You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Nick Kew <ni...@webthing.com> on 2007/04/26 17:58:03 UTC
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39710] - mod_cgi truncates error replies
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
> ------- Additional Comments From bkline@rksystems.com 2007-04-26
> 07:21 ------- (In reply to comment #7)
> > Anything I can do to help get this bug fixed? Is testing the patch
> > all that stands in the way of getting it folded into the trunk?
>
> Hello? Anybody home? What's next?
He has a good point: this bug is a regression.
I'm not entirely clear on the problem that was being fixed
in the patch that introduced it. But it looks like confusion
between different CGI error paths.
If noone has the round tuits to work through a fix, can we just
apply the patch (which reverses r231167)?
--
Nick Kew
Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book
http://www.apachetutor.org/
Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39710] - mod_cgi truncates error replies
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Apr 26, 2007, at 11:58 AM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:21:27 -0700 (PDT)
> bugzilla@apache.org wrote:
>
>> ------- Additional Comments From bkline@rksystems.com 2007-04-26
>> 07:21 ------- (In reply to comment #7)
>>> Anything I can do to help get this bug fixed? Is testing the patch
>>> all that stands in the way of getting it folded into the trunk?
>>
>> Hello? Anybody home? What's next?
>
> He has a good point: this bug is a regression.
>
> I'm not entirely clear on the problem that was being fixed
> in the patch that introduced it. But it looks like confusion
> between different CGI error paths.
>
> If noone has the round tuits to work through a fix, can we just
> apply the patch (which reverses r231167)?
>
Can we confirm that we don't still suffer from the original
problem?