You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/24 20:00:52 UTC
[VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
JAMES 2.3.x contains mailet and mailet-api jars. the contents are now
in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/. this means
that clearly API classes such as Mailet are mixed in with clearly
utility classes such as GenericMailet. it would be good to release
2.3.x improvements to these classes but IMO this needs to be sorted
out first.
we've talk before about whether a library for utility classes (in
addition to standard-mailets) would be useful. i would like to propose
introducing mailet-base to contain utility classes for the mailet-api.
this would leave standard-mailets free for implementations and
mailet-api free to contain just the API. i propose to judge each
classes in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/ by
it's merits so i don't want to propose contents at this stage just
principle.
here's my +1
- robert
--8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 Create mailet-base
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 Do not create mailet-base
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
i count:
+1 Robert Burrell Donkin
+1 Stefano Bagnara
+1 Danny Angus
+1 Søren Hilmer
+1 Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini
please jump in if i've missed any binding VOTEs
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org> wrote:
> > here's my +1
and mine
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
> JAMES 2.3.x contains mailet and mailet-api jars. the contents are now
> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/. this means
> that clearly API classes such as Mailet are mixed in with clearly
> utility classes such as GenericMailet. it would be good to release
> 2.3.x improvements to these classes but IMO this needs to be sorted
> out first.
>
> we've talk before about whether a library for utility classes (in
> addition to standard-mailets) would be useful. i would like to propose
> introducing mailet-base to contain utility classes for the mailet-api.
> this would leave standard-mailets free for implementations and
> mailet-api free to contain just the API. i propose to judge each
> classes in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/ by
> it's merits so i don't want to propose contents at this stage just
> principle.
>
> here's my +1
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------
[X] +1 Create mailet-base
I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there,
because I agree that mailet-base is needed, but I don't know if we agree
on what to move there ;-)
IMO Generic*, RFC2822Headers and the "dates" package should be moved there.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vi...@praxis.it>.
>
>
> [x] +1 Create mailet-base
Vincenzo
Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
if anyone else wants to express an opinion, please do so now
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
<ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> JAMES 2.3.x contains mailet and mailet-api jars. the contents are now
> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/. this means
> that clearly API classes such as Mailet are mixed in with clearly
> utility classes such as GenericMailet. it would be good to release
> 2.3.x improvements to these classes but IMO this needs to be sorted
> out first.
>
> we've talk before about whether a library for utility classes (in
> addition to standard-mailets) would be useful. i would like to propose
> introducing mailet-base to contain utility classes for the mailet-api.
> this would leave standard-mailets free for implementations and
> mailet-api free to contain just the API. i propose to judge each
> classes in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/ by
> it's merits so i don't want to propose contents at this stage just
> principle.
>
> here's my +1
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 Create mailet-base
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not create mailet-base
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Introduce mailet-base product
Posted by Søren Hilmer <sh...@widetrail.dk>.
+1
On the question to move in the direction of a mailet-building toolkit, I
think that is a good idea.
--Søren
--
Søren Hilmer, M.Sc., M.Crypt.
wideTrail Phone: +45 25481225
Pilevænget 41 Email: sh@widetrail.dk
DK-8961 Allingåbro Web: www.widetrail.dk
On Thu, April 24, 2008 20:00, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> JAMES 2.3.x contains mailet and mailet-api jars. the contents are now
> in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/. this means
> that clearly API classes such as Mailet are mixed in with clearly
> utility classes such as GenericMailet. it would be good to release
> 2.3.x improvements to these classes but IMO this needs to be sorted
> out first.
>
> we've talk before about whether a library for utility classes (in
> addition to standard-mailets) would be useful. i would like to propose
> introducing mailet-base to contain utility classes for the mailet-api.
> this would leave standard-mailets free for implementations and
> mailet-api free to contain just the API. i propose to judge each
> classes in http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mailet/api/trunk/ by
> it's merits so i don't want to propose contents at this stage just
> principle.
>
> here's my +1
>
> - robert
>
> --8<-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 Create mailet-base
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -0
> [ ] -1 Do not create mailet-base
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org