You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@nifi.apache.org by Russell Bateman <ru...@perfectsearchcorp.com> on 2016/09/13 22:14:32 UTC

Processor to send flowfile to two different destinations?

/DuplicateFlowFile/ sends multiple copies all to the 
Successrelationship, mostly for testing load.

How does one legitimately send two copies of the same flowfile to 
different relationships to result essentially in two parallel workflows? 
(I'm probably missing some simple understanding here...)

Russ

Re: Processor to send flowfile to two different destinations?

Posted by Russell Bateman <ru...@perfectsearchcorp.com>.

Thanks, Andrew. I should have tried that first.

On 09/13/2016 04:19 PM, Andrew Grande wrote:
>
> It's actually very simple - connect a processor output to 2 or more 
> other processors or ports, use the 'success' relationship if prompted 
> to choose from multiple.
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016, 6:14 PM Russell Bateman 
> <russell.bateman@perfectsearchcorp.com 
> <ma...@perfectsearchcorp.com>> wrote:
>
>     /DuplicateFlowFile/ sends multiple copies all to the
>     Successrelationship, mostly for testing load.
>
>     How does one legitimately send two copies of the same flowfile to
>     different relationships to result essentially in two parallel
>     workflows? (I'm probably missing some simple understanding here...)
>
>     Russ
>

Re: Processor to send flowfile to two different destinations?

Posted by Andrew Grande <ap...@gmail.com>.

It's actually very simple - connect a processor output to 2 or more other
processors or ports, use the 'success' relationship if prompted to choose
from multiple.

Andrew

On Tue, Sep 13, 2016, 6:14 PM Russell Bateman <
russell.bateman@perfectsearchcorp.com> wrote:

> *DuplicateFlowFile* sends multiple copies all to the Success
> relationship, mostly for testing load.
>
> How does one legitimately send two copies of the same flowfile to
> different relationships to result essentially in two parallel workflows?
> (I'm probably missing some simple understanding here...)
>
> Russ
>