
> separate features which don't depend on ServiceMix core makes it easier
> installable outside ServiceMix, e.g. Karaf. But
> it was only my thought for the future.
>
> Having the feature in ServiceMix code base gives us more flexibility. We
> can try to patch the drools karaf features.
> When we achieve the state which doesn't force the concrete Camel and CXF
> version there is no reason to maintain the
> fatures in ServiceMix.
>
> I think this proposal is ok.
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
> On 14.04.2015 13:33, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> > Nice. org.apache.servicemix.drools it will be better.
> >
> > So. My proposal
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/e48a3f21cd598a40b57aa329791bb1a7d79ef435
> >
> >
> > With separate repository will be difficult maintenance relation between
> SM
> > and features in that repository.
> > For example which project should be released earlier SM or
> > servicemix-features.
> >
> > drools-karaf-features have own lifecycle but without relation with SM.
> > Maybe it's better to do a patch to drools-karaf-features ?
> >
> >
> > 2015-04-14 11:23 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <
> krzys.sobkowiak@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Hi Grzegorz
> >>
> >>
> >> I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
> >>
> >> It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature
> >> (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
> >> and can be better extended with additional features.
> >>
> >> We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools
> >> (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
> >> submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this
> >> feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
> >>
> >> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
> >>
> >>
> >> We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this
> >> submodule in a separate repository (something
> >> like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
> >>
> >> We have already an issue for the new feature
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Krzysztof
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
> >>>
> >>> And this is my proposal:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
> >>> New feature will be
> >>>
> "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
> >>>
> >>> I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
> >>> versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
> >>> ServiceMix.
> >>>
> >>> Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g
> >> drools6
> >>> with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
> >>> supported camel, spring and blueprint.
> >>>
> >>> What do you think?
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> GH
> >>>
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
> >>
> >> JEE & OSS Architect
> >> Apache Software Foundation Member
> >> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> >> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
> >> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
>
--
Grzegorz Hałajko
gpg: 4096R/CCB9AB0A
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF0A21389CCB9AB0A>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
As long the drools feature has no dependency to ServiceMix it should work with the separate lifecycle. We have only to
ensure, the drools feature doesn't force a fixed version of camel etc. It could be done using version ranges. Having
separate features which don't depend on ServiceMix core makes it easier installable outside ServiceMix, e.g. Karaf. But
it was only my thought for the future.
Having the feature in ServiceMix code base gives us more flexibility. We can try to patch the drools karaf features.
When we achieve the state which doesn't force the concrete Camel and CXF version there is no reason to maintain the
fatures in ServiceMix.
I think this proposal is ok.
Regards
Krzysztof
On 14.04.2015 13:33, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> Nice. org.apache.servicemix.drools it will be better.
>
> So. My proposal
>
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/e48a3f21cd598a40b57aa329791bb1a7d79ef435
>
>
> With separate repository will be difficult maintenance relation between SM
> and features in that repository.
> For example which project should be released earlier SM or
> servicemix-features.
>
> drools-karaf-features have own lifecycle but without relation with SM.
> Maybe it's better to do a patch to drools-karaf-features ?
>
>
> 2015-04-14 11:23 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Grzegorz
>>
>>
>> I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
>>
>> It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature
>> (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
>> and can be better extended with additional features.
>>
>> We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools
>> (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
>> submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this
>> feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
>>
>> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
>>
>>
>> We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this
>> submodule in a separate repository (something
>> like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
>>
>> We have already an issue for the new feature
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Krzysztof
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
>>>
>>> And this is my proposal:
>>>
>>>
>> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
>>> New feature will be
>>> "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
>>>
>>> I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
>>> versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
>>> ServiceMix.
>>>
>>> Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g
>> drools6
>>> with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
>>> supported camel, spring and blueprint.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> GH
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>>
>> JEE & OSS Architect
>> Apache Software Foundation Member
>> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
>> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
>> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
>>
>
>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Posted by Grzegorz Hałajko <gr...@linuxpolska.pl>.
Nice. org.apache.servicemix.drools it will be better.
So. My proposal
https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/e48a3f21cd598a40b57aa329791bb1a7d79ef435
With separate repository will be difficult maintenance relation between SM
and features in that repository.
For example which project should be released earlier SM or
servicemix-features.
drools-karaf-features have own lifecycle but without relation with SM.
Maybe it's better to do a patch to drools-karaf-features ?
2015-04-14 11:23 GMT+02:00 Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Grzegorz
>
>
> I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
>
> It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature
> (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
> and can be better extended with additional features.
>
> We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools
> (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
> submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this
> feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
>
> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
>
>
> We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this
> submodule in a separate repository (something
> like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
>
> We have already an issue for the new feature
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
>
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
> >
> > And this is my proposal:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
> >
> > New feature will be
> > "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
> >
> > I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
> > versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
> > ServiceMix.
> >
> > Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g
> drools6
> > with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
> > supported camel, spring and blueprint.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Regards
> > GH
> >
> >
>
> --
> Krzysztof Sobkowiak
>
> JEE & OSS Architect
> Apache Software Foundation Member
> Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
> Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <
> http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>
>
--
Grzegorz Hałajko
tel: +48 784 488 241
gpg: 4096R/CCB9AB0A
<https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF0A21389CCB9AB0A>
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
On 04/14/2015 11:23 AM, Krzysztof Sobkowiak wrote:
> Hi Grzegorz
>
>
> I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
>
> It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
> and can be better extended with additional features.
>
> We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
> submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
>
> mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
>
>
> We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this submodule in a separate repository (something
> like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
>
> We have already an issue for the new feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
>
>
> Regards
> Krzysztof
>
>
>
> On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
>>
>> And this is my proposal:
>>
>> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
>>
>> New feature will be
>> "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
>>
>> I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
>> versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
>> ServiceMix.
>>
>> Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g drools6
>> with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
>> supported camel, spring and blueprint.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Regards
>> GH
>>
>>
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [PROPOSAL] Drools 6.2 i servicemix 6.0
Posted by Krzysztof Sobkowiak <kr...@gmail.com>.
Hi Grzegorz
I think, you mean ServiceMix 6.0.0.
It looks good for me. I prefer the modularized version of the feature (exactly like it looks now). It is more flexible
and can be better extended with additional features.
We can eventually create a new maven submodule drools (org.apache.servicemix/drools) in ServiceMix. It could contain a
submodule feature(org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature) containing this feature. Your feature would be accessible with ulr:
mvn:org.apache.servicemix.drools/feature/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/feature
We can think once (when haveng more such features) about extracting this submodule in a separate repository (something
like servicemix-features) with own lifecycle.
We have already an issue for the new feature https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SM-2497
Regards
Krzysztof
On 14.04.2015 10:40, Grzegorz Hałajko wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> I would like to add Drools 6.2 to SerwiceMix 6.2
>
> And this is my proposal:
>
> https://github.com/cybermaniax/servicemix/commit/00e0c8480e0d8f3f46f552e20c5bc44a52be8411
>
> New feature will be
> "mvn:org.apache.servicemix/apache-servicemix/6.0.0-SNAPSHOT/xml/drools6"
>
> I was inspired by drools-karaf-features but in my version I changed
> versions in external bundles (e.g. camel , cxf ) to supported in
> ServiceMix.
>
> Also I see another way to create features.xml. One big feature e.g drools6
> with all bundles (kie,drools,jbpm), from projekt and another three
> supported camel, spring and blueprint.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Regards
> GH
>
>
--
Krzysztof Sobkowiak
JEE & OSS Architect
Apache Software Foundation Member
Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer & PMC chair
Senior Solution Architect @ Capgemini SSC <http://www.pl.capgemini-sdm.com/en/>