You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/18 11:43:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (MENFORCER-304) Improve dependency resolving in
multiple modules project
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16480521#comment-16480521 ]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MENFORCER-304:
------------------------------------------
gmshake opened a new pull request #35: [MENFORCER-304] Improve dependency resolving in multiple modules project
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/35
see [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-304](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-304)
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
> Improve dependency resolving in multiple modules project
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MENFORCER-304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-304
> Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Standard Rules
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-M1
> Reporter: Zhenlei Huang
> Priority: Minor
>
> In a multiple modules project, some enforcer rule can not get sufficient dependency info with default phase validate, causing issues like [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-168|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-168], and probable [https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-3283|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-3283]
> Proposal: Include dependencies of reactor projects (not yet compiled) during rule dependency resolving.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)