You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by ji...@codehaus.org on 2003/10/22 16:35:46 UTC
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-106) Deployment Planner base-class
The following comment has been added to this issue:
Author: Aaron Mulder
Created: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 9:34 AM
Body:
I don't agree with the patch as it stands, for a number of reasons. However, there is good code here, and I think I can rearrange it into a more agreeable form.
- Don't like the packaging (both actual names and decisions on which classes go where)
- Don't think DDLoader merits 3 classes, particularly when the caller needs to to cast the result anyway, and on top of that it hardcodes the module type to loader class mapping
- Don't see why DeploymentContext and DeploymentMetaData are different
- Don't like turning module types into integers for the ObjectName, and don't think this needs an interface
- Don't see why the change to AbstractManagedObject is in here
---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=GERONIMO-106
Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-106
Summary: Deployment Planner base-class
Type: Improvement
Status: Assigned
Priority: Major
Time Spent: Unknown
Remaining: Unknown
Project: Apache Geronimo
Components:
deployment
Assignee: Aaron Mulder
Reporter: Gianny DAMOUR
Created: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 9:55 AM
Updated: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:00 AM
Description:
This patch is an enhancement of GERONIMO-102, which was a "sample code" used to progress a discussion about the responsibities of Deployment Planners.
It should fix most of the drawbacks identified by Jan Bartel. Some points have not been fixed. Indeed, some of them require a significant impact of the code-base.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira