You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Gabriele Kahlout <ga...@mysimpatico.com> on 2011/07/12 15:38:44 UTC
Can I still search documents once updated?
@Test
public void testUpdateLoseTermsSimplified() throws Exception {
* IndexWriter writer = indexDoc();*
assertEquals(1, writer.numDocs());
IndexSearcher searcher = getSearcher(writer);
final TermQuery termQuery = new TermQuery(new Term(content,
"essen"));
TopDocs docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);
assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);
Document doc = searcher.doc(0);
* writer.updateDocument(new Term(id,doc.get(id)),doc);*
searcher = getSearcher(writer);
* docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);*
* assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);*//docs.totalHits == 0 !
}
testUpdateLosesTerms(com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest) Time elapsed:
0.346 sec <<< FAILURE!
java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454)
at
com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest.testUpdateLosesTerms(WcTest.java:271)
I have not changed anything (as you can see) during the update. I just
retrieve a document and the update it. But then the termQuery that worked
before doesn't work anymore (while the "id" field wasn't changed). Is this
to be expected when content field is not stored?
--
Regards,
K. Gabriele
--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Michael Kuhlmann <so...@kuli.org>.
Am 13.07.2011 16:09, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
> Solr is already configured by default not to store more than a
> <maxFieldLength> anyway. Usually one stores content only to display
> snippets.
Yes, but the snippets must come from somewhere.
For instance, if you're using Solr's highlighting feature, all
highlighted fields must be stored.
See http://www.intellog.com/blog/?p=208 for explanation from someone
else. ;)
Greetings,
Kuli
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Gabriele Kahlout <ga...@mysimpatico.com>.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:54 PM, Michael Kuhlmann <so...@kuli.org> wrote:
> Am 13.07.2011 15:37, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
> > Well, I'm !sure how usual this scenario would be:
> > 1. In general those using solr with nutch don't store the content field
> to
> > avoid storing the whole web/intranet in their index, twice (1 in the form
> of
> > stored data, and one in the form of indexed data).
> >
>
> Not exactly. The indexed form is quite different from the stored form;
> only the tokens are stored, each token only once, and some additional
> data like the document count and, maybe, shingle information etc..
>
> Hence, indexed data usually needs much less space on disk than the
> original data.
>
I realized that. Maybe I should have said "1.X (1 in the form of stored data
and 0.X in the form of indexed data).
>
> There's no practical alternative to storing the content in a stored
> field. What would you otherwise display as a search result? "The
> following web pages have your search term somewhere in their contents,
> don't know where, take a look on your own"?
>
> Display the title, and url (and implicitly say "The
following web pages have your search term somewhere in their contents, don't
REMEMBER where, take a look on your own"?).
Solr is already configured by default not to store more than a
<maxFieldLength> anyway. Usually one stores content only to display
snippets.
> Greetings,
> Kuli
>
--
Regards,
K. Gabriele
--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Michael Kuhlmann <so...@kuli.org>.
Am 13.07.2011 15:37, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
> Well, I'm !sure how usual this scenario would be:
> 1. In general those using solr with nutch don't store the content field to
> avoid storing the whole web/intranet in their index, twice (1 in the form of
> stored data, and one in the form of indexed data).
>
Not exactly. The indexed form is quite different from the stored form;
only the tokens are stored, each token only once, and some additional
data like the document count and, maybe, shingle information etc..
Hence, indexed data usually needs much less space on disk than the
original data.
There's no practical alternative to storing the content in a stored
field. What would you otherwise display as a search result? "The
following web pages have your search term somewhere in their contents,
don't know where, take a look on your own"?
Greetings,
Kuli
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Gabriele Kahlout <ga...@mysimpatico.com>.
Well, I'm !sure how usual this scenario would be:
1. In general those using solr with nutch don't store the content field to
avoid storing the whole web/intranet in their index, twice (1 in the form of
stored data, and one in the form of indexed data).
Now everytime they need to update a field unrelated to content (number of
inbound links for an example) they would have to re-crawl the page again.
This is at least !intuitive.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Michael Kuhlmann <so...@kuli.org> wrote:
> Am 13.07.2011 14:05, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
> > this is what i was expecting. Otherwise updating a field of a document
> that
> > has an unstored but indexed field is impossible (without losing the
> unstored
> > but indexed field. I call this updating a field of a document AND
> > deleting/updating all its unstored but indexed fields).
>
> Not necessarily. The usual use case is that you have some kind of
> existing data source from where you fill your Solr index. When you want
> to update field of a document, then you simply re-index from that
> source. There's no need to fetch data from Solr before.
>
> Otherwise, if you really don't have such an existing data source because
> a horde of typewriting monkeys filled your Solr index, then you should
> better declare all your fields as stored. Otherwise you'll never have a
> chance to get that data back.
>
> Greeting,
> Kuli
>
--
Regards,
K. Gabriele
--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Michael Kuhlmann <so...@kuli.org>.
Am 13.07.2011 14:05, schrieb Gabriele Kahlout:
> this is what i was expecting. Otherwise updating a field of a document that
> has an unstored but indexed field is impossible (without losing the unstored
> but indexed field. I call this updating a field of a document AND
> deleting/updating all its unstored but indexed fields).
Not necessarily. The usual use case is that you have some kind of
existing data source from where you fill your Solr index. When you want
to update field of a document, then you simply re-index from that
source. There's no need to fetch data from Solr before.
Otherwise, if you really don't have such an existing data source because
a horde of typewriting monkeys filled your Solr index, then you should
better declare all your fields as stored. Otherwise you'll never have a
chance to get that data back.
Greeting,
Kuli
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Gabriele Kahlout <ga...@mysimpatico.com>.
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Wait, you directly contradicted yourself <G>.... You say it's
> not stored, then you say it's stored and indexed, which is it?
>
ja, i meant indexed and not stored.
>
> When you fetch a document, only stored fields are returned
> and the returned data is the verbatim copy of the original
> data. No attempt is made to return un-stored fields. This
> has been the behavior allways. If you attempted to returned
> indexed but not stored data, you'd get stemmed versions,
> stop words would be removed, synonyms would be in place
> etc. Not to mention it would be very slow.
>
this is what i was expecting. Otherwise updating a field of a document that
has an unstored but indexed field is impossible (without losing the unstored
but indexed field. I call this updating a field of a document AND
deleting/updating all its unstored but indexed fields).
>
> If the field is stored, then there's another problem, you might
> want to dump the document after reading it from the IR.
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
> <ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
> > It indeed is not stored, but this is still unexpected behavior. It's a
> > stored and indexed field, why has the index data been lost?
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Erick Erickson <
> erickerickson@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Unless you stored your "content" field, the value you put in there won't
> >> be fetched from the index. Verify that the doc you retrieve from the
> index
> >> has values for "content", I bet it doesn't....
> >>
> >> Best
> >> Erick
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
> >> <ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
> >> > @Test
> >> > public void testUpdateLoseTermsSimplified() throws Exception {
> >> > * IndexWriter writer = indexDoc();*
> >> > assertEquals(1, writer.numDocs());
> >> > IndexSearcher searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> >> > final TermQuery termQuery = new TermQuery(new Term(content,
> >> > "essen"));
> >> >
> >> > TopDocs docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);
> >> > assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);
> >> > Document doc = searcher.doc(0);
> >> >
> >> > * writer.updateDocument(new Term(id,doc.get(id)),doc);*
> >> >
> >> > searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> >> > * docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);*
> >> > * assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);*//docs.totalHits == 0 !
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > testUpdateLosesTerms(com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest) Time
> >> elapsed:
> >> > 0.346 sec <<< FAILURE!
> >> > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> >> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> >> > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
> >> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> >> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
> >> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >>
> com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest.testUpdateLosesTerms(WcTest.java:271)
> >> >
> >> > I have not changed anything (as you can see) during the update. I just
> >> > retrieve a document and the update it. But then the termQuery that
> worked
> >> > before doesn't work anymore (while the "id" field wasn't changed). Is
> >> this
> >> > to be expected when content field is not stored?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Regards,
> >> > K. Gabriele
> >> >
> >> > --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> >> > P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> >> > receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> >> > subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧
> >> time(x)
> >> > < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
> >> >
> >> > If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the
> >> email
> >> > does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid
> >> code
> >> > starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> >> > ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y
> ∈
> >> > L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > K. Gabriele
> >
> > --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> > P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> > receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> > subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧
> time(x)
> > < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
> >
> > If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the
> email
> > does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid
> code
> > starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> > ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
> > L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
> >
>
--
Regards,
K. Gabriele
--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
Wait, you directly contradicted yourself <G>.... You say it's
not stored, then you say it's stored and indexed, which is it?
When you fetch a document, only stored fields are returned
and the returned data is the verbatim copy of the original
data. No attempt is made to return un-stored fields. This
has been the behavior allways. If you attempted to returned
indexed but not stored data, you'd get stemmed versions,
stop words would be removed, synonyms would be in place
etc. Not to mention it would be very slow.
If the field is stored, then there's another problem, you might
want to dump the document after reading it from the IR.
Best
Erick
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
<ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
> It indeed is not stored, but this is still unexpected behavior. It's a
> stored and indexed field, why has the index data been lost?
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Unless you stored your "content" field, the value you put in there won't
>> be fetched from the index. Verify that the doc you retrieve from the index
>> has values for "content", I bet it doesn't....
>>
>> Best
>> Erick
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
>> <ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
>> > @Test
>> > public void testUpdateLoseTermsSimplified() throws Exception {
>> > * IndexWriter writer = indexDoc();*
>> > assertEquals(1, writer.numDocs());
>> > IndexSearcher searcher = getSearcher(writer);
>> > final TermQuery termQuery = new TermQuery(new Term(content,
>> > "essen"));
>> >
>> > TopDocs docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);
>> > assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);
>> > Document doc = searcher.doc(0);
>> >
>> > * writer.updateDocument(new Term(id,doc.get(id)),doc);*
>> >
>> > searcher = getSearcher(writer);
>> > * docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);*
>> > * assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);*//docs.totalHits == 0 !
>> > }
>> >
>> > testUpdateLosesTerms(com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest) Time
>> elapsed:
>> > 0.346 sec <<< FAILURE!
>> > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
>> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
>> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454)
>> > at
>> >
>> com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest.testUpdateLosesTerms(WcTest.java:271)
>> >
>> > I have not changed anything (as you can see) during the update. I just
>> > retrieve a document and the update it. But then the termQuery that worked
>> > before doesn't work anymore (while the "id" field wasn't changed). Is
>> this
>> > to be expected when content field is not stored?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > K. Gabriele
>> >
>> > --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
>> > P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
>> > receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
>> > subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧
>> time(x)
>> > < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
>> >
>> > If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the
>> email
>> > does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid
>> code
>> > starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
>> > ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
>> > L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> K. Gabriele
>
> --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
> < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
>
> If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
> does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
> starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
> L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
>
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Gabriele Kahlout <ga...@mysimpatico.com>.
It indeed is not stored, but this is still unexpected behavior. It's a
stored and indexed field, why has the index data been lost?
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Unless you stored your "content" field, the value you put in there won't
> be fetched from the index. Verify that the doc you retrieve from the index
> has values for "content", I bet it doesn't....
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
> <ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
> > @Test
> > public void testUpdateLoseTermsSimplified() throws Exception {
> > * IndexWriter writer = indexDoc();*
> > assertEquals(1, writer.numDocs());
> > IndexSearcher searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> > final TermQuery termQuery = new TermQuery(new Term(content,
> > "essen"));
> >
> > TopDocs docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);
> > assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);
> > Document doc = searcher.doc(0);
> >
> > * writer.updateDocument(new Term(id,doc.get(id)),doc);*
> >
> > searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> > * docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);*
> > * assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);*//docs.totalHits == 0 !
> > }
> >
> > testUpdateLosesTerms(com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest) Time
> elapsed:
> > 0.346 sec <<< FAILURE!
> > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
> > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454)
> > at
> >
> com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest.testUpdateLosesTerms(WcTest.java:271)
> >
> > I have not changed anything (as you can see) during the update. I just
> > retrieve a document and the update it. But then the termQuery that worked
> > before doesn't work anymore (while the "id" field wasn't changed). Is
> this
> > to be expected when content field is not stored?
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > K. Gabriele
> >
> > --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> > P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> > receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> > subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧
> time(x)
> > < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
> >
> > If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the
> email
> > does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid
> code
> > starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> > ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
> > L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
> >
>
--
Regards,
K. Gabriele
--- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
< Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
Re: Can I still search documents once updated?
Posted by Erick Erickson <er...@gmail.com>.
Unless you stored your "content" field, the value you put in there won't
be fetched from the index. Verify that the doc you retrieve from the index
has values for "content", I bet it doesn't....
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Gabriele Kahlout
<ga...@mysimpatico.com> wrote:
> @Test
> public void testUpdateLoseTermsSimplified() throws Exception {
> * IndexWriter writer = indexDoc();*
> assertEquals(1, writer.numDocs());
> IndexSearcher searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> final TermQuery termQuery = new TermQuery(new Term(content,
> "essen"));
>
> TopDocs docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);
> assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);
> Document doc = searcher.doc(0);
>
> * writer.updateDocument(new Term(id,doc.get(id)),doc);*
>
> searcher = getSearcher(writer);
> * docs = searcher.search(termQuery, 1);*
> * assertEquals(1, docs.totalHits);*//docs.totalHits == 0 !
> }
>
> testUpdateLosesTerms(com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest) Time elapsed:
> 0.346 sec <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:645)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:470)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:454)
> at
> com.mysimpatico.me.indexplugins.WcTest.testUpdateLosesTerms(WcTest.java:271)
>
> I have not changed anything (as you can see) during the update. I just
> retrieve a document and the update it. But then the termQuery that worked
> before doesn't work anymore (while the "id" field wasn't changed). Is this
> to be expected when content field is not stored?
>
> --
> Regards,
> K. Gabriele
>
> --- unchanged since 20/9/10 ---
> P.S. If the subject contains "[LON]" or the addressee acknowledges the
> receipt within 48 hours then I don't resend the email.
> subject(this) ∈ L(LON*) ∨ ∃x. (x ∈ MyInbox ∧ Acknowledges(x, this) ∧ time(x)
> < Now + 48h) ⇒ ¬resend(I, this).
>
> If an email is sent by a sender that is not a trusted contact or the email
> does not contain a valid code then the email is not received. A valid code
> starts with a hyphen and ends with "X".
> ∀x. x ∈ MyInbox ⇒ from(x) ∈ MySafeSenderList ∨ (∃y. y ∈ subject(x) ∧ y ∈
> L(-[a-z]+[0-9]X)).
>