You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jspwiki.apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2010/11/17 07:38:29 UTC
Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
of failing unit tests.
Given it's being labelled an alpha, I don't think unit tests should
block it; but I'm lazy :)
Two questions.
* Are there any other technical items blocking a 3.0.0-something release?
* On the unit tests, it would be a good idea imo to get the list of
broken ones posted in the JIRA issue. That tends to make the problem
more discrete and easier for people to work on. Does anyone have the
list?
Hen
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
That's much better than 50 :)
I've updated the JIRA issue.
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just ran the tests and posted the results here :
> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>
> there are 2 failing tests.
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
>
> 2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
>
>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
>> of failing unit tests.
>>
>> Given it's being labelled an alpha, I don't think unit tests should
>> block it; but I'm lazy :)
>>
>> Two questions.
>>
>> * Are there any other technical items blocking a 3.0.0-something release?
>> * On the unit tests, it would be a good idea imo to get the list of
>> broken ones posted in the JIRA issue. That tends to make the problem
>> more discrete and easier for people to work on. Does anyone have the
>> list?
>>
>> Hen
>>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
I just ran the tests and posted the results here :
http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
there are 2 failing tests.
regards,
Harry
2010/11/17 Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>
> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> of failing unit tests.
>
> Given it's being labelled an alpha, I don't think unit tests should
> block it; but I'm lazy :)
>
> Two questions.
>
> * Are there any other technical items blocking a 3.0.0-something release?
> * On the unit tests, it would be a good idea imo to get the list of
> broken ones posted in the JIRA issue. That tends to make the problem
> more discrete and easier for people to work on. Does anyone have the
> list?
>
> Hen
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
I tend to agree with Dave here on the principle. Unfortunately, svn is really lousy at working with branches, but using Git makes this kind of a development approach extremely beneficial for everyone.
(Hint: JSPWiki is available at GitHub as well: https://github.com/apache/jspwiki. While svn is the authoritative source [and is the source of this Git repo], a great way to contribute is to clone the git repo, make your own feature branch and then attach the patches to the JIRA [to make sure the legal ticks are placed in the corresponding legal boxes.] On a personal level, I've already switched to Git everywhere I can, including JSPWiki development. I just commit to the SVN repo, that's all. The ability to maintain personal branches and local commits is just the killer feature for me.)
/Janne
On Mar 12, 2011, at 17:46 , Dave Wolf wrote:
> @Florian: There may be different "projects" (feature additions), but unless
> something truely remarkable (tragic?) happens they would always be added
> back into first the targeted release branch and then after release to
> production into the trunk.
>
> In some ways, the trunk becomes somewhat useless and as it only serves as a
> point for branching and merging back later. We also have a CM team who do
> the merging of the release branch back into the trunk when the branch goes
> into production. Then we create a new release branch for the next release
> and development begins anew. The main thread of development flows through
> the release and related "feature" branches.
>
> Really, the only advantage that I see with this model is the explicit
> knowledge that if you're working on a specific version's functionality,
> you'll be using either the release branch or a feature branch off of the
> release branch; rather than the implicit use of the trunk for the current
> development release.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> @Janne: I think these are two different topics that shouldn't be mixed up.
>> Seems what's lacking are things like a road map, documentation and more or
>> less clear development tasks for new contributors. That way it would be
>> easier for people to join the project. So far, the development process has
>> been working because the "big" contributors were able to do major parts on
>> their own. That has changed, and that's the reason why the development
>> process has been slowing down IMO. The code base is not that small anymore,
>> so it's quite hard for a newbie to continue working on bigger points someone
>> else has begun.
>>
>> @Dave: Thanks for clarifying that different way of repository management.
>> However, I guess the way the code is used was different in your projects:
>> I assume you had a code base and several projects using it. Each project
>> has its own modifications and extensions, based on project specific
>> requirements. In the end, you can have a look at them and judge what is
>> worth merging with the trunk, i.e. what is assumed to be valuable for future
>> projects.
>> Is that correct?
>>
>> Regards
>> Florian
>>
>>
>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <ja...@ecyrd.com>
>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> CC: "Harry Metske" <ha...@gmail.com>
>> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2011 23:56:49
>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>
>>
>> Well, based on the amount of commits I would say that the current
>> development process doesn't work :-/.
>>
>> That's why I don't really care - if you're willing to do the work, branch
>> all you want! :-D
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On Mar 11, 2011, at 15:32 , Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> @Janne: I was simply answering Florian's question as to my reasoning for
>> the
>>> development trunk. Obviously, the current develop process works and so we
>>> shouldn't change it and I do agree with you regarding the merging,
>>> definitively a PITA.
>>>
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated
>>>> build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA,
>>>> which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong
>> focus
>>>> on
>>>>> what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains
>> the
>>>>> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
>>>>> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will
>>>> work.
>>>>> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've
>>>> only
>>>>> performed our development work in release / functionality specific
>>>> branches.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. &
>>>> saved-tests/WebContent/...
>>>>> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>>> that
>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still
>> keep
>>>> it
>>>>>> in the trunk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>>>>>> supported
>>>>>>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will
>> be
>>>>>>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>>>>>> reduce
>>>>>>> the scope when debugging.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
>>>> the
>>>>>>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>> H: 303-377-9537
>>>>>>> M: 303-956-9106
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> life
>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <
>> harry.metske@gmail.com
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the
>> first
>>>>>>>> one).
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>>>>>> wysiwyg
>>>>>>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>>>>>>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> willing to give some support on it.
>>>>>>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>>>>>> ignored
>>>>>>>> it).
>>>>>>>> I did run the unit tests:
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>>>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line
>> 51:
>>>>>>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>>>>>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>>>>>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in
>> TemplateManager
>>>>>>>> (nor
>>>>>>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>>>>>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>>>>>>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>>>>>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>>>>>> branch
>>>>>>>>> tho.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've
>> fixed
>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>>>>>>>> happens
>>>>>>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
>>>> war
>>>>>>>>>> file,
>>>>>>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
>>>> JSPWiki
>>>>>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of
>>>> 1029
>>>>>>>>>> tests).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
>>>> several
>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
>>>> reference
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
>> a
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen"
>> <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>>>>>>>> work
>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8
>> branch
>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>>>>>>>> instead.
>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report
>> attached
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>>>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0
>> alpha
>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
>> for
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>>>>>>>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>>>>>>>> Seems
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>>>>>>>> Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be
>> ready
>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
>>>> quite
>>>>>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a
>>>> top
>>>>>>>>>> level
>>>>>>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface
>> (JSR-170),
>>>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
>>>> have
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
>>>> years)
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time
>> to
>>>>>>>>>> devote
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
>> for
>>>> a
>>>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
>>>> blocking
>>>>>>>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA)
>>>> is
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>>>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing
>> heavily
>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>>>>>>>> process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if
>> they
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>>>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>>>>>>>> contribute
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
@Florian: There may be different "projects" (feature additions), but unless
something truely remarkable (tragic?) happens they would always be added
back into first the targeted release branch and then after release to
production into the trunk.
In some ways, the trunk becomes somewhat useless and as it only serves as a
point for branching and merging back later. We also have a CM team who do
the merging of the release branch back into the trunk when the branch goes
into production. Then we create a new release branch for the next release
and development begins anew. The main thread of development flows through
the release and related "feature" branches.
Really, the only advantage that I see with this model is the explicit
knowledge that if you're working on a specific version's functionality,
you'll be using either the release branch or a feature branch off of the
release branch; rather than the implicit use of the trunk for the current
development release.
Cheers,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> @Janne: I think these are two different topics that shouldn't be mixed up.
> Seems what's lacking are things like a road map, documentation and more or
> less clear development tasks for new contributors. That way it would be
> easier for people to join the project. So far, the development process has
> been working because the "big" contributors were able to do major parts on
> their own. That has changed, and that's the reason why the development
> process has been slowing down IMO. The code base is not that small anymore,
> so it's quite hard for a newbie to continue working on bigger points someone
> else has begun.
>
> @Dave: Thanks for clarifying that different way of repository management.
> However, I guess the way the code is used was different in your projects:
> I assume you had a code base and several projects using it. Each project
> has its own modifications and extensions, based on project specific
> requirements. In the end, you can have a look at them and judge what is
> worth merging with the trunk, i.e. what is assumed to be valuable for future
> projects.
> Is that correct?
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <ja...@ecyrd.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> CC: "Harry Metske" <ha...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2011 23:56:49
> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>
>
> Well, based on the amount of commits I would say that the current
> development process doesn't work :-/.
>
> That's why I don't really care - if you're willing to do the work, branch
> all you want! :-D
>
> /Janne
>
> On Mar 11, 2011, at 15:32 , Dave Wolf wrote:
>
> > @Janne: I was simply answering Florian's question as to my reasoning for
> the
> > development trunk. Obviously, the current develop process works and so we
> > shouldn't change it and I do agree with you regarding the merging,
> > definitively a PITA.
> >
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated
> >> build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA,
> >> which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
> >>
> >> /Janne
> >>
> >> On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong
> focus
> >> on
> >>> what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains
> the
> >>> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
> >>> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will
> >> work.
> >>> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've
> >> only
> >>> performed our development work in release / functionality specific
> >> branches.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. &
> >> saved-tests/WebContent/...
> >>> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave Wolf
> >>>
> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >> that
> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still
> keep
> >> it
> >>>> in the trunk.
> >>>>
> >>>> /Janne
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
> >>>> supported
> >>>>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will
> be
> >>>>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
> >>>> reduce
> >>>>> the scope when debugging.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
> >> the
> >>>>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>> H: 303-377-9537
> >>>>> M: 303-956-9106
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> >>>> that
> >>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <
> harry.metske@gmail.com
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Dave,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the
> first
> >>>>>> one).
> >>>>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
> >>>> wysiwyg
> >>>>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
> >>>>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone
> >> is
> >>>>>> willing to give some support on it.
> >>>>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
> >>>> ignored
> >>>>>> it).
> >>>>>> I did run the unit tests:
> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>> Harry
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> >>>>>>> possible
> >>>>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
> >>>>>> certainly
> >>>>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line
> 51:
> >>>>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> >>>>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> >>>>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in
> TemplateManager
> >>>>>> (nor
> >>>>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> >>>>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
> >>>>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> >>>>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
> >>>> branch
> >>>>>>> tho.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've
> fixed
> >>>> for
> >>>>>> my
> >>>>>>> environment.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> >> life
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> >>>>>>> happens
> >>>>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Dave,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> >>>>>>> specific
> >>>>>>>> ?
> >>>>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
> >> war
> >>>>>>>> file,
> >>>>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
> >> JSPWiki
> >>>>>>>> URL.
> >>>>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of
> >> 1029
> >>>>>>>> tests).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Harry
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
> >> several
> >>>>>>>> build
> >>>>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
> >> reference
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> is out of date.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
> a
> >>>>>>> life
> >>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> Mandela
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
> >>>>>> florian@holeczek.de
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen"
> <
> >>>>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
> >>>>>> work
> >>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8
> branch
> >> --
> >>>>>>>> looks
> >>>>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
> >>>>>> instead.
> >>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report
> attached
> >> to
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
> >> with
> >>>>>>> 2.8.
> >>>>>>>>>> code
> >>>>>>>>>>> base.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
> >>>>>> seems
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0
> alpha
> >>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
> for
> >> a
> >>>>>>> life
> >>>>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> >>>>>>> Mandela
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> >>>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
> >>>>>> Seems
> >>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
> >>>>>> Janne
> >>>>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be
> ready
> >> to
> >>>>>>> try
> >>>>>>>>>> ;)
> >>>>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
> >> quite
> >>>>>>>> good.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a
> >> top
> >>>>>>>> level
> >>>>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> >>>>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> >>>>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface
> (JSR-170),
> >>>>>>> mainly
> >>>>>>>>>>> done by Janne
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
> >> have
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> look
> >>>>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
> >> code
> >>>>>>>> base.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
> >> years)
> >>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time
> to
> >>>>>>>> devote
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling
> for
> >> a
> >>>>>>> life
> >>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> Mandela
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> >>>>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
> >> blocking
> >>>>>>> TLP
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA)
> >> is
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> set
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
> >>>>>> believe
> >>>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing
> heavily
> >> on
> >>>>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
> >>>>>> process?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if
> they
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> >>>>>>> people
> >>>>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> >>>>>> contribute
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> codebase.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
Hi all,
@Janne: I think these are two different topics that shouldn't be mixed up. Seems what's lacking are things like a road map, documentation and more or less clear development tasks for new contributors. That way it would be easier for people to join the project. So far, the development process has been working because the "big" contributors were able to do major parts on their own. That has changed, and that's the reason why the development process has been slowing down IMO. The code base is not that small anymore, so it's quite hard for a newbie to continue working on bigger points someone else has begun.
@Dave: Thanks for clarifying that different way of repository management. However, I guess the way the code is used was different in your projects:
I assume you had a code base and several projects using it. Each project has its own modifications and extensions, based on project specific requirements. In the end, you can have a look at them and judge what is worth merging with the trunk, i.e. what is assumed to be valuable for future projects.
Is that correct?
Regards
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Janne Jalkanen" <ja...@ecyrd.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: "Harry Metske" <ha...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 11. März 2011 23:56:49
Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Well, based on the amount of commits I would say that the current development process doesn't work :-/.
That's why I don't really care - if you're willing to do the work, branch all you want! :-D
/Janne
On Mar 11, 2011, at 15:32 , Dave Wolf wrote:
> @Janne: I was simply answering Florian's question as to my reasoning for the
> development trunk. Obviously, the current develop process works and so we
> shouldn't change it and I do agree with you regarding the merging,
> definitively a PITA.
>
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated
>> build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA,
>> which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus
>> on
>>> what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
>>> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
>>> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will
>> work.
>>> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've
>> only
>>> performed our development work in release / functionality specific
>> branches.
>>>
>>>
>>> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. &
>> saved-tests/WebContent/...
>>> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep
>> it
>>>> in the trunk.
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>>
>>>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>>>> supported
>>>>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
>>>>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>>>> reduce
>>>>> the scope when debugging.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
>> the
>>>>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>> H: 303-377-9537
>>>>> M: 303-956-9106
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>>> that
>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>>>>>> one).
>>>>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>>>> wysiwyg
>>>>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>>>>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone
>> is
>>>>>> willing to give some support on it.
>>>>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>>>> ignored
>>>>>> it).
>>>>>> I did run the unit tests:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>>>>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>>>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>>>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>>>>>> (nor
>>>>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>>>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>>>>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>>>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>>>> branch
>>>>>>> tho.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
>>>> for
>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> life
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>>>>>> happens
>>>>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
>> war
>>>>>>>> file,
>>>>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
>> JSPWiki
>>>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of
>> 1029
>>>>>>>> tests).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
>> several
>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
>> reference
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>>>>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch
>> --
>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>>>>>> instead.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached
>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
>> with
>>>>>>> 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
>> a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>>>>>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>>>>>> Seems
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>>>>>> Janne
>>>>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready
>> to
>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
>> quite
>>>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a
>> top
>>>>>>>> level
>>>>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
>> have
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
>> code
>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
>> years)
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
>>>>>>>> devote
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
>> a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
>> blocking
>>>>>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA)
>> is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily
>> on
>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>>>>>> process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>>>>>> contribute
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Well, based on the amount of commits I would say that the current development process doesn't work :-/.
That's why I don't really care - if you're willing to do the work, branch all you want! :-D
/Janne
On Mar 11, 2011, at 15:32 , Dave Wolf wrote:
> @Janne: I was simply answering Florian's question as to my reasoning for the
> development trunk. Obviously, the current develop process works and so we
> shouldn't change it and I do agree with you regarding the merging,
> definitively a PITA.
>
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated
>> build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA,
>> which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus
>> on
>>> what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
>>> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
>>> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will
>> work.
>>> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've
>> only
>>> performed our development work in release / functionality specific
>> branches.
>>>
>>>
>>> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. &
>> saved-tests/WebContent/...
>>> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep
>> it
>>>> in the trunk.
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>>
>>>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>>>> supported
>>>>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
>>>>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>>>> reduce
>>>>> the scope when debugging.
>>>>>
>>>>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
>> the
>>>>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>> H: 303-377-9537
>>>>> M: 303-956-9106
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>>> that
>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>>>>>> one).
>>>>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>>>> wysiwyg
>>>>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>>>>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone
>> is
>>>>>> willing to give some support on it.
>>>>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>>>> ignored
>>>>>> it).
>>>>>> I did run the unit tests:
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>>>>>> certainly
>>>>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>>>>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>>>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>>>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>>>>>> (nor
>>>>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>>>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>>>>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>>>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>>>> branch
>>>>>>> tho.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
>>>> for
>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> environment.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> life
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>>>>>> happens
>>>>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>>>>>> specific
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
>> war
>>>>>>>> file,
>>>>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
>> JSPWiki
>>>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of
>> 1029
>>>>>>>> tests).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
>> several
>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
>> reference
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>>>>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>>>>>> work
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch
>> --
>>>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>>>>>> instead.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached
>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
>> with
>>>>>>> 2.8.
>>>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>>>>>> seems
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
>> a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>>>>>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>>>>>> Seems
>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>>>>>> Janne
>>>>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready
>> to
>>>>>>> try
>>>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
>> quite
>>>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a
>> top
>>>>>>>> level
>>>>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>>>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
>> have
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
>> code
>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
>> years)
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
>>>>>>>> devote
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
>> a
>>>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
>> blocking
>>>>>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA)
>> is
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>>>>>> believe
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily
>> on
>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>>>>>> process?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
>>>>>> have
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>>>>>>> people
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>>>>>> contribute
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
@Janne: I was simply answering Florian's question as to my reasoning for the
development trunk. Obviously, the current develop process works and so we
shouldn't change it and I do agree with you regarding the merging,
definitively a PITA.
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated
> build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA,
> which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
>
> /Janne
>
> On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
>
> > @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus
> on
> > what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
> > overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
> > appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will
> work.
> > In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've
> only
> > performed our development work in release / functionality specific
> branches.
> >
> >
> > @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. &
> saved-tests/WebContent/...
> > directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <
> janne.jalkanen@ecyrd.com>wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep
> it
> >> in the trunk.
> >>
> >> /Janne
> >>
> >> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
> >> supported
> >>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
> >>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
> >> reduce
> >>> the scope when debugging.
> >>>
> >>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
> the
> >>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave Wolf
> >>> H: 303-377-9537
> >>> M: 303-956-9106
> >>>
> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >> that
> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Dave,
> >>>>
> >>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
> >>>> one).
> >>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
> >> wysiwyg
> >>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
> >>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone
> is
> >>>> willing to give some support on it.
> >>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
> >>>>
> >>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
> >> ignored
> >>>> it).
> >>>> I did run the unit tests:
> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
> >>>>
> >>>> regards,
> >>>> Harry
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> >>>>> possible
> >>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
> >>>> certainly
> >>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
> >>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> >>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> >>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
> >>>> (nor
> >>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> >>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
> >>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> >>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
> >> branch
> >>>>> tho.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
> >> for
> >>>> my
> >>>>> environment.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> >> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> >>>>> happens
> >>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dave,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> >>>>> specific
> >>>>>> ?
> >>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
> war
> >>>>>> file,
> >>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
> JSPWiki
> >>>>>> URL.
> >>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of
> 1029
> >>>>>> tests).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> regards,
> >>>>>>> Harry
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
> several
> >>>>>> build
> >>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
> reference
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>> is out of date.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> >>>>> life
> >>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
> >>>> florian@holeczek.de
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> >>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> >>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> >>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
> >>>> work
> >>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch
> --
> >>>>>> looks
> >>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
> >>>> instead.
> >>>>> I
> >>>>>>>> also
> >>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached
> to
> >>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match
> with
> >>>>> 2.8.
> >>>>>>>> code
> >>>>>>>>> base.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
> >>>> seems
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> >>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
> a
> >>>>> life
> >>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> >>>>> Mandela
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> >>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
> >>>> Seems
> >>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>> if
> >>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
> >>>> Janne
> >>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready
> to
> >>>>> try
> >>>>>>>> ;)
> >>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be
> quite
> >>>>>> good.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a
> top
> >>>>>> level
> >>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> >>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> >>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> >>>>> mainly
> >>>>>>>>> done by Janne
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
> have
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>>> look
> >>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> >>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> >>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> >>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
> code
> >>>>>> base.
> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
> years)
> >>>>> and
> >>>>>> I
> >>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> >>>>>> devote
> >>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for
> a
> >>>>> life
> >>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> >>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
> blocking
> >>>>> TLP
> >>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA)
> is
> >>>> a
> >>>>>>>> set
> >>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
> >>>> believe
> >>>>>> all
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily
> on
> >>>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
> >>>> process?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
> >>>> have
> >>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> >>>>> people
> >>>>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> >>>> contribute
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> codebase.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>.
If you really want, go ahead, - but be aware that all of our automated build systems assume trunk. Also, merging stuff with svn is a real PITA, which is why I'd like to avoid the creation of new branches.
/Janne
On 11 Mar 2011, at 07:03, Dave Wolf wrote:
> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus on
> what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will work.
> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've only
> performed our development work in release / functionality specific branches.
>
>
> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. & saved-tests/WebContent/...
> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep it
>> in the trunk.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>> supported
>>> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
>>> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>> reduce
>>> the scope when debugging.
>>>
>>> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
>>> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>> H: 303-377-9537
>>> M: 303-956-9106
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave,
>>>>
>>>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>>>> one).
>>>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>> wysiwyg
>>>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>>>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
>>>> willing to give some support on it.
>>>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>>>>
>>>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>> ignored
>>>> it).
>>>> I did run the unit tests:
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>>>>
>>>> regards,
>>>> Harry
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>>>> possible
>>>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>>>> certainly
>>>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>>>>
>>>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>>>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>>>> (nor
>>>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>>>>
>>>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>>>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>> branch
>>>>> tho.
>>>>>
>>>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
>> for
>>>> my
>>>>> environment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>
>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>>>> that
>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>>>> happens
>>>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>>>> specific
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
>>>>>> file,
>>>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
>>>>>> tests).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Harry
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
>>>>> to
>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>>> life
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>>>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>>>> work
>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
>>>>>> looks
>>>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>>>> instead.
>>>>> I
>>>>>>>> also
>>>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
>>>>> 2.8.
>>>>>>>> code
>>>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>>>> seems
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>>>> Mandela
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>>>> Seems
>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> if
>>>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>>>> Janne
>>>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
>>>>> try
>>>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
>>>>>> good.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
>>>>>> level
>>>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>>>>> mainly
>>>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have
>>>> a
>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
>>>>> and
>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
>>>>>> devote
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>>>> life
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
>>>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
>>>> a
>>>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>>>> believe
>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>>>> process?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
>>>> have
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>>>>> people
>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>>>> contribute
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
D'oh... Janne, make that "shall I create a patch with the proposed saved-src
directories". :-)
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus
> on what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
> overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
> appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will work.
> In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've only
> performed our development work in release / functionality specific branches.
>
>
> @Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. & saved-tests/WebContent/...
> directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
>
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep it
>> in the trunk.
>>
>> /Janne
>>
>> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
>> supported
>> > part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
>> > easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
>> reduce
>> > the scope when debugging.
>> >
>> > Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to
>> the
>> > truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Dave Wolf
>> > H: <303-377-9537>303-377-9537
>> > M: <303-956-9106>303-956-9106
>> >
>> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dave,
>> >>
>> >> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>> >> one).
>> >> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
>> wysiwyg
>> >> editor that were not resolved yet.
>> >> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
>> >> willing to give some support on it.
>> >> JSPWiki can work without it.
>> >>
>> >> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
>> ignored
>> >> it).
>> >> I did run the unit tests:
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>> >>
>> >> regards,
>> >> Harry
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>> >>> possible
>> >>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>> >> certainly
>> >>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>> >>>
>> >>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>> >>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>> >>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>> >>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>> >> (nor
>> >>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>> >>>
>> >>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>> >>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>> >> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>> >>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
>> branch
>> >>> tho.
>> >>>
>> >>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
>> for
>> >> my
>> >>> environment.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>
>> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> life
>> >>> that
>> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>> >>> happens
>> >>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> /Janne
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Dave,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>> >>> specific
>> >>>> ?
>> >>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper
>> war
>> >>>> file,
>> >>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the
>> JSPWiki
>> >>>> URL.
>> >>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
>> >>>> tests).
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> regards,
>> >>>>> Harry
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were
>> several
>> >>>> build
>> >>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the
>> reference
>> >>> to
>> >>>> it
>> >>>>>> is out of date.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>> that
>> >>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>> >> florian@holeczek.de
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> Florian
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>> >>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>> >> work
>> >>> on
>> >>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch
>> --
>> >>>> looks
>> >>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>> >> instead.
>> >>> I
>> >>>>>> also
>> >>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached
>> to
>> >>> the
>> >>>>>> JIRA
>> >>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
>> >>> 2.8.
>> >>>>>> code
>> >>>>>>> base.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>> >> seems
>> >>>> from
>> >>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>> >>>>>> release.
>> >>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>> >>> Mandela
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>> >>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>> >>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>> >> Seems
>> >>>> as
>> >>>>>> if
>> >>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>> >> Janne
>> >>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready
>> to
>> >>> try
>> >>>>>> ;)
>> >>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
>> >>>> good.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
>> >>>> level
>> >>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>> >>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>> >>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>> >>> mainly
>> >>>>>>> done by Janne
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and
>> have
>> >> a
>> >>>>>> look
>> >>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards
>> >>>>>>> Florian
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the
>> code
>> >>>> base.
>> >>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er
>> years)
>> >>> and
>> >>>> I
>> >>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
>> >>>> devote
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> Regards,
>> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>> >>> life
>> >>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>> >>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing
>> blocking
>> >>> TLP
>> >>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
>> >> a
>> >>>>>> set
>> >>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>> >> believe
>> >>>> all
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily
>> on
>> >>>>>> their
>> >>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>> >> process?
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
>> >> have
>> >>> a
>> >>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>> >>> people
>> >>>>>> who
>> >>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>> >> contribute
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> codebase.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> /Janne
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
@Florian: Having a branch for development work really puts a strong focus on
what will be included in the associated release and the trunk remains the
overall code repository. At the end of the release, tags are created as
appropriate and the branch is merged into the trunk. Either way will work.
In the organizations where I've worked over the past few years, we've only
performed our development work in release / functionality specific branches.
@Janne: Shall I create saved-src/WebContent/.. & saved-tests/WebContent/...
directories for the two JSPs (FCK.jsp & TestMigratorForm.jsp)?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep it
> in the trunk.
>
> /Janne
>
> On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
>
> > Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the
> supported
> > part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
> > easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might
> reduce
> > the scope when debugging.
> >
> > Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
> > truck after 3.0 is working and out?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave Wolf
> > H: 303-377-9537
> > M: 303-956-9106
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <harry.metske@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Dave,
> >>
> >> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
> >> one).
> >> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a
> wysiwyg
> >> editor that were not resolved yet.
> >> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
> >> willing to give some support on it.
> >> JSPWiki can work without it.
> >>
> >> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have
> ignored
> >> it).
> >> I did run the unit tests:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Harry
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> >>> possible
> >>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
> >> certainly
> >>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
> >>>
> >>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
> >>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> >>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> >>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
> >> (nor
> >>> its parent: ModuleManager).
> >>>
> >>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> >>> It is referencing a non-existent page
> >> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> >>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8
> branch
> >>> tho.
> >>>
> >>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed
> for
> >> my
> >>> environment.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Dave Wolf
> >>>
> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >>> that
> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <
> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> >>> happens
> >>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
> >>>>
> >>>> /Janne
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Dave,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> >>> specific
> >>>> ?
> >>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
> >>>> file,
> >>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
> >>>> URL.
> >>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
> >>>> tests).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> regards,
> >>>>> Harry
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> >>>> build
> >>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
> >>> to
> >>>> it
> >>>>>> is out of date.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> >>> life
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
> >> florian@holeczek.de
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Dave,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> >>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hey Florian,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
> >> work
> >>> on
> >>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> >>>> looks
> >>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
> >> instead.
> >>> I
> >>>>>> also
> >>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
> >>> the
> >>>>>> JIRA
> >>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
> >>> 2.8.
> >>>>>> code
> >>>>>>> base.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
> >> seems
> >>>> from
> >>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> >>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> >>> life
> >>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> >>> Mandela
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> >>>> florian@holeczek.de>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
> >> Seems
> >>>> as
> >>>>>> if
> >>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
> >> Janne
> >>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
> >>> try
> >>>>>> ;)
> >>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> >>>> good.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> >>>> level
> >>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> >>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> >>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> >>> mainly
> >>>>>>> done by Janne
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have
> >> a
> >>>>>> look
> >>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards
> >>>>>>> Florian
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> >>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> >>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> >>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> >>>> base.
> >>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
> >>> and
> >>>> I
> >>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> >>>> devote
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Dave Wolf
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> >>> life
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> >>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> >>> TLP
> >>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
> >> a
> >>>>>> set
> >>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
> >> believe
> >>>> all
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> >>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
> >> process?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
> >> have
> >>> a
> >>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> >>> people
> >>>>>> who
> >>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> >> contribute
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> codebase.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> /Janne
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Sure, the more stuff we can get rid off the better. But I'd still keep it in the trunk.
/Janne
On 9 Mar 2011, at 16:04, Dave Wolf wrote:
> Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the supported
> part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
> easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might reduce
> the scope when debugging.
>
> Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
> truck after 3.0 is working and out?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
> H: 303-377-9537
> M: 303-956-9106
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
>> one).
>> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a wysiwyg
>> editor that were not resolved yet.
>> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
>> willing to give some support on it.
>> JSPWiki can work without it.
>>
>> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have ignored
>> it).
>> I did run the unit tests:
>> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>>
>> regards,
>> Harry
>>
>>>
>>
>> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
>>> possible
>>> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
>> certainly
>>> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>>>
>>> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
>>> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
>>> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
>>> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
>> (nor
>>> its parent: ModuleManager).
>>>
>>> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
>>> It is referencing a non-existent page
>> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
>>> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
>>> tho.
>>>
>>> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for
>> my
>>> environment.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
>>> happens
>>>> to be on my machine but not yours?
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave,
>>>>>
>>>>> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
>>> specific
>>>> ?
>>>>> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
>>>> file,
>>>>> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
>>>> URL.
>>>>> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>>>>>
>>>>> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
>>>> tests).
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Harry
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
>>>> build
>>>>>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
>>> to
>>>> it
>>>>>> is out of date.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>> life
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
>> florian@holeczek.de
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>>>>>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Florian,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
>> work
>>> on
>>>>>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
>>>> looks
>>>>>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
>> instead.
>>> I
>>>>>> also
>>>>>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
>>> the
>>>>>> JIRA
>>>>>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
>>> 2.8.
>>>>>> code
>>>>>>> base.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
>> seems
>>>> from
>>>>>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>> life
>>>>>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
>>> Mandela
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
>>>> florian@holeczek.de>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
>> Seems
>>>> as
>>>>>> if
>>>>>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
>> Janne
>>>>>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
>>> try
>>>>>> ;)
>>>>>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
>>>> good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
>>>> level
>>>>>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>>>>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>>>>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
>>> mainly
>>>>>>> done by Janne
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have
>> a
>>>>>> look
>>>>>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Florian
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>>>>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>>>>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>>>>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
>>>> base.
>>>>>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
>>> and
>>>> I
>>>>>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
>>>> devote
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Dave Wolf
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
>>> life
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>>>>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
>>> TLP
>>>>>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
>> a
>>>>>> set
>>>>>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
>> believe
>>>> all
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
>> process?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
>> have
>>> a
>>>>>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
>>> people
>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
>> contribute
>>>> to
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> codebase.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Janne
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
Hi Dave,
the trunk is where main development takes place. As soon as there's a major release, this one will be tagged and branched. From then on, development of the next release takes place in the trunk, while bugfixes for major releases will be made in the corresponding branches.
What would be the reason/advantage to first create a branch and then merge it back?
Regards
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: "Harry Metske" <ha...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. März 2011 15:04:41
Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the supported
part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might reduce
the scope when debugging.
Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
truck after 3.0 is working and out?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
H: 303-377-9537
M: 303-956-9106
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Dave,
>
> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
> one).
> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a wysiwyg
> editor that were not resolved yet.
> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
> willing to give some support on it.
> JSPWiki can work without it.
>
> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have ignored
> it).
> I did run the unit tests:
> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
> >
>
> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> > possible
> > that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
> certainly
> > understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
> >
> > The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
> > TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> > "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> > The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
> (nor
> > its parent: ModuleManager).
> >
> > The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> > It is referencing a non-existent page
> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> > or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
> > tho.
> >
> > The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for
> my
> > environment.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> > happens
> > > to be on my machine but not yours?
> > >
> > > /Janne
> > >
> > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dave,
> > > >
> > > > as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> > specific
> > > ?
> > > > Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
> > > file,
> > > > that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
> > > URL.
> > > > (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> > > >
> > > > Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
> > > tests).
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Harry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> > > build
> > > >> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
> > to
> > > it
> > > >> is out of date.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dave Wolf
> > > >>
> > > >> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >> that
> > > >> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
> florian@holeczek.de
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Dave,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Florian
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > > >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > > >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hey Florian,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
> work
> > on
> > > >>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> > > looks
> > > >>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
> instead.
> > I
> > > >> also
> > > >>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
> > the
> > > >> JIRA
> > > >>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
> > 2.8.
> > > >> code
> > > >>> base.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
> seems
> > > from
> > > >>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> > > >> release.
> > > >>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dave Wolf
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> > Mandela
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> > > florian@holeczek.de>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
> Seems
> > > as
> > > >> if
> > > >>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
> Janne
> > > >>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
> > try
> > > >> ;)
> > > >>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> > > good.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> > > level
> > > >>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > > >>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > > >>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> > mainly
> > > >>> done by Janne
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have
> a
> > > >> look
> > > >>> at the open JIRA issues.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Florian
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > > >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> > > base.
> > > >>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
> > and
> > > I
> > > >>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> > > devote
> > > >> to
> > > >>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Dave Wolf
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >>> that
> > > >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > > >>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> > TLP
> > > >>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
> a
> > > >> set
> > > >>>>> of failing unit tests.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
> believe
> > > all
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> > > >> their
> > > >>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
> process?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
> have
> > a
> > > >>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> > people
> > > >> who
> > > >>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> contribute
> > > to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>> codebase.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> /Janne
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
Maybe we should move classes, JSPs, etc that are not part of the supported
part of the release under a "saved-src" directory. That way it will be
easier for new developers to know what is in / out and plus it might reduce
the scope when debugging.
Another thought, should we create a 3.0 branch and then merge back to the
truck after 3.0 is working and out?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
H: 303-377-9537
M: 303-956-9106
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Dave,
>
> you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first
> one).
> I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a wysiwyg
> editor that were not resolved yet.
> So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
> willing to give some support on it.
> JSPWiki can work without it.
>
> I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have ignored
> it).
> I did run the unit tests:
> http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
> >
>
> 2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>
> > As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> > possible
> > that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can
> certainly
> > understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
> >
> > The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
> > TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> > "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> > The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager
> (nor
> > its parent: ModuleManager).
> >
> > The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> > It is referencing a non-existent page
> (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> > or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
> > tho.
> >
> > The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for
> my
> > environment.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> > happens
> > > to be on my machine but not yours?
> > >
> > > /Janne
> > >
> > > On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dave,
> > > >
> > > > as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> > specific
> > > ?
> > > > Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
> > > file,
> > > > that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
> > > URL.
> > > > (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> > > >
> > > > Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
> > > tests).
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > > Harry
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > >> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> > > build
> > > >> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
> > to
> > > it
> > > >> is out of date.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dave Wolf
> > > >>
> > > >> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >> that
> > > >> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <
> florian@holeczek.de
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hi Dave,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Florian
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > > >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > > >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hey Florian,
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd
> work
> > on
> > > >>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> > > looks
> > > >>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch
> instead.
> > I
> > > >> also
> > > >>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
> > the
> > > >> JIRA
> > > >>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
> > 2.8.
> > > >> code
> > > >>> base.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It
> seems
> > > from
> > > >>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> > > >> release.
> > > >>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Dave Wolf
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> > Mandela
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> > > florian@holeczek.de>
> > > >>> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute.
> Seems
> > > as
> > > >> if
> > > >>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as
> Janne
> > > >>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
> > try
> > > >> ;)
> > > >>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> > > good.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> > > level
> > > >>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > > >>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > > >>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> > mainly
> > > >>> done by Janne
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have
> a
> > > >> look
> > > >>> at the open JIRA issues.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Florian
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > >>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > > >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> > > base.
> > > >>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
> > and
> > > I
> > > >>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> > > devote
> > > >> to
> > > >>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards,
> > > >>> Dave Wolf
> > > >>>
> > > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> > life
> > > >>> that
> > > >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > > >>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> > TLP
> > > >>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
> a
> > > >> set
> > > >>>>> of failing unit tests.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I
> believe
> > > all
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> > > >> their
> > > >>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release
> process?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
> have
> > a
> > > >>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> > people
> > > >> who
> > > >>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> contribute
> > > to
> > > >>> the
> > > >>>> codebase.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> /Janne
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
Dave,
you are correct, I saw that same JSP compile error (at least the first one).
I'm not sure but there have been discussions on the inclusion of a wysiwyg
editor that were not resolved yet.
So FCK is probably not considered part of core JSPWiki until someone is
willing to give some support on it.
JSPWiki can work without it.
I have not seen the error in TestMigratorForm.jsp (I think I have ignored
it).
I did run the unit tests:
http://people.apache.org/~metskem/tests/junit-noframes.html
regards,
Harry
>
2011/3/9 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it
> possible
> that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can certainly
> understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
>
> The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
> TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
> "scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
> The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager (nor
> its parent: ModuleManager).
>
> The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
> It is referencing a non-existent page (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
> or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
> tho.
>
> The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for my
> environment.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com
> >wrote:
>
> >
> > My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that
> happens
> > to be on my machine but not yours?
> >
> > /Janne
> >
> > On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> >
> > > Dave,
> > >
> > > as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more
> specific
> > ?
> > > Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
> > file,
> > > that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
> > URL.
> > > (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> > >
> > > Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
> > tests).
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Harry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > >> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> > build
> > >> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference
> to
> > it
> > >> is out of date.
> > >>
> > >> Dave Wolf
> > >>
> > >> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> > >> that
> > >> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi Dave,
> > >>>
> > >>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Florian
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > >>>
> > >>> Hey Florian,
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work
> on
> > >>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> > looks
> > >>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead.
> I
> > >> also
> > >>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
> the
> > >> JIRA
> > >>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
> 2.8.
> > >> code
> > >>> base.
> > >>>
> > >>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems
> > from
> > >>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> > >> release.
> > >>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> > >>>
> > >>> Dave Wolf
> > >>>
> > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> > >>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> Mandela
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> > florian@holeczek.de>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> > >>>
> > >>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems
> > as
> > >> if
> > >>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> > >>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
> try
> > >> ;)
> > >>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> > good.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> > level
> > >>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > >>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > >>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> mainly
> > >>> done by Janne
> > >>>
> > >>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> > >> look
> > >>> at the open JIRA issues.
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Florian
> > >>>
> > >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> > base.
> > >>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
> and
> > I
> > >>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> > devote
> > >> to
> > >>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> > >>>
> > >>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>> Dave Wolf
> > >>>
> > >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> > >>> that
> > >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > >>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> TLP
> > >>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
> > >> set
> > >>>>> of failing unit tests.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe
> > all
> > >>> the
> > >>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> > >> their
> > >>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have
> a
> > >>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> people
> > >> who
> > >>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute
> > to
> > >>> the
> > >>>> codebase.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> /Janne
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
As far as I can tell these are legitimate compilation errors. Is it possible
that the jsp compilation doesn't have FCK.jsp in its path? I can certainly
understand why you might wouldn't pre-compile the test JSPs.
The first issue is is in templates/default/editors/FCK.jsp, line 51:
TemplateManager.addResourceRequest( context, "script",
"scripts/fckeditor/fckeditor.js" );
The method addResourceRequest doesn't appear to be in TemplateManager (nor
its parent: ModuleManager).
The next issue is in tests/etc/TestMigratorForm.jsp, line 25:
It is referencing a non-existent page (templates/default/LoginContent.jsp)
or at least it is non-existing in the trunk. It existed in the 2.8 branch
tho.
The third issue was an eclipse configuration issue, which I've fixed for my
environment.
Cheers,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that happens
> to be on my machine but not yours?
>
> /Janne
>
> On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
>
> > Dave,
> >
> > as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more specific
> ?
> > Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war
> file,
> > that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki
> URL.
> > (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
> >
> > Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029
> tests).
> >
> > regards,
> > Harry
> >
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> build
> >> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to
> it
> >> is out of date.
> >>
> >> Dave Wolf
> >>
> >> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >> that
> >> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> >>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Dave,
> >>>
> >>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Florian
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> >>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> >>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>
> >>> Hey Florian,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
> >>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> looks
> >>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I
> >> also
> >>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the
> >> JIRA
> >>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8.
> >> code
> >>> base.
> >>>
> >>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems
> from
> >>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> >> release.
> >>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >>>
> >>> Dave Wolf
> >>>
> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> florian@holeczek.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >>>
> >>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems
> as
> >> if
> >>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> >>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try
> >> ;)
> >>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> good.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> level
> >>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> >>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> >>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> >>> done by Janne
> >>>
> >>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> >> look
> >>> at the open JIRA issues.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Florian
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> >>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> >>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> >>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> base.
> >>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and
> I
> >>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> devote
> >> to
> >>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >>>
> >>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Dave Wolf
> >>>
> >>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> >>> that
> >>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> >>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> >>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
> >> set
> >>>>> of failing unit tests.
> >>>>
> >>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe
> all
> >>> the
> >>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> >> their
> >>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> >>>>
> >>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> >>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people
> >> who
> >>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute
> to
> >>> the
> >>>> codebase.
> >>>>
> >>>> /Janne
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
My trunk works, btw - could be that there's some hidden setup that happens to be on my machine but not yours?
/Janne
On Mar 8, 2011, at 20:30 , Harry Metske wrote:
> Dave,
>
> as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more specific ?
> Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war file,
> that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki URL.
> (after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
>
> Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029 tests).
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
>
>
> 2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
>
>> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several build
>> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to it
>> is out of date.
>>
>> Dave Wolf
>>
>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>> that
>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Florian
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
>>> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
>>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>
>>> Hey Florian,
>>>
>>> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
>>> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks
>>> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I
>> also
>>> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the
>> JIRA
>>> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8.
>> code
>>> base.
>>>
>>> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from
>>> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
>> release.
>>> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>>>
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek < florian@holeczek.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>>>
>>> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as
>> if
>>> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
>>> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try
>> ;)
>>> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
>>>
>>> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level
>>> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
>>> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
>>> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
>>> done by Janne
>>>
>>> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
>> look
>>> at the open JIRA issues.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Florian
>>>
>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
>>> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
>>> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
>>> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
>>> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
>>> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
>>> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote
>> to
>>> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>>>
>>> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Dave Wolf
>>>
>>> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
>>> that
>>> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
>>> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
>>>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
>> set
>>>>> of failing unit tests.
>>>>
>>>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>>>
>>>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all
>>> the
>>>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
>> their
>>>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
>>>>
>>>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
>>>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people
>> who
>>>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to
>>> the
>>>> codebase.
>>>>
>>>> /Janne
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
Dave,
as far as I know there is nothing missing, can you be a bit more specific ?
Running "ant war" on the trunk (v3.0.0-svn-224) gives me a proper war file,
that I can deploy on Tomcat and I can point my browser to the JSPWiki URL.
(after that it stops, because the trunk is simple not working).
Running the junit tests gives me 2 failures and 1 error (out of 1029 tests).
regards,
Harry
2011/3/8 Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>
> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several build
> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to it
> is out of date.
>
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >
> > Hey Florian,
> >
> > Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
> > getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks
> > like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I
> also
> > just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the
> JIRA
> > is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8.
> code
> > base.
> >
> > I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from
> > JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> release.
> > Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek < florian@holeczek.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >
> > Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as
> if
> > there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> > describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try
> ;)
> > Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
> >
> > I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level
> > view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> > done by Janne
> >
> > Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> look
> > at the open JIRA issues.
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
> > Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
> > had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote
> to
> > JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >
> > What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
> set
> > > > of failing unit tests.
> > >
> > > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > >
> > > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all
> > the
> > > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> their
> > > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> > >
> > > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> > > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people
> who
> > > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to
> > the
> > > codebase.
> > >
> > > /Janne
> >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by George Laframboise <li...@gmail.com>.
thx
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Georga,
>
> we can't, but you can.
> by sending an email to jspwiki-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>
> regards,
> Harry
>
> 2011/3/8 George Laframboise <li...@gmail.com>
>
> > Can you remove me from this email list ? thx
> >
> >
> > George M. Laframboise
> > LightWorx Technology Consulting LLC
> > lightwrx@gmail.com
> > 303-517-2454
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> > build
> > > errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to
> > it
> > > is out of date.
> > >
> > > Dave Wolf
> > >
> > > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > > that
> > > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> > > >wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Dave,
> > > >
> > > > the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Florian
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > > Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > > > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > > > Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > > > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >
> > > > Hey Florian,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work
> on
> > > > getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> > looks
> > > > like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead.
> I
> > > also
> > > > just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to
> the
> > > JIRA
> > > > is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with
> 2.8.
> > > code
> > > > base.
> > > >
> > > > I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems
> > from
> > > > JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> > > release.
> > > > Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> > > >
> > > > Dave Wolf
> > > >
> > > > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> > > > that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson
> Mandela
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> > florian@holeczek.de>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> > > >
> > > > Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems
> > as
> > > if
> > > > there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> > > > describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to
> try
> > > ;)
> > > > Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> > good.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> > level
> > > > view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > > > * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > > > * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170),
> mainly
> > > > done by Janne
> > > >
> > > > Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> > > look
> > > > at the open JIRA issues.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > Florian
> > > >
> > > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > > Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > > > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > > CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > > > Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > > > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> > base.
> > > > Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years)
> and
> > I
> > > > had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> > devote
> > > to
> > > > JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> > > >
> > > > What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Dave Wolf
> > > >
> > > > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a
> life
> > > > that
> > > > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > > > < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> > TLP
> > > > > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is
> a
> > > set
> > > > > > of failing unit tests.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe
> > all
> > > > the
> > > > > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> > > their
> > > > > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> > > > >
> > > > > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they
> have
> > a
> > > > > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need
> people
> > > who
> > > > > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to
> contribute
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > codebase.
> > > > >
> > > > > /Janne
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
George M. Laframboise
LightWorx Technology Consulting LLC
lightwrx@gmail.com
303-517-2454
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Harry Metske <ha...@gmail.com>.
Georga,
we can't, but you can.
by sending an email to jspwiki-dev-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
regards,
Harry
2011/3/8 George Laframboise <li...@gmail.com>
> Can you remove me from this email list ? thx
>
>
> George M. Laframboise
> LightWorx Technology Consulting LLC
> lightwrx@gmail.com
> 303-517-2454
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several
> build
> > errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to
> it
> > is out of date.
> >
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Dave,
> > >
> > > the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Florian
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > > Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > > Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > >
> > > Hey Florian,
> > >
> > > Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
> > > getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch --
> looks
> > > like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I
> > also
> > > just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the
> > JIRA
> > > is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8.
> > code
> > > base.
> > >
> > > I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems
> from
> > > JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> > release.
> > > Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> > >
> > > Dave Wolf
> > >
> > > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > > that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <
> florian@holeczek.de>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> > >
> > > Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems
> as
> > if
> > > there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> > > describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try
> > ;)
> > > Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite
> good.
> > >
> > > I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top
> level
> > > view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > > * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > > * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> > > done by Janne
> > >
> > > Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> > look
> > > at the open JIRA issues.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Florian
> > >
> > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > > Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > > Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code
> base.
> > > Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and
> I
> > > had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to
> devote
> > to
> > > JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> > >
> > > What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Dave Wolf
> > >
> > > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > > that
> > > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > > < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking
> TLP
> > > > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
> > set
> > > > > of failing unit tests.
> > > >
> > > > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > > >
> > > > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe
> all
> > > the
> > > > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> > their
> > > > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> > > >
> > > > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have
> a
> > > > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people
> > who
> > > > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute
> to
> > > the
> > > > codebase.
> > > >
> > > > /Janne
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by George Laframboise <li...@gmail.com>.
Can you remove me from this email list ? thx
George M. Laframboise
LightWorx Technology Consulting LLC
lightwrx@gmail.com
303-517-2454
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:50 AM, Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several build
> errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to it
> is out of date.
>
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <florian@holeczek.de
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > the correct one is the trunk ;-)
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> > Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >
> > Hey Florian,
> >
> > Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
> > getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks
> > like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I
> also
> > just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the
> JIRA
> > is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8.
> code
> > base.
> >
> > I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from
> > JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha
> release.
> > Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
> >
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek < florian@holeczek.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Dave, and welcome back!
> >
> > Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as
> if
> > there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> > describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try
> ;)
> > Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
> >
> > I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level
> > view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> > * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> > * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> > done by Janne
> >
> > Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a
> look
> > at the open JIRA issues.
> >
> > Regards
> > Florian
> >
> > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> > An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> > Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> > Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
> > Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
> > had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote
> to
> > JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
> >
> > What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dave Wolf
> >
> > "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> > that
> > is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> > < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a
> set
> > > > of failing unit tests.
> > >
> > > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> > >
> > > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all
> > the
> > > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on
> their
> > > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> > >
> > > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> > > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people
> who
> > > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to
> > the
> > > codebase.
> > >
> > > /Janne
> >
> >
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
Are there some files that need to be checked in? There were several build
errors. it appears that LoginContext.jsp is missing or the reference to it
is out of date.
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> the correct one is the trunk ;-)
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <
> Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>
> Hey Florian,
>
> Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
> getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks
> like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I also
> just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the JIRA
> is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8. code
> base.
>
> I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from
> JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha release.
> Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
>
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek < florian@holeczek.de >
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>
> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as if
> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try ;)
> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
>
> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level
> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> done by Janne
>
> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a look
> at the open JIRA issues.
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>
>
>
>
> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>
> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> > > of failing unit tests.
> >
> > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >
> > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all
> the
> > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
> > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> >
> > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
> > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to
> the
> > codebase.
> >
> > /Janne
>
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
Hi Dave,
the correct one is the trunk ;-)
Regards
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: "Florian Holeczek" <fl...@holeczek.de>, "Janne Jalkanen" <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. März 2011 05:32:16
Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Hey Florian,
Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I also just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the JIRA is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8. code base.
I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha release. Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek < florian@holeczek.de > wrote:
Hi Dave, and welcome back!
Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as if there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try ;) Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
* front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
* back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly done by Janne
Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a look at the open JIRA issues.
Regards
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Dave Wolf" < dave.wolf@gmail.com >
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: "Janne Jalkanen" < Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >
Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
< Janne.Jalkanen@ecyrd.com >wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> > of failing unit tests.
>
> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>
> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all the
> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
>
> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to the
> codebase.
>
> /Janne
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
Hey Florian,
Thanks! I'm glad to help out however I can. I thought maybe I'd work on
getting the unit tests to work. So, I checked out the 2.8 branch -- looks
like I should have gone for either the stripes or jcr branch instead. I also
just noticed that the package listed in the test report attached to the JIRA
is the new org.apache.wiki.* package -- obviously not a match with 2.8. code
base.
I wonder if I'm looking at the right Subversion repository? It seems from
JIRA that there isn't much to do prior to releasing a v 3.0 alpha release.
Is there another branch somewhere that I'm missing?
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>wrote:
> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>
> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as if
> there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne
> describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try ;)
> Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
>
> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level
> view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly
> done by Janne
>
> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a look
> at the open JIRA issues.
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>
> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>
> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life
> that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> > > of failing unit tests.
> >
> > 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
> >
> > Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all
> the
> > current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
> > shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
> >
> > This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> > continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
> > can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to
> the
> > codebase.
> >
> > /Janne
>
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
Hi Dave, and welcome :-)
Yeah, the documentation is fairly comprehensive - the big issue is that the first release will be looked at fairly carefully, but the folks at incubator-list are quite helpful (though sometimes a bit terse) in their comments. The big things are the IP clearances.
As such, we really need just someone to coordinate and push the release through. It doesn't basically even need to compile, just get a release out of the door so that we can become a top-level-project (TLP).
/Janne
On Mar 7, 2011, at 08:43 , Florian Holeczek wrote:
> Hi Dave, and welcome back!
>
> Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as if there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try ;) Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
>
> I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
> * front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
> * back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly done by Janne
>
> Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a look at the open JIRA issues.
>
> Regards
> Florian
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
> An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
> CC: "Janne Jalkanen" <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
> Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
> Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
>
> I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
> Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
> had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
> JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
>
> What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
>
> Regards,
> Dave Wolf
>
> "There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
> is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> <Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>>
>>> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
>>> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
>>> of failing unit tests.
>>
>> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>>
>> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all the
>> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
>> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
>>
>> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
>> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
>> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to the
>> codebase.
>>
>> /Janne
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Florian Holeczek <fl...@holeczek.de>.
Hi Dave, and welcome back!
Happy to read that there are some people willing to contribute. Seems as if there's still lack of people who can coordinate the release, as Janne describes it. Well, never done that before, but I would be ready to try ;) Can't be that hard, since Apache's documentation seems to be quite good.
I'm not very deep into the codebase, but I can at least give a top level view. The two major changes in 3.0 are
* front end uses the Stripes framework, mainly done by Andrew
* back end uses the Java Content Repository interface (JSR-170), mainly done by Janne
Guess the easiest way to start is to dig into the codebase and have a look at the open JIRA issues.
Regards
Florian
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
Von: "Dave Wolf" <da...@gmail.com>
An: jspwiki-dev@incubator.apache.org
CC: "Janne Jalkanen" <Ja...@ecyrd.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 7. März 2011 02:28:57
Betreff: Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> > of failing unit tests.
>
> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>
> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all the
> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
>
> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to the
> codebase.
>
> /Janne
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Dave Wolf <da...@gmail.com>.
I would be willing to get involved again and contribute to the code base.
Sorry for the late response, I've been away for a while ('er years) and I
had the messages getting filtered. I should have a bit of time to devote to
JSPWiki. I'm pretty far out of the loop tho.
What (Java) issues might I focus on first?
Regards,
Dave Wolf
"There is no passion to be found playing small - in settling for a life that
is less than the one you are capable of living." --Nelson Mandela
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Janne Jalkanen
<Ja...@ecyrd.com>wrote:
>
> On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> > So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> > is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> > of failing unit tests.
>
> 3.0 is quite useless atm though...
>
> Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all the
> current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their
> shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
>
> This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a
> continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who
> can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to the
> codebase.
>
> /Janne
Re: Releasing 3.0.0-alpha...
Posted by Janne Jalkanen <Ja...@ecyrd.com>.
On Nov 17, 2010, at 08:38 , Henri Yandell wrote:
> So ignoring some paperwork, it seems that the only thing blocking TLP
> is a release, and the only thing blocking a release (in JIRA) is a set
> of failing unit tests.
3.0 is quite useless atm though...
Also, since our community seems a bit subdued these days (I believe all the current committers have other responsibilities weighing heavily on their shoulders), who would volunteer to run through the release process?
This would be a good time for people to step up and say if they have a continued interest in JSPWiki and are willing to help. We need people who can coordinate the release, and others who are willing to contribute to the codebase.
/Janne