You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/04/12 17:52:32 UTC
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-207) snappuller inefficient finding latest
snapshot
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12488413 ]
Bertrand Delacretaz commented on SOLR-207:
------------------------------------------
IIUC the snapshot directories are named like
snapshot.YYYYMMDDHHMMSS
and they are all under the same parent directory.
If that's the case, then doing
ls -rt ${data_dir}/snapshot.* | head -1
will return the name of the most recent directory, efficiently.
> snappuller inefficient finding latest snapshot
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-207
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: replication
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: find_maxdepth.patch
>
>
> snapinstaller (and snappuller) do the following to find the latest snapshot:
> name=`find ${data_dir} -name snapshot.* -print|grep -v wip|sort -r|head -1`
> This recurses into all of the snapshot directories, doing much more disk-io than is necessary.
> I think it is the cause of bloated kernel memory usage we have seen on some of our Linux boxes, caused
> by kernel dentry and inode caches. Those caches compete with buffer cache (caching the actual data of the index)
> and can thus decrease performance.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.