You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@opennlp.apache.org by Rodrigo Agerri <ro...@ehu.es> on 2013/04/04 13:16:24 UTC
apache license and opennlp name
Hello,
We are working on a pipeline for linguistic annotation using our own
trained models for English and Spanish (and possibly extended to other
languages). As we are using Apache OpenNLP API as the basis for both
training and annotation, we would like to reflect this in the name of
the modules we distribute. For example, we would like name them
$ourgroup-opennlp-tok, $ourgroup-opennlp-pos, etc. and so on.
Do you think this will comply with point 6 of APL 2.0?
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
Cheers,
Rodrigo
Re: apache license and opennlp name
Posted by Rodrigo Agerri <ro...@ehu.es>.
OK, thanks.
Rodrigo
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 04/04/2013 01:16 PM, Rodrigo Agerri wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We are working on a pipeline for linguistic annotation using our own
>> trained models for English and Spanish (and possibly extended to other
>> languages). As we are using Apache OpenNLP API as the basis for both
>> training and annotation, we would like to reflect this in the name of
>> the modules we distribute. For example, we would like name them
>> $ourgroup-opennlp-tok, $ourgroup-opennlp-pos, etc. and so on.
>>
>> Do you think this will comply with point 6 of APL 2.0?
>>
>> 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
>> names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
>> except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing
>> the
>> origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
>>
>
>
> The trademark faq says OpenNLP should not be used as a secondary branding in
> a product
> name.
>
> Have a look here:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#products
>
> Jörn
Re: apache license and opennlp name
Posted by Jörn Kottmann <ko...@gmail.com>.
On 04/04/2013 01:16 PM, Rodrigo Agerri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are working on a pipeline for linguistic annotation using our own
> trained models for English and Spanish (and possibly extended to other
> languages). As we are using Apache OpenNLP API as the basis for both
> training and annotation, we would like to reflect this in the name of
> the modules we distribute. For example, we would like name them
> $ourgroup-opennlp-tok, $ourgroup-opennlp-pos, etc. and so on.
>
> Do you think this will comply with point 6 of APL 2.0?
>
> 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
> names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
> except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
> origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
>
The trademark faq says OpenNLP should not be used as a secondary
branding in a product
name.
Have a look here:
http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#products
Jörn