You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@camel.apache.org by "George Daswani (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/06/13 02:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CAMEL-13640) Camel Split with Aggregate, calling subroute with onException (handled = true) stops, doesn't work the same way as calling a sub route using doTry

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

George Daswani updated CAMEL-13640:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
Split  with Aggregate calling a sub route that has handled exception (eq. direct:exceptionStart) doesn't behave the same as one calling a sub route swallowing exceptions using doTry (eq. direct:doTryStart)

The two should be functionally equivalent but the one calling the sub route with onException stops prematurely.   It never gets to ".log("done with split and aggregate").   

Others have reported the same thing on the camel-users list.

Sample program attached (maven project) - BugReport.zip

 
{code:java}
public void configure() throws Exception {

from("direct:exceptionStart").routeId("exceptionStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
.to("direct:processItemOnException").end().log("done with split and aggregate");

from("direct:processItemOnException").routeId("processItemOnException").onException(Exception.class)
.handled(true).end().log("${body}").throwException(new Exception("an Error!"));

from("direct:doTryStart").routeId("doTryStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
.to("direct:processItemOnDoTry").end().log("done with split and aggregate");

from("direct:processItemOnDoTry").routeId("processItemOnDoTry").doTry().log("${body}")
.throwException(new Exception("an Error!")).endDoTry().doCatch(Exception.class)
.log("swallowed exception");
}{code}
 

  was:
Split  with Aggregate calling a sub route that has handled exception (eq. direct:exceptionStart) doesn't behave the same as one calling a sub route swallowing exceptions using doTry (eq. direct:doTryStart)

The two should be functionally equivalent but the one calling the sub route with onException stops prematurely.   It never gets to ".log("done with split and aggregate").   


Others have reported the same thing on the [forums|http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/endDoTry-problem-td5543541.html]



Sample program attached (maven project) - BugReport.zip

 
{code:java}
public void configure() throws Exception {

from("direct:exceptionStart").routeId("exceptionStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
.to("direct:processItemOnException").end().log("done with split and aggregate");

from("direct:processItemOnException").routeId("processItemOnException").onException(Exception.class)
.handled(true).end().log("${body}").throwException(new Exception("an Error!"));

from("direct:doTryStart").routeId("doTryStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
.to("direct:processItemOnDoTry").end().log("done with split and aggregate");

from("direct:processItemOnDoTry").routeId("processItemOnDoTry").doTry().log("${body}")
.throwException(new Exception("an Error!")).endDoTry().doCatch(Exception.class)
.log("swallowed exception");
}{code}
 


> Camel Split with Aggregate, calling subroute with onException (handled = true) stops, doesn't work the same way as calling a sub route using doTry 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-13640
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-13640
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 2.24.0
>            Reporter: George Daswani
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: BugReport.zip
>
>
> Split  with Aggregate calling a sub route that has handled exception (eq. direct:exceptionStart) doesn't behave the same as one calling a sub route swallowing exceptions using doTry (eq. direct:doTryStart)
> The two should be functionally equivalent but the one calling the sub route with onException stops prematurely.   It never gets to ".log("done with split and aggregate").   
> Others have reported the same thing on the camel-users list.
> Sample program attached (maven project) - BugReport.zip
>  
> {code:java}
> public void configure() throws Exception {
> from("direct:exceptionStart").routeId("exceptionStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
> .to("direct:processItemOnException").end().log("done with split and aggregate");
> from("direct:processItemOnException").routeId("processItemOnException").onException(Exception.class)
> .handled(true).end().log("${body}").throwException(new Exception("an Error!"));
> from("direct:doTryStart").routeId("doTryStart").split(body(), new MyAggregationStrategy())
> .to("direct:processItemOnDoTry").end().log("done with split and aggregate");
> from("direct:processItemOnDoTry").routeId("processItemOnDoTry").doTry().log("${body}")
> .throwException(new Exception("an Error!")).endDoTry().doCatch(Exception.class)
> .log("swallowed exception");
> }{code}
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)