You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jason Brown (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/06/05 22:06:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-14459) DynamicEndpointSnitch should never prefer latent nodes

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16502565#comment-16502565 ] 

Jason Brown edited comment on CASSANDRA-14459 at 6/5/18 10:05 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

bq.  I figured since getSnapshot is called every 100ms in updateScore ...

Huh, you are correct. I didn't realize we did that (grab a snapshot when we calculate scores). OK, well, then ... I guess once every ten minutes isn't as egregious as I thought. Ignore my earlier comment, then.



was (Author: jasobrown):
bq.  I figured since getSnapshot is called every 100ms in updateScore ...

Huh, you are correct. I didn't realize we did that. OK, well, then ... I guess once every ten minutes isn't as egregious as I thought. Ignore my earlier comment, then.


> DynamicEndpointSnitch should never prefer latent nodes
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-14459
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14459
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Coordination
>            Reporter: Joseph Lynch
>            Assignee: Joseph Lynch
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The DynamicEndpointSnitch has two unfortunate behaviors that allow it to provide latent hosts as replicas:
>  # Loses all latency information when Cassandra restarts
>  # Clears latency information entirely every ten minutes (by default), allowing global queries to be routed to _other datacenters_ (and local queries cross racks/azs)
> This means that the first few queries after restart/reset could be quite slow compared to average latencies. I propose we solve this by resetting to the minimum observed latency instead of completely clearing the samples and extending the {{isLatencyForSnitch}} idea to a three state variable instead of two, in particular {{YES}}, {{NO}}, {{MAYBE}}. This extension allows {{EchoMessages}} and {{PingMessages}} to send {{MAYBE}} indicating that the DS should use those measurements if it only has one or fewer samples for a host. This fixes both problems because on process restart we send out {{PingMessages}} / {{EchoMessages}} as part of startup, and we would reset to effectively the RTT of the hosts (also at that point normal gossip {{EchoMessages}} have an opportunity to add an additional latency measurement).
> This strategy also nicely deals with the "a host got slow but now it's fine" problem that the DS resets were (afaik) designed to stop because the {{EchoMessage}} ping latency will count only after the reset for that host. Ping latency is a more reasonable lower bound on host latency (as opposed to status quo of zero).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org