You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pulsar.apache.org by Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> on 2020/01/14 03:05:58 UTC
Github action migration Discussion
After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
Github action:
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
Thanks,
Guangning
Re: Github action migration Discussion
Posted by Yu Liu <yu...@streamnative.io>.
+1
Especially for doc PRs. Passing all Jenkins tests eats up much time.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 4:15 PM Jinfeng Huang <hj...@streamnative.io> wrote:
> +1
> Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins.
>
> Best Regards,
> Jennifer
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> > Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> > insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
> >
> > Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
> >
> > Github action:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
> > https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
> >
> > Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Guangning
> >
>
Re: Github action migration Discussion
Posted by Jinfeng Huang <hj...@streamnative.io>.
+1
Currently, a large number of PRs are blocked by Jenkins.
Best Regards,
Jennifer
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
>
> Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
>
> Github action:
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
>
> Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Thanks,
> Guangning
>
Re: Github action migration Discussion
Posted by xiaolong ran <ra...@gmail.com>.
Thanks @Guangning E contribution, The changes LGTM +1
--
Thanks
Xiaolong Ran
> 在 2020年1月14日，上午11:05，Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> 写道：
>
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
>
> Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
>
> Github action:
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
>
> Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Thanks,
> Guangning
Re: Github action migration Discussion
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
+1 Github has more resources to run CI jobs as the contributions keep
growing.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:06 AM Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
>
> Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
>
> Github action:
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
>
> Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Thanks,
> Guangning
>
Re: Github action migration Discussion
Posted by Yuva raj <uv...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 08:36, Guangning E <eg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> After a period of testing, Github's action is much more stable than
> Jenkins. Jenkins now has a large number of tasks in the queue and
> insufficient resources. The committer cannot trigger the test.
>
> Jenkins: https://builds.apache.org/job/pulsar_precommit_java8/
>
> Github action:
>
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6041/checks?check_run_id=388093558
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6037/checks?check_run_id=386604833
> https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6034/checks?check_run_id=385585117
>
> Now let's consider migration testing from Jenkins to Github action
>
> Thanks,
> Guangning
--
Thanks
Yuvaraj L