You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@openmeetings.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2020/04/20 16:42:57 UTC
[DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Hello All,
I would like to discuss the plans for next release
Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
What features are absolutely necessary?
p.s. be realistic please :)))
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 16:20, Konrad Schwarz <Ko...@familieschwarz.eu> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> i would ask for a "anonymous user".
>
> - i create a invitation Link
> - i send it to someone
> - if "someone" uses the link, he can enter a room without registration
>
> It would be fine to have a centralized parameter, how long a "anonymous
> invitation" is valid or this time is created while creating the
> invitation link ?
Invitation dialog has controls to set link validity period:
- one time
- from date - to date
- endless
select what is appropriate
(later on you can delete any invitation)
>
> Regards and thanks for developing.
>
> Koni
>
>
>
>
> Am 20.04.2020 um 18:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> > Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> > What features are absolutely necessary?
> >
> > p.s. be realistic please :)))
> >
>
>
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by Konrad Schwarz <Ko...@FamilieSchwarz.eu>.
Hi All,
i would ask for a "anonymous user".
- i create a invitation Link
- i send it to someone
- if "someone" uses the link, he can enter a room without registration
It would be fine to have a centralized parameter, how long a "anonymous
invitation" is valid or this time is created while creating the
invitation link ?
Regards and thanks for developing.
Koni
Am 20.04.2020 um 18:42 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> What features are absolutely necessary?
>
> p.s. be realistic please :)))
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de>.
Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um 09:27:21 Uhr:
> I thought this thread will be about new functionality
> Something bigger than bug fixing
>
> Maybe this is good indicator 5.0.0 is almost ready for production :)
>
> >> What does the "M" mean in the releases?
>
> M === Milestone
> Something that already is not Alpha or Beta but not yet Release :)
> so the question is: Can we remove this "Please NOTE: this version
> might be not production ready" from the main site?
I don't have 5.0.0 running on a CentOS 7 right now. But I'll take the
time this week to take it online. First have to be familiar how this works
with KMS. Then I can tell.
I have version 4,x running on an old openSUSE server and there it plays
nice.
Andreas
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
I thought this thread will be about new functionality
Something bigger than bug fixing
Maybe this is good indicator 5.0.0 is almost ready for production :)
>> What does the "M" mean in the releases?
M === Milestone
Something that already is not Alpha or Beta but not yet Release :)
so the question is: Can we remove this "Please NOTE: this version
might be not production ready" from the main site?
>> > > > I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into over
>> > > > the next 1-2 weeks.
>> > > >
>> > > > With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is in
>> > > > terms of testing.
>> > > > Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
>> > > > => Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And then
>> > > if
>> > > > a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
Mobile browsers is the must these days
I was hoping moving to Bootstrap will be very good first step to support mobiles
Unfortunately many "video windows" concept doesn't work well with bootstrap ...
(they are still jquery-ui dialogs ...)
>> > > >
>> > > > @Ratatouille:
>> > > > *Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
>> > > >
>> > > > *invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM wheresuggested
>> > > > to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
>> > > > => Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and not
>> > > > very hard to fix.
>> > >
>> > > A ticket is created at JIRA?
>> > >
>> > > Andreas
>> > >
>>
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
thx I assigned it to myself.
Sebastian Wagner
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianwagner/
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 08:58, ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de> wrote:
> Just did that.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2286
>
> Andreas
>
> "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um
> 08:45:51 Uhr:
>
> > Yeah please create it here:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OPENMEETINGS/
> >
> > And if you could reply with the ticket number and I am happy to look into
> > it.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Seb
> >
> > Sebastian Wagner
> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianwagner/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 08:33, ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um
> > > 08:24:41 Uhr:
> > >
> > > > I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into
> over
> > > > the next 1-2 weeks.
> > > >
> > > > With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is
> in
> > > > terms of testing.
> > > > Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
> > > > => Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And
> then
> > > if
> > > > a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
> > > >
> > > > @Ratatouille:
> > > > *Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
> > > >
> > > > *invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM
> wheresuggested
> > > > to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
> > > > => Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and
> not
> > > > very hard to fix.
> > >
> > > A ticket is created at JIRA?
> > >
> > > Andreas
> > >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de>.
Just did that.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2286
Andreas
"seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um 08:45:51 Uhr:
> Yeah please create it here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OPENMEETINGS/
>
> And if you could reply with the ticket number and I am happy to look into
> it.
>
> Cheers
> Seb
>
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianwagner/
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 08:33, ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de> wrote:
>
> > "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um
> > 08:24:41 Uhr:
> >
> > > I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into over
> > > the next 1-2 weeks.
> > >
> > > With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is in
> > > terms of testing.
> > > Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
> > > => Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And then
> > if
> > > a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
> > >
> > > @Ratatouille:
> > > *Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
> > >
> > > *invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM wheresuggested
> > > to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
> > > => Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and not
> > > very hard to fix.
> >
> > A ticket is created at JIRA?
> >
> > Andreas
> >
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Yeah please create it here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/OPENMEETINGS/
And if you could reply with the ticket number and I am happy to look into
it.
Cheers
Seb
Sebastian Wagner
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianwagner/
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 08:33, ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de> wrote:
> "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um
> 08:24:41 Uhr:
>
> > I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into over
> > the next 1-2 weeks.
> >
> > With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is in
> > terms of testing.
> > Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
> > => Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And then
> if
> > a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
> >
> > @Ratatouille:
> > *Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
> >
> > *invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM wheresuggested
> > to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
> > => Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and not
> > very hard to fix.
>
> A ticket is created at JIRA?
>
> Andreas
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de>.
"seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um 08:24:41 Uhr:
> I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into over
> the next 1-2 weeks.
>
> With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is in
> terms of testing.
> Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
> => Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And then if
> a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
>
> @Ratatouille:
> *Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
>
> *invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM wheresuggested
> to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
> => Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and not
> very hard to fix.
A ticket is created at JIRA?
Andreas
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
I logged some Jira tickets against recording I am keen to look into over
the next 1-2 weeks.
With support for Mobile (Android/iOS) I am not sure how ready it is in
terms of testing.
Or if Mobile browser support is even the goal of version 5.0.0
=> Do we have some sort of supported browser and OS versions ? And then if
a platform is not 100% supported you can mark it as beta for 5.0.0.
@Ratatouille:
*Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an*
*invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM wheresuggested
to her with their email addresses as recipient.*
=> Can you create a ticket for this. That seems a privacy issue and not
very hard to fix.
Cheers
Seb
Sebastian Wagner
https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastianwagner/
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 07:59, ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> What does the "M" mean in the releases?
>
> Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an
> invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM where
> suggested to her with their email addresses as recipient.
>
> Is it possible (maybe via ACL or userrights) to hide those suggestions
> for some users? I don't like the idea that a new user can see all
> existing accounts via email-address in OM.
>
> Andreas
>
> Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um 00:22:26
> Uhr:
>
> > Well,
> >
> > Currently being VOTEd release is 5.0.0-M4
> > So this discussion is about next one
> > Should it be "5.0.0-M5" or "5.0.0"
> >
> > And what is currently missing :)
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 00:11, <in...@bureau-de-poste.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Wonderful! I think we are ready. If there is a problem with recording
> - it looks to be a firewall issue - that is something different than the
> release. We already have all the features that are absolutely necessary and
> we really need a stable release. I suggest that any additional features,
> and cosmetic (appearance) isses be moved to a 5.1 future release.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Ed
> > >
> > > Quoting Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> > > Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> > > What features are absolutely necessary?
> > >
> > > p.s. be realistic please :)))
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best regards,Maxim
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by ratatouille <ra...@bitclusive.de>.
Hello!
What does the "M" mean in the releases?
Yesterday a friend of mine created a new account. When she sent an
invitation from within OM all users with an account in OM where
suggested to her with their email addresses as recipient.
Is it possible (maybe via ACL or userrights) to hide those suggestions
for some users? I don't like the idea that a new user can see all
existing accounts via email-address in OM.
Andreas
Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> schrieb am 21.04.20 um 00:22:26 Uhr:
> Well,
>
> Currently being VOTEd release is 5.0.0-M4
> So this discussion is about next one
> Should it be "5.0.0-M5" or "5.0.0"
>
> And what is currently missing :)
>
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 00:11, <in...@bureau-de-poste.net> wrote:
> >
> > Wonderful! I think we are ready. If there is a problem with recording - it looks to be a firewall issue - that is something different than the release. We already have all the features that are absolutely necessary and we really need a stable release. I suggest that any additional features, and cosmetic (appearance) isses be moved to a 5.1 future release.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > Quoting Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> > Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> > What features are absolutely necessary?
> >
> > p.s. be realistic please :)))
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,Maxim
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Well,
Currently being VOTEd release is 5.0.0-M4
So this discussion is about next one
Should it be "5.0.0-M5" or "5.0.0"
And what is currently missing :)
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 00:11, <in...@bureau-de-poste.net> wrote:
>
> Wonderful! I think we are ready. If there is a problem with recording - it looks to be a firewall issue - that is something different than the release. We already have all the features that are absolutely necessary and we really need a stable release. I suggest that any additional features, and cosmetic (appearance) isses be moved to a 5.1 future release.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
>
> Quoting Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> What features are absolutely necessary?
>
> p.s. be realistic please :)))
>
> --
> Best regards,Maxim
>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Maxim
Re: [DISCUSSION] Plans for the next release
Posted by in...@bureau-de-poste.net.
Wonderful! I think we are ready. If there is a problem with
recording - it looks to be a firewall issue - that is something
different than the release. We already have all the features that are
absolutely necessary and we really need a stable release. I suggest
that any additional features, and cosmetic (appearance) isses be moved
to a 5.1 future release.
Best regards,
Ed
Quoting Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> Hello All,
>
> I would like to discuss the plans for next release
> Can it be long waited "5.0.0 without M"?
> What features are absolutely necessary?
>
> p.s. be realistic please :)))
>
> --
> Best regards,Maxim