Cutting 4.10 release soon

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Hi folks,
as Charan merged new tests for the clusterwise ledger scrutiny I would like
to cut a new release and hopefully restart the timebased release schedule.

The only problem I must report before starting the procedure is that we are
still not able to merge the change with the upgrade of Zookeeper dependency
to 3.5.5.
It seems that we that upgrade integration tests never pass on ASF CI (they
pass locally on my machine)

There is also an open discussion about the behavior of the byte[] writer API

Thoughts?

Enrico

Re: Cutting 4.10 release soon

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

I am ready to start this work.

I am preparing the release notes, usually this activity takes most of the
time for me.

Meanwhile please help reviewing and merging pending patches that are worth
to be delivered in 4.10


Enrico

Il mer 14 ago 2019, 18:46 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

>
>
> Il mer 14 ago 2019, 14:49 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>>
>>
>> Il mer 14 ago 2019, 03:18 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:20 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi folks,
>>> > as Charan merged new tests for the clusterwise ledger scrutiny I would
>>> like
>>> > to cut a new release and hopefully restart the timebased release
>>> schedule.
>>> >
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > The only problem I must report before starting the procedure is that
>>> we are
>>> > still not able to merge the change with the upgrade of Zookeeper
>>> dependency
>>> > to 3.5.5.
>>> > It seems that we that upgrade integration tests never pass on ASF CI
>>> (they
>>> > pass locally on my machine)
>>> >
>>>
>>> Have you checked the logs on CI?
>>>
>>
>> Sure, they are mostly timeouts
>>
>
>
> @sijie if you could take a look...maybe there is something that me and
> Dennis are missing
>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > There is also an open discussion about the behavior of the byte[]
>>> writer
>>> > API
>>> >
>>>
>>> Does adding comments address the concern first? Because I don't see an
>>> easy
>>> way to make byte[] array reusable after a sync operation.
>>>
>>
>> I agree, I would like to at least add a javadoc
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > Enrico
>>> >
>>>
>>

Re: Cutting 4.10 release soon

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Il mer 14 ago 2019, 14:49 Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

>
>
> Il mer 14 ago 2019, 03:18 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:20 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi folks,
>> > as Charan merged new tests for the clusterwise ledger scrutiny I would
>> like
>> > to cut a new release and hopefully restart the timebased release
>> schedule.
>> >
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> >
>> > The only problem I must report before starting the procedure is that we
>> are
>> > still not able to merge the change with the upgrade of Zookeeper
>> dependency
>> > to 3.5.5.
>> > It seems that we that upgrade integration tests never pass on ASF CI
>> (they
>> > pass locally on my machine)
>> >
>>
>> Have you checked the logs on CI?
>>
>
> Sure, they are mostly timeouts
>


@sijie if you could take a look...maybe there is something that me and
Dennis are missing


>
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > There is also an open discussion about the behavior of the byte[] writer
>> > API
>> >
>>
>> Does adding comments address the concern first? Because I don't see an
>> easy
>> way to make byte[] array reusable after a sync operation.
>>
>
> I agree, I would like to at least add a javadoc
>
> Enrico
>
>
>> - Sijie
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Enrico
>> >
>>
>

Re: Cutting 4.10 release soon

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Il mer 14 ago 2019, 03:18 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:20 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi folks,
> > as Charan merged new tests for the clusterwise ledger scrutiny I would
> like
> > to cut a new release and hopefully restart the timebased release
> schedule.
> >
>
> +1
>
>
> >
> > The only problem I must report before starting the procedure is that we
> are
> > still not able to merge the change with the upgrade of Zookeeper
> dependency
> > to 3.5.5.
> > It seems that we that upgrade integration tests never pass on ASF CI
> (they
> > pass locally on my machine)
> >
>
> Have you checked the logs on CI?
>

Sure, they are mostly timeouts



>
>
> >
> > There is also an open discussion about the behavior of the byte[] writer
> > API
> >
>
> Does adding comments address the concern first? Because I don't see an easy
> way to make byte[] array reusable after a sync operation.
>

I agree, I would like to at least add a javadoc

Enrico


> - Sijie
>
>
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Enrico
> >
>

Re: Cutting 4.10 release soon

[Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 4:20 AM Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi folks,
> as Charan merged new tests for the clusterwise ledger scrutiny I would like
> to cut a new release and hopefully restart the timebased release schedule.
>

+1


>
> The only problem I must report before starting the procedure is that we are
> still not able to merge the change with the upgrade of Zookeeper dependency
> to 3.5.5.
> It seems that we that upgrade integration tests never pass on ASF CI (they
> pass locally on my machine)
>

Have you checked the logs on CI?



>
> There is also an open discussion about the behavior of the byte[] writer
> API
>

Does adding comments address the concern first? Because I don't see an easy
way to make byte[] array reusable after a sync operation.

- Sijie


>
> Thoughts?
>
> Enrico
>