[GitHub] [rocketmq] lyx2000 created a discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user lyx2000 created a discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

We are using RocketMQ 5.0, but we encountered some problems when using the proxy, we can't create topic, get consumer & producer connections etc. through the grpc interface provided by the proxy, which causes a lot of trouble for us to get RocketMQ state.  Now we can only get some of it through the old MQAdmin, but this is not in line with the 5.0 Proxy design. Does the community have any plans to improve the proxy in the future? 

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] drpmma added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user drpmma added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

The act of creating a topic is considered an internal cluster operation and can be fulfilled by the mqadmin tool. And the role of the proxy is more focused on exposing services
 
And getting the client connection is indeed necessary for the proxy because the connection info is stored in the proxy.


GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210#discussioncomment-5262343

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits edited a comment on the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user ShadowySpirits edited a comment on the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

> It seems very necessary. Is it already being done?

I notice someone has added GET_CONSUMER_CONNECTION_LIST request code support for proxy in #6296. 

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210#discussioncomment-5279090

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] socutes added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user socutes added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

It seems very necessary. Is it already being done?

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210#discussioncomment-5261755

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user ShadowySpirits added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

The introduction of admin API to the proxy is indeed necessary. PTAL @drpmma @xdkxlk 

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210#discussioncomment-5152988

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] ShadowySpirits added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

GitHub user ShadowySpirits added a comment to the discussion: Inquiry about enriching 5.0 Proxy features

> It seems very necessary. Is it already being done?

I notice someone has added GET_CONSUMER_CONNECTION_LIST request code support for proxy in #6269. 

GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/discussions/6210#discussioncomment-5279090

----
This is an automatically sent email for dev@rocketmq.apache.org.
To unsubscribe, please send an email to: dev-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org